Martin Wynne

Irish, open minded and keen on truth. Question everything.'Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy which sustained him through temporary periods of joy'

[Christian Concern @CConcern]

🚨(1)BREAKING: Christian community police officer wins settlement after being forced out of his role for questioning and criticising Islam during diversity training.

Luke Salmons, who has been supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was suspended for six months, forced to resign and put on a police barring list after he had questioned radical Islam in a training session.

He had been told that the session was a 'safe place' for discussion, but after expressing his beliefs, the consequences were devastating.

After taking legal action, his case has now been settled on confidential terms, however his story raises serious concerns about free speech and religious freedom in UK policing.

See more in this thread 🧵on our website and breaking in the media:
https://t.co/Ed9elAMIKa

https://t.co/sAkxcVf9PW

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Peel's Founding Philosophy Has Guided British Policing For Two Centuries. We Have Spent Fifty Years Dismantling It.

In 1829 Sir Robert Peel established the Metropolitan Police on a founding philosophy that has guided British policing for nearly two centuries. That philosophy was later codified into nine principles known as the Peelian Principles and is still taught to every new recruit today. Those principles contain everything British policing needs to know about what went wrong on a Southampton street on December 4th 2025.

Principle two. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.

Principle five. The police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.

Absolute impartial service to the law. Not racial equity. Not colour awareness. Not white privilege training. Not disproportionality monitoring. Not community sensitivity. Absolute impartial service to the law. Every person. Every community. Every accusation. The same standard. Without exception.

Principle seven. The police are the public and the public are the police. Not the police are the ethnic minority communities and the ethnic minority communities are the police. The public. All of them. Equally.

Principle nine. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it. Not the reduction of disproportionality in stop and search. Not the diversity of the workforce. Not the number of officers completing unconscious bias training. The absence of crime and disorder. That is the test.

Now place those principles alongside the documents governing Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary on the night Henry Nowak died.

The Hampshire Race Action Plan commits to pursuing offenders who cause harm to ethnic minority communities specifically. Not all communities. Ethnic minority communities specifically. The NPCC guidance tells officers that a commitment to racial equity does not mean treating everyone the same or being colour blind. The Metropolitan Police race action plan informs officers that neutrality is a myth and that their whiteness prevents impartiality. The Hampshire Inclusion Matters diversity course made nearly twenty percent of officers afraid they would be rejected for saying the wrong thing. The University of Reading noted that officers who did not respond well to the training may benefit from further intervention, monitoring or coaching.

Peel said absolute impartial service to the law. The Metropolitan Police said neutrality is a myth. Peel said the police are the public. The NPCC said the police cannot be colour blind. Peel said the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder. The College of Policing said the test is reducing disproportionality in the use of police powers against ethnic minorities.

These are not compatible frameworks. They are opposing philosophies. One treats every citizen as equal before the law. The other treats citizens differently according to their ethnicity and the accusations they make. One produced two centuries of policing by consent. The other produced the officers who handcuffed Henry Nowak.

Alexis Boon, the chief constable of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary, described the national outcry as a furore that had been whipped up. He does not accept the term two tier policing.

Principle two. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.

The public approval is gone. The respect has been lost. The chief constable who cannot see why has not read the principles he was taught on his first day.

The answer has been there since 1829. What changed was the decision to abandon it.

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

Henry Nowak: How Anti-Racism Gave You Racism

[Paul Weston @PWestoff]

More disturbing details slowly bubble to the surface re Henry Nowak's murder and @HantsPolice complicity. Chief Constable Boon's claim of Henry not surviving regardless of police uselessness was based on the pathology report from Home Office registered Dr Amanda Jeffrey, which is being contested by Dr Krzysztof Magier in the post below.

In addition to this, the body-cam audio proves the police were told Henry was in a state of collapse when they arrived and had blood in his mouth. He also had a clearly visible knife-wound to his face according to the judge's summing up (link below).

In addition to this, the judge also noted Henry's attempted escape route was visible by the bloodstain trail.

Dr Krzysztof Magier claims the dragging and cuffing of Henry likely opened up a partially clotted sliced vein, and had he been taken straight to hospital would have had a 50% chance of survival.

Hants Police are complicit in his murder. Not least the thick DEI female officer who eventually called an ambulance but told them the victim was "beat up" rather than stabbed, thereby delaying the response time. Hopefully the truth behind this will slowly emerge. Even more hopefully, manslaughter charges will be bought against these monster police on the scene, and Chief Constable Boon will be sacked in disgrace.

Judge's summing up here: https://t.co/HdWCncOIy4

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨BREAKING: SPECIALIST DOCTOR SAYS HENRY NOWAK COULD HAVE LIVED IF NOT FOR POLICE

In summary:

- Henry was alive when they arrived and likely clotted
- Aggressive police intervention likely tore clot
- Major Trauma department was minutes away from scene
- Judge and Pathologist were FAR TOO LENIENT on Police
- Henry Nowak had 50% CHANCE to survive
- Absolutely convinced that if he arrived in hospital alive he would have survived

This is disgusting, the family deserve justice

Full breakdown below:

Dr Krzysztof Magier [@DrMagier] based in the Isle of Wight is a qualified Paediatric Care Lead and part of the 'Critical Care Network' with experience in combat medicine training and a specialized course in treating severe injuries (including gunshot and stab wounds) has analysed the footage and claimed the AGGRESSIVE Police intervention may have contributed towards Henry's death.

Dr Magier DISAGREES with the pathologist's and judge's opinion that Henry Nowak had ZERO chance of SURVIVAL.

As well as the claim that handcuffing him essentially changed NOTHING.

In fact he claims the REVERSE IS TRUE, there is a high likelihood that the police intervention CONTRIBUTED TO HENRY'S DEATH.

He analysed the autopsy report, which points to DAMAGE to the subclavian vein as the main source of BLEEDING.

In a healthy person, venous bleeding occurs under low pressure and often self-limits thanks to the NATURALLY FORMING CLOT, while simply approximating the wound edges and compressing the surrounding tissues closes the vein enough to slow or even stop the bleeding.

The body camera footage shows that when police arrived on the scene (likely 5-10 minutes after the injury), Henry was CONCIOUS ENOUGH to speak LOUDLY.

He was therefore NOT YET in a terminal state.

After his arms were twisted behind his back and handcuffed, the vein was most likely STRETCHED, the clot TORN, and BLEEDING DRAMATICALLY INTENSIFIED.

Within just about three minutes, he lost consciousness and DIED.

People with suspected internal injuries should NEVER be moved or yanked abruptly, such actions can destroy the natural clot and lead to massive internal hemorrhage.

Instead of immediately calling a medical rescue team and handing the patient over to paramedics, the police ARRESTED HIM.

If paramedics had arrived first on the scene, Henry’s chances of survival would have been MUCH HIGHER.

AS HIGH AS "50%"—writes Dr. Magier.

Paramedics could have quickly started an IV, administered fluids to increase circulating blood volume, and tranexamic acid to stabilize the clot, and if needed, performed needle decompression (inserting a large, long needle into the lung), because the issue wasn’t so much lack of lung function, but compression of the blood-filled lung on the heart and mediastinum, which blocks circulation.

Worse still, the incident took place just a few minutes' drive by car (2–3 minutes by ambulance with sirens) from Southampton University Hospital—a regional MAJOR TRAUMA CENTRE equipped with a full team of specialists, procedures, and equipment.

"I AM CONVINCED THAT IF HENRY HAD ARRIVED THERE ALIVE THE DOCTORS WOULD HAVE NOT LET HIM DIE"—writes Dr. Magier.

The aggressive police intervention, instead of saving a life, led to death through improper handling of a severely injured person, even though world-class care was just minutes away. "I fear the Judge and pathologist were too lenient toward the police"

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@JOliphant54 @BruceUnfiltered He was white. The BBC never mentioned him until this week when they had no choice and now they argue for silence, again.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@truetruth99 @BruceUnfiltered The family will have been captured as soon as the colour of the murder was known. Like Southport, a whole team of nudge operatives will have overwhelmed the family with support, guidance, warnings on tone, empathy and direction. Nothing will be left to chance.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@Grafiixx @BruceUnfiltered It's taking them a bit longer than usual to invent a plausible spin to gaslight us all 'to reject the evidence of our eyes and ears' and blame it all on Henry for not being clear enough on pointing to his wounds.

[The British Patriot @TheBritLad]

🚨BREAKING: The “taking the knee” trend has exploded across Britain.

Thousands are kneeling for Henry Nowak specifically to the track:

Michael Jackson “They Don’t Really Care About Us.”

The left are in a complete meltdown.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je me suis longtemps passionné pour la psychologie, et une période m'obsède plus que toutes les autres.

L'après-guerre.

Le moment où des chercheurs se sont posé la question la plus dérangeante du siècle: comment l'Allemagne nazie avait-elle transformé des pères de famille ordinaires en bourreaux de camp?

La réponse, ils ne l'ont pas trouvée chez des monstres. Ils l'ont trouvée chez des hommes parfaitement banals.

Hannah Arendt a appelé ça la banalité du mal. L'historien Christopher Browning, en étudiant le bataillon de réserve 101 (des policiers d'âge mûr, des pères, des commerçants), a montré que ce ne sont pas des fanatiques qui ont fusillé des civils, mais des hommes normaux incapables de désobéir au cadre dominant.

Puis vint Milgram. À Yale, environ deux tiers de gens ordinaires ont infligé ce qu'ils croyaient être des décharges mortelles, simplement parce qu'une autorité en blouse blanche le leur ordonnait. L'expérience de la prison de Stanford a montré la même chose sous un autre angle: donnez à quelqu'un un rôle et un cadre, et il s'y conformera jusqu'à l'inhumain.

La leçon n'est pas allemande. Elle est humaine.

Le mécanisme s'active dès qu'un cadre moral dominant fait craindre la sanction sociale plus que ne compte le témoignage de ses propres yeux. L'individu cesse de voir ce qu'il voit. Il voit ce que le cadre l'autorise à voir.

Maintenant, regardez Southampton.

Henry Nowak, 18 ans, poignardé, allongé au sol, répète aux policiers « j'ai été poignardé », « je ne peux plus respirer ».

Réponse de l'officier: « I don't think you have, mate. »

Pendant ce temps, son meurtrier retourne la situation d'une phrase: il aurait été victime d'une agression raciste. Quatre mots ont suffi pour déplacer le soupçon de l'agresseur vers la victime.

Et l'officier a obéi. Pas à un ordre. À un cadre.

Un cadre qui lui a appris, pendant des années, qu'une plainte pour racisme est l'accusation la plus dangereuse de sa carrière. Plus dangereuse, dans son réflexe conditionné, qu'un corps qui se vide de son sang devant lui.

Exactement le mécanisme de Milgram, de Browning. Un homme normal qui cesse de croire ses propres yeux parce qu'un cadre moral lui a appris ce qu'il devait craindre.

C'est précisément ça qui me terrifie.

Souvenez-vous: le monde entier s'est agenouillé pour quatre mots, « I can't breathe ». Des entreprises, des gouvernements, des stades entiers.

Henry a prononcé les mêmes mots, en train de mourir. Il n'y aura ni genou à terre, ni hashtag, ni minute de silence.

Parce que sa mort ne sert pas le cadre. Elle le contredit.

Et un système qui apprend à une société entière à faire passer l'accusation de racisme avant les faits, avant le corps, avant la vie, n'est pas une posture morale inoffensive.

C'est une machine à fabriquer des hommes qui, face à un enfant en train de mourir, choisissent les menottes.

[Adam Gwiazda @delestoile]

🟥 Czy Henry Nowak mógł przeżyć?
Dr Krzysztof Magier @DrMagier , lekarz pediatra i były konsul honorowy RP w Cowes, przeanalizował nagrania z policyjnej kamery nasobnej pokazujące śmierć Henry'ego Nowaka.
Dr Magier jest lekarzem prowadzącym oddział intensywnej terapii dziecięcej, z doświadczeniem w szkoleniach z medycyny pola walki oraz po specjalistycznym kursie leczenia ciężkich urazów (w tym ran postrzałowych i kłutych).
Nie zgadza się z opinią patologa i sędziego, że Henry Nowak nie miał żadnych szans na przeżycie i ze skucie go w kajdanki nic w zasadzie nie zmieniło. Wręcz przeciwnie – istnieje duże prawdopodobieństwo, że to interwencja policji przyczyniła się do jego śmierci.
Przeanalizował on raport z sekcji, który wskazuje na uszkodzenie żyły podobojczykowej jako główne źródło krwawienia i tłumaczy, gdzie leży problem.
U zdrowej osoby krwawienie żylne odbywa się pod niskim ciśnieniem i często samoogranicza się dzięki powstającemu naturalnie skrzepowi, a samo zbliżenie krawędzi rany i ucisk otaczających tkanek domyka żyłę na tyle, że spowalnia albo nawet zatrzymuje krwawienie.
Z nagrania z policyjnej kamery nasobnej wynika, że gdy policja przybyła na miejsce (prawdopodobnie 5-10 minut po zranieniu), Henry był na tyle przytomny, że mówił dość głośno. Nie był zatem jeszcze w stanie terminalnym. Po wykręceniu rąk do tyłu i skuciu za plecami najprawdopodobniej doszło do rozciągnięcia żyły, rozerwania skrzepu i gwałtownego nasilenia krwawienia. W ciągu zaledwie ok. trzech minut stracił przytomność i zmarł.
Osoby z podejrzeniem urazów wewnętrznych nigdy nie powinny być gwałtownie przemieszczane ani szarpane – takie działanie może zniszczyć naturalny skrzep i doprowadzić do masywnego krwotoku wewnętrznego.
Zamiast natychmiastowego wezwania zespołu ratownictwa medycznego i przekazania pacjenta w ręce ratowników, policja go skuła. Gdyby na miejscu jako pierwsi pojawili się paramedycy, szanse Henry’ego na przeżycie byłyby znacznie większe. "50%" - pisze dr Magier.
Ratownicy mogliby szybko założyć kroplówkę, podać płyny zwiększające objętość krwi krążącej oraz kwas traneksamowy stabilizujący skrzep, a w razie potrzeby wykonać dekompresję igłową (wkłucie grubej i długiej igły w płuco), bo problemem nie był tyle brak funkcji płuca, ale ucisk zalanego krwią płuca na serce i śródpiersie, który blokuje krążenie.
Co gorsza, incydent miał miejsce zaledwie kilka minut jazdy samochodem (2–3 minuty karetką na sygnale) od Southampton University Hospital – regionalnego Major Trauma Centre dysponującego pełnym zapleczem specjalistów, procedur i sprzętu. "Jestem przekonany, że gdyby Henry dotarł tam żywy, lekarze nie pozwoliliby mu umrzeć" - pisze dr Magier.
Podsumowując: agresywna interwencja policji, zamiast ratować życie, doprowadziła do śmierci przez nieodpowiednie postępowanie z ciężko ranionym człowiekiem, mimo że najwyższej klasy opieka była w zasięgu kilku minut. "Obawiam się, że Sędzia i patolog byli zbyt łaskawi dla policji" - pisze dr Magier.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@AsYouNotWish What makes you think they wrote it? The use of English idioms and phrases suggests otherwise. It was written by someone well versed in PR and news management and was most likely part of the Home Offices nudge team.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@ScottM141225612 @catturd2 The Beatles would have ended up supporting The Wurzels if it wasn't for the genius of George Martin.

[marco orio @Marcorio61O]

**🚨🇬🇧 MUSK: “POLICE POLICY RACIST AGAINST WHITES” – FACT OR HYPERBOLE?**

On June 3, Elon Musk claimed official police policy requires officers to “be racist against Whites” and demanded it change “NOW.” Within hours, the post had 47 million views, the hashtag #TwoTierJustice was trending globally, and Reform UK saw a 6% polling bump. Musk is *directionally* correct – but is he factually right?

**THE POLICY ON PAPER**

The NPCC Police Race Action Plan (2022, updated 2025) and its “Anti-Racism Commitment” explicitly state: “racial equity should not mean treating everyone the same or being colour blind.” Officers are trained to **treat ethnic minorities differently** to achieve “equality of policing outcomes.” Forces teach “white privilege,” “white fragility,” and “micro-aggressions” as core concepts . A College of Policing e‑learning module sets out “systemic racism” training for 146,000 officers and staff .

But the NPCC directive insists “this is not about treating black or white people differently” . The policing minister called the wording “wrong” and “giving the wrong impression” – but defended the *intent* . Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf calls it “anti-white racism, structurally embedded” .

**THE HAMPSHIRE CASE – POLICY IN PRACTICE**

On Dec 3, 2025, Henry Nowak (18) was stabbed six times. His Sikh killer falsely claimed racism. Officers handcuffed Nowak, ignored “I’ve been stabbed,” replied “I don’t think you have, mate” – and never checked his wounds until after he died. He’d been stabbed in the heart .

The killer was convicted of murder. An officer resigned. Not a single officer is currently investigated for misconduct . The Independent Office for Police Conduct is reviewing the case.

**MUSK’S CLAIM – DECONSTRUCTED**

✅ **Fact:** NPCC guidance explicitly says not to be “colour blind.”
✅ **Fact:** Officers are taught “white privilege” and “white fragility” as mandatory training.
✅ **Fact:** In one case, a dying white teenager’s pleas were ignored while the *accusation* of racism was treated as fact.

**INCENTIVES & CONSTRAINTS**

For Musk, the framing serves a strategic purpose: polarize, force acknowledgment of institutional inversion, and cement X as the alternative truth platform. For UK police, the incentive is *political survival*. The NPCC announced a review within 24 hours – not because the guidance changed, but because the political cost of defending it became unsustainable. For Reform UK, the Nowak case is electoral gold: a DEI “failure” they can ride to government.

**SECOND-ORDER EFFECTS**

This is not an isolated incident. The College of Policing has trained **over 100,000 officers** on “systemic racism” and “white privilege” since 2022. The NPCC “Anti-Racism Commitment” is embedded in every force’s performance metrics. Officers who question it are labeled “institutionally racist” – silencing internal dissent. Nowak is the logical endpoint: a system that incentivizes officers to *believe* racism accusations without evidence, lest they be punished.

**THE STRATEGIC VERDICT**

Musk’s statement is **hyperbolic but directionally accurate**. The policy does not *explicitly* say “be racist against whites” – but it creates an operational culture where white victims are treated with suspicion and minority perpetrators are presumed victims. The *result* is functional anti-white discrimination, even if the *intent* was equitable policing.

The UK now faces a stark choice: roll back DEI policing or accept that Nowak’s death will not be the last. Reform UK pledges to ban all police race action plans and DEI practices within 100 days of government. Musk’s “NOW” is not just rhetoric – it’s a political deadline.

🧭 My work focuses on decision‑oriented strategic analysis.
Not commentary. Not advocacy.
I analyze incentives, constraints, and second‑order effects.

Structured, multi‑layer strategic analysis available via bio.

⚖️ Marco | Independent Analyst

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@Marcorio61O Just listened to BBC R4 where they had a guest on, not discussing but directing the listeners on this very subject, on police policy, training etc. He gave us a contrary opinion to yours. One guest, one version of the truth, no discussion, just state nudging.

[Chief Egregore Officer @ChiefEgregore]

Nowak, Floyd, and Propaganda Inversion

The excellent Dr. Betz describes the British state as a propaganda machine that creates a "pseudo environment," a kind of fictional reality, in which the public is supposed to dwell. Specifically, he describes the process of "inversion" as a propaganda technique, where a narrative framing inverts the role of victim into perpetrator, truth into lies, etc. in the construction of this pseudo environment.

But the pseudo environment is increasingly conflicting with reality. And so the regime, whose role has functionally become the application of mass propaganda to continue to sustain its necessary fictions at scale, struggles to uphold the environment as experience with reality dispels the illusions.

And this is why the Nowak case is so destructive to the regime. It is an almost perfect A/B case study with a single variable, that being the victim's race, that determines how the machine actually reacts along that variable. And in its revealed behaviors, its Telos, the clear inversion of narrative construction and reality is revealed. It is total. A literal 180 degree reversal of truth.

George Floyd is a black foreigner from the British perspective. A video is released to the internet and it sets the black community ablaze. But the actual circumstances of his death are more questionable than the initial video suggests. Later evidence suggesting Floyd had ingested lethal amounts of drugs was largely ignored in favor of the narrative that a sanctioned police holding technique was singularly responsible for killing him. Chauvin got his show trial.

But for that set of circumstances the British state made a deliberate effort to appear deeply conciliatory, going as far as to make grand displays of kneeling and capitulation to mobs. Even though this was a foreign issue taking place in America.

Now by contrast, everywhere where there is doubt in Floyd's case, we have more egregious certainty in Nowak's. Unlike Floyd who was dying of a drug overdose, Nowak was actually dying of injuries inflicted against him. Unlike Floyd, where police did not handle him inappropriately with respect to his behavior, the police at Nowak's stabbing unacceptably ignored his pleas for help, dismissed his life threatening injuries, and utterly failed to recognize his waning signs of life, cuffing him as his life slipped away.

Further, as Floyd was actually guilty of a crime which was later minimized (counterfeiting), Nowak was innocent of the accusations of "racism" and assault that were levied against him, when he was actually murdered in cold blood. And in the manner that Leftists accuse the police of shared complicity in each other's crimes by virtue of merely being in the police, the entirety of the Digwa household actually did participate in the crime collectively sharing direct complicity in his murder.

In this regard any doubts that exist in Floyd's case have an inverted parallel in the Nowak case where the Nowak case is objectively more sympathetic based on the facts. His case is simply more objectionable at every level.

And yet, there is one critical variable. Nowak is White. Floyd is black.

And for this difference alone, the only variable of note that is meaningfully distinct from the Floyd case that shut the entire Western world down, the state's response is substantially different. There is no grand display of conciliation. We are told we should not get angry or draw wider conclusions.

And that this is revelation of the reality that the pseudo environment is trying so hard to contain.

The inverted fiction is that we live in a society that is deeply oppressive to foreigners or non-Whites, that is systematically "racist" against them. But this is the inversion.

The truth is that the system provides exceptional special privileges to the non-White / foreign cohort while actively discriminating against and otherwise behaving oppressively towards the White population.

Much of the Western world is a series of explicitly anti-White governments whose behavior is only explainable coherently through this lens. And the narrative about our own racialized guilt complex is actually a deliberate sustained manipulation program designed with the intention of preventing the disturbance of the system.

We should therefore treat these systems with the appropriate degree of respect and legitimacy, understanding that this is what they are in praxis.

[Æthelstan @TheHauskarl]

Superb work from the chaps at Lotus Eaters as always — easily the best breakdown of what took place.

Yet one detail from the bodycam footage cut deeper than the rest. While Henry begged for an ambulance and told police nine times that he couldn’t breathe — nearly an hour after being stabbed — the last words spoken to him were:

“Put the hand in the cuff, mate.”

Imagine those being the last words you hear on this earth.

I find myself more affected by these preventable horrors as I get older, not less. I picture the jars of pureed carrots, the school runs, the birthday parties, and that final year away at university — a whole life of love and investment thrown away in under an hour. Henry’s human rights didn’t count for much in those final moments.

Nevertheless, I’m sure our lords and betters, along with the HR harridans and Tone Police monitoring social media for thought crimes, would love us to get furiously angry and say terrible things.

All the better to lock people up, so the Blob may continue filling their pockets with handsome salaries undisturbed.

So instead I’ll say this:
I tire of playing word games with leftists over their Hierarchies of Victimhood while they try to jail their opponents. Anyone who was going to see sense has already done so.

Yookay Liberals are always the first to claim victimhood and yet the last to take responsibility for the broken system they created — one that views everything through a distorted lens of race and historical grievance, even as its paradoxes and double standards keep producing preventable tragedies.

It will fall to the long-suffering British public to deliver their verdict at the ballot box.

When the inevitable happens and Nigel Farage or Rupert Lowe is Prime Minister — and you’re having another bout of conniptions (Rupert Derangement Syndrome, anyone?) — those cosy legalistic fiefdoms Westminster built will be dismantled.

The system that was so blind it couldn't see what was right in front of it, that bid a dying young man farewell with “Put the hand in the cuff, mate” instead of providing urgent help or the warmth of a comforting hand will be tossed into the wheelie bin of history.

And you will have only yourselves to blame.

Britain was so beautiful. It didn't have to be like this.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@hector_drummond @Sargon_of_Akkad Ditto the presenter, the panel and the audience.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@alanvibe I'm watching BBC poliiticslive now, on the panel discussing Henry they have one black female Labour MP, one left wing Female from Independent, Danny Finkelstiein and a left wing former asian Met Officer. They all have the same mind set and point of view and blame Farage.

[Martin Wynne @WindhoverGMH2]

@LeeHarris @ZiaYusufUK BBC operate to create a narrative and establish an outcome, one of their most used tool is the 'smear'. It's deliberate and effective.