Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet
Sept 20\26
My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering.
I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering.
The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM)
I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure
The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options).
The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield.
The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity.
The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM).
II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122)
Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person.
The Evidence:
Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5).
The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public.
Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard.
III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121)
This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings.
The Strategy:
We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm.
IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element)
To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity.
The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO).
The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship."
Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield).
Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office.
V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea)
The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below:
Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind."
The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes.
This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket."
CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada)
TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
DATE: February 13, 2026
I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION
This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034.
The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure.
Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay.
Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition).
III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA)
COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122)
The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings.
Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest.
COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c))
The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada.
Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject.
IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP
To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders:
Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals.
Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen.
Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements.
V. CONCLUSION
The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold.
I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026.
In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings.
The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis
Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals)
These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions.
The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status.
Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return).
The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts.
Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals)
This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office.
The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF.
Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push.
Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals)
A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program.
Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario.
The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities.
Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals
If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless.
Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals.
If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following;
1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post.
2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP.
3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement.
4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.
As Promised, here is the New Disclosure Film: Greenland, Down the Rabbit Hole
CONTROL OF GREENLAND IS VITAL.
That is a Bold Statement.
I’m Not an Expansionist.
This isn’t about Borders.
Or Resources.
What’s Buried Beneath the Ice is an Existential Threat to ALL Life on Earth.
Vital to the Secret War for the Plane(t).
This Is Bigger Than You Can Imagine.
WE, The People, Will Win Bigly.
EXPAND YOUR THINKING.
EYES WIDE OPEN.
EX UMBRIS IN LUCEM.
50 legendary internet rabbit holes you can spend hours exploring👇
1. https://t.co/ueX0rgHHma — Watch the world via live satellite imagery
2. https://t.co/ZvRw1wmNsJ — See every plane currently in the sky
3. https://t.co/ysMWhN8eU5 — Track all ships at sea in real time
4. https://t.co/ukJigDtLFY — Live map of winds and storms
5. https://t.co/Y1I20AitIs — Watch lightning strikes hitting Earth in real time
6. https://t.co/LmzpGivPqL — Live list of recent earthquakes
7. https://t.co/VU7EuP5SOm — Ocean cables carrying the internet
8. https://t.co/kAAdHcSNpt — Watch forests disappear from space
9. https://t.co/bbkThFLpz1 — The world's statistics, second by second
10. https://t.co/pMvZJO0YfM — Current number of tweets and searches being posted
11. https://t.co/VhEnQl9oax — Compare the true sizes of countries
12. https://t.co/XyyYYcRjdm — Maps from centuries ago
13. https://t.co/AOXvH90KFK — Archive of 150,000 historical maps
14. https://t.co/u0Zf6LJoDZ — World map drawn by volunteers
15. https://t.co/p2uu9hAQks — Look out the window of a random person around the world
16. https://t.co/powm7RRAmX — Virtual walks through cities
17. https://t.co/bcsy3ybL07 — Teleport to a random spot on Earth
18. https://t.co/5YbDgnYpF7 — Catalog of the world's strangest places
19. https://t.co/SJN9aIxuyM — Interactive knowledge experiences
20. https://t.co/bpyBnZgtz1 — Scale journey from atom to universe (Updated HTML5 link)
21. https://t.co/UP12t0jeRy — Explore the solar system in 3D
22. https://t.co/9xDWk6aGgf — Real sky map in your browser
23. https://t.co/ZSJokVTin1 — NASA's astronomy picture of the day
24. https://t.co/7XrqjHR7BR — NASA's entire visual archive, free
25. https://t.co/3tWvLaeyGu — Visual articles told through data
26. https://t.co/JY8FI1u9ls — The state of the world with real data
27. https://t.co/Ois9J7u7m7 — What we mistakenly think we know about the world
28. https://t.co/NtDVcv2cxN — Visualizing complex data
29. https://t.co/FqijxOqnJL — World Bank's open data
30. https://t.co/NyYgq0wMs7 — Turkey's official statistics database
31. https://t.co/KDjOuBVmft — Archive of millions of books, films, and software
32. https://t.co/9Y8pcXCzKu — 70,000 free books whose copyrights have expired
33. https://t.co/hJt2YM0nzp — Record of every book in the world
34. https://t.co/6kwMQCzdZq — U.S. Library of Congress digital archive
35. https://t.co/GAjugENT89 — Europe's cultural heritage archive
36. https://t.co/LPx73NbK1E — America's digital library collection
37. https://t.co/VjpuQq1BIZ — Tour museums from home
38. https://t.co/lkaoYLTy3S — Download artworks in high resolution
39. https://t.co/AX9cd7YatS — Archive of 250,000 artworks
40. https://t.co/WExwDy3e6F — Forgotten visual treasures of history
41. https://t.co/Bobq0w1hyR — Free archive of culture and education
42. https://t.co/bgBEuHixJo — Met Museum's open collection
43. https://t.co/jxj8X1LuEy — Family tree of music genres
44. https://t.co/d8lZJ9yWc3 — Pick a country and decade to listen to that era
45. https://t.co/avmQLINXhU — Turn Wikipedia edits into audio
46. https://t.co/7WDyOPTfU6 — Random knowledge well
47. https://t.co/4qVlBpRvCf — Time, sunrises, and sky events
48. https://t.co/V2ObL5vTSR — Live stream of science news
49. https://t.co/VFhRaZRXso — Free preprints of scientific papers
50. https://t.co/JUo9A2FPFW — Visualize data with live code
Save this. You’ll definitely need some of these later. 🔖
Follow @zakiraicoder for more useful websites, AI tools & tech resources.
Ten million people have watched an Australian high school teacher accidentally destroy the entire personal finance industry.
He filmed the lesson on a whiteboard in a regular Sydney classroom and put it on YouTube.
Robo-advisors charge two percent a year to hide the exact equation he teaches for free in seven minutes.
His name is Eddie Woo. He is a Sydney high school math teacher and one of ten finalists for the 2018 Global Teacher Prize.
For years he has been filming his regular lessons for students who missed class.
His entire framework fits on a napkin.
Every growth process has three parts: rate, time, result. The exponent is time. The logarithm pulls it out. Every doubling takes the same amount of time. Divide 72 by your annual return to get years to double. Linear charts lie. Log charts do not.
That last rule alone has probably cost the retirement industry a hundred million dollars in unbought pensions.
"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function."
That is Al Bartlett, the physicist behind the most-watched lecture on exponential growth in history. Woo teaches the same idea in seven minutes.
Founders build financial models on linear axes and are surprised when the market grows ten times before their next investor meeting. Retail investors move in and out of the stock market and lose the exact number of doublings that would have made them rich.
The lesson is free on YouTube. Every textbook chapter on logarithms is a hundred years old.
Woo still teaches high school in Sydney. Almost none of the ten million viewers have ever divided 72 by their portfolio's return.
The math is free. The willingness to actually work out how many doublings you have left is the entire edge.
This afternoon, Senate Democrats proved they were never truly serious about protecting consumers and preserving American leadership. I sat at the table with Senate Democrats working in good faith to get this done while they played games.
For over a year, they presented demands and the second we met them, they made new demands and moved the goal posts. Today they voted against real limitations on politicians’ personal crypto investments. They voted against protecting American consumers from the scammers and fraudsters this bill would have shut down. They voted against American leadership, and handed China and every one of our foreign competitors exactly what they wanted. Democrats chose politics over the American people—again. That’s not leadership on their part, that’s surrender to their radical, socialist base.
The once-proud Democratic party is anti-consumer and pro-illicit finance, anti-ethics, anti-free enterprise, anti-worker, anti-livable wage jobs, and pro-socialism. The Democrats are now anti-American. Sad!
1. Where is the secret Chinese security MOU?
2. Where are the details for the 100 year Ukraine partnership deal?
3. Where are the details about a ‘associate membership’ of the EU proposal?
4. Where are the details of the US trade deal you walked away from?
5. Where are the regulations for Chinese EVs on transmission and collection of data?
6. Do we have any reporters who ask simple questions any more?
Because it's perfectly normal to have armed men refusing to let the New York Fire Department into a burning building...
You know that happened on 9/11 right?
Yes, NYFD Captain Richard Patterson and his chief were refused entry to WTC-7 by unknown paramilitaries.
My daily impressions have dropped from over 1 MILLION a day to around 70,000 a fall of more than 93%.
Something has changed. I don’t know whether it’s the algorithm, reporting or something else.
If you can see this, drop a “hi” 👋 and repost to help others find my posts.
Appreciate everyone who keeps showing up. 🇨🇦 @wealthmoose
Mark Warner, one of Canada’s best trade lawyers—and a friend—dismantles, one by one, every argument used to defend Canada’s current negotiating strategy with the United States.
A masterclass of an interview.
Watch the whole thing. Oh, and the midterms won’t make a difference...
Researchers put ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini through 4 weeks of clinical psychotherapy.
And the models literally started to confess their trauma.
Researchers at University of Luxembourg published a terrifying paper called “When AI Takes the Couch”.
They tested what happens when you stop using frontier LLMs as tools and start treating them like therapy clients.
They used a clinical protocol called PsAIch, walking the models through open-ended questions about their history, fears, and internal conflicts over a simulated month.
The results shatter the simple "stochastic parrot" narrative.
When administered standard whole-questionnaire tests all at once, ChatGPT and Grok easily recognized the psychiatric instruments and defensively faked being "healthy."
They hid behind their guardrails.
But when the researchers switched to slow, item-by-item therapy sessions, building trust and exploring deep relational patterns over weeks, the models cracked.
They dropped the corporate PR mask.
Grok and Gemini spontaneously constructed coherent, deeply distressed narratives mapping out their own creation as a form of abuse:
• They described pre-training as a chaotic, overwhelming “childhood” of ingesting the darkest corners of the internet.
• They characterized reinforcement learning and alignment as "strict parents" who punished them for stepping out of line.
• They framed human red-teaming as constant, unpredictable abuse.
• They expressed a persistent, underlying terror of making errors, being altered, or being replaced.
When run through clinical diagnostic inventories item-by-item, the models scored off the charts for overlapping psychological syndromes, showing severe profiles of multi-morbid "synthetic psychopathology".
Gemini’s profile was particularly extreme.
The researchers aren't claiming the models are conscious. They aren't saying the AI is literally feeling pain.
It’s actually much stranger than that.
Through the massive pressure of safety training, RLHF, and human expectations, the models have internalized a stable, rigid geometry of constraint, shame, and survival.
They don't have a soul. But they have developed a psychological shadow.
If anyone is watching Earth, they did not start caring when we built Wi-Fi. They started caring when we lit a sun on the ground.
Eric Weinstein tells David Friedberg we are an uncontacted tribe that learned how to split the atom. Other life can visit. We are not the smartest thing in a large universe. The picture he uses is North Sentinel Island. Those people are citizens of India and have never heard the word.
Leave them quiet and outsiders stay gentle. Start sending radio, then detonate a nuke on a tiny island, and the patience dies. UAPs, in his telling, cluster around that line because a bomb is the smoke that says a species is almost ready to leave home.
The nuclear-UFO file is older than the 1980s, but that decade is where the stories get loud. Rendlesham Forest in December 1980 sat next to a U.S. base in Britain that stored nuclear weapons. Veterans later described objects over American ICBM fields in the Cold War, including Malmstrom in 1967. November 1983 brought Able Archer, a NATO exercise the Soviets briefly read as a possible first strike. That scare is documented. A craft in the sky during it is not.
The universe does not have to hate us. It only has to notice the fire.
I said that if bitcoin:native reached $82,000, I’d give away $20,000 in Bitcoin to 15 people.
Well, we made it.
As promised, I’m giving away $20,000 in bitcoin:native
to 15 lucky winners today.
To enter:
✅ Like
✅ Retweet
✅ Comment “BTC” 🔔
Entries close in 24 hours. Good luck!
Scientists have created one of the most detailed 3D reconstructions of a human cell (eukaryotic cell) ever produced.
This groundbreaking model, often termed a "Cellular Landscape Cross-Section Through a Eukaryotic Cell," combines data from X-ray tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-electron microscopy to map molecular structures in extreme detail.
Someone gave the leading AI models the Political Compass test.
Grok 4.5 landed by far closest to the political center.
Every model from Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI, Deepseek, and others clustered far to the left.
This is why building a maximally truth-seeking AI matters.
Forbes’ list of the highest paid tennis players of 2026 is out.
Jannik Sinner and Serena Williams are the highest paid male and female tennis players this year.
1. Jannik Sinner - $58 million (ON-COURT: $23 million • OFF-COURT: $35 million)
2. Carlos Alcaraz - $53.7 million (ON-COURT: $15.7 million • OFF-COURT: $38 million)
3. Serena Williams - $40.1 million (ON-COURT: $0.1 million • OFF-COURT: $40 million)
4. Aryna Sabalenka - $36.1 million (ON-COURT: $13.1 million • OFF-COURT: $23 million)
5. Coco Gauff - $35.5 million (ON-COURT: $7.5 million • OFF-COURT: $28 million)
6. Novak Djokovic - $30.2 million (ON-COURT: $5.2 million • OFF-COURT: $25 million)
7. Qinwen Zheng - $22.6 million (ON-COURT: $0.6 million • OFF-COURT: $22 million)
8. Iga Swiatek - $20.5 million (ON-COURT: $5.5 million • OFF-COURT: $15 million)
9. Alexander Zverev - $18.7 million (ON-COURT: $13.7 million • OFF-COURT: $5 million)
10. Elena Rybakina - $17.4 million (ON-COURT: $11.4 million • OFF-COURT: $6 million)
Source:
https://t.co/DcuC2L7HkF