William King

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@Lilly413657 @Schtal2 It's simpler than that. In wars, soldiers die. So if many men die, few women die, & women get horny... there ya go, instant hypergamy. Doesn't matter if the society is patriarchal or matriarchal, all that matters is if women are warriors or not.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@Crowl8wg @Schtal2

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

Taking away someone else's rights will never restore any rights. You can't restore the right to freedom from murder once someone has been murdered. You say that deterrence "theory" is absurd, but only by exaggerating the degree; meanwhile, your warped concept of "justice" is absurd at any degree, because it accomplishes nothing. That's because you don't actually believe in justice, you believe in vengeance and you play word games to justify it.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@fearplay78 @iam_biglad1 Attempts, maybe. Succeeds? Lul.

I like capitalism but come on now, this bug has been adequately patched yet

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@ewwwtfff Some women are incapable of mentally processing that they've been sexually rejected.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@omgsidewalks That's correct. If you do not earn your food, you deserve to starve to death.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@prolifefrenchie The number one worldwide source of anti-White racism is White women

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@mjeslfc Every time a tomboy is tricked into getting a mastectomy, I shed a little tear.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@RemainAnonK I call it the Law of Conservation of Gender Roles. If feminism makes women act more like men, then necessarily men will start acting more like women. For example, if his wife gets a better job than him and they have kids, guess who's cooking dinner and changing diapers.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@exsysjj @WaIgnoreme Ah look, another Jew supremacist

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@zun_Knight @WaIgnoreme Wouldn't banning porn put female pornstars out of work?

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@ChoochSkookum The test is whether you provide more RESOURCES than other men she can live with. If the answer is YES, then when she becomes unhappy she will not leave; she might make you miserable, but she will desire to keep leeching off of you, as sexlessly as possible.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

No, that's not how men work. Here's how they work:
1. As long as a man can hit it at least once every 9 months, he is biologically wired to care more about fidelity than libido in women.
2. Because of testosterone, he cares a lot about female libido. But still cares about fidelity more.
3. When a man is a whore — and many are — he should hate himself. That would be non-hypocritical. But hypocrisy is our superpower so make whores rarely hate themselves.
4. Men are so good at loving themselves when they probably shouldn't, that most guys will try to select for that low body count woman even though the competition for her is fierce and she's completely out of their league.
5. Oh and if miss low body count is fat, she doesn't exist to him

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@SekuharaSenseiX Nobody is confused about what is real? Explain Flat Earthers.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@AdamService @QuetzalPhoenix So is it okay to idolize high-quality pussy?

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@FlyingCookies25 @BrianAtlas The girl who cries wolf enables the wolf

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

@BaneThe76451 Time for a really hot take...

If porn wasn't considered haram by Islam, the grooming gangs in the UK wouldn't have happened.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

The problem of overfederalism is FAR larger than the problem of people on welfare voting. About a third of Americans are net taxpayers, while the largest state in the union makes up about one ninth of the total population. Men from other states voting on local issues is a bigger problem than women from my state voting on them.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

Sorry for not including this in the previous reply.

This is why I have coined this particular line of thinking as "ethnocommunism." Because the West largely rejected communism on the individual level, the propaganda had to change. The way it changed was to take it to the group level: if the White racial average doesn't equal the black racial average, then blacks need special privileges to even it out. But the methodology imposed, in practice, doesn't just require group averages to be equal to achieve the idealized zero measurement, it requires equality on the individual to individual level as well. Ethnocommunism is just communism in a clever disguise; the racial averages are just a distraction, designed to overwhelm the target by striking at their misunderstanding of statistics.

[William King @WilliamKin65977]

It's worse than that.

Let's say that I had 100 jerseys, 50 red and 50 blue. I then get a perfectly random sample of Americans and distribute the jerseys with a perfect 50-50 chance between them. Then I have both teams do IQ tests (or any other measurement which follows a normal distribution). On average, one team would score 2.4 points higher than the other team; sometimes the average would be greater than that.

So even if we completely eliminate bias AND the two groups DO have the same averages, equality will not be the result. Thus, even if the assumed axiom 1 was true, 3 does NOT logically follow from 1 and 2. Past a certain point, the pursuit of equality in measured results demands not just equality in averages, but also the elimination of variance — that is, that all values be equal, not just the averages.