Win-ki

記錄隨寫｜遊戲｜電影｜科技時政｜Deeply loves the life::

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

They hated that they didn't have the surveillance levels that china does entirely they only talked shit about China's dystopian country because not only were they hypocritical but also as well jealous about it too they wanted that same control as china

[Paul Walsh @Paul__Walsh]

Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.

🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.

Today von der Leyen said:

"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".

💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.

🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".

💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.

🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".

💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".

🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".

💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.

🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".

💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.

🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"

💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.

💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.

💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.

💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.

🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"

💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.

🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"

💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".

💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.

🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".

💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.

💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.

💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.

💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.

💡Where this ends

🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".

George Orwell, 1984.

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@gridlandsgame OK

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@dreamylostcn 李国斌

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

包月都免费，真有人會被“釣魚”嗎？

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

这是一个针对香港用户群体的定向钓鱼。
骗取你的WhatsApp的设备授权验证。
請以官方為準，切勿掉入釣魚網站陷阱

小心新型詐騙，換湯不換藥，都係套Whatsapp登入😂😂😂

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

I wish PUBG was still huge in China
It’s the only Battle Royale that feels worth playing nowadays for me

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

很多代理机场节点基本都挂了

现在还能翻墙出来刷到此推的中国人，基本都是人中龙风🤣

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@leijun

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@SingLinkVPN 澳门

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@dcbae7777777 😍

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@telegram

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@telegram 简约风格

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

国内也敢乱发言😂

[王局拍案 @wangjupaian]

【张鹏被抓或并非单因油管言论，中共105岁生日当天在微博骂“畜生”？】

多位网友补充，张鹏被抓可能并不是因为油管上的言论，更可能与他7月1日微博内容有关。

7月1日是中共成立105周年的纪念，但张鹏当天12点多发帖：“畜生能活105岁，他就不是畜生了吗？”

随后有微博网友将其公开举报。

到7月2日，张鹏微博账号已被关闭，原因包括“攻击党和国家”等……

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@chuanxiduo 这绝对不是真实的延迟。香港真实落地延迟40ms 左右，你这应该是到服务器的出口延迟。

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@Supaboard00 我是高峰期看twitch直播 来判断节点稳定性

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@Bitcoin188 用Tuta加密邮箱

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@hhcjxx112233 给他支付宝弄黑钱进去

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@Niub2022Niu @Hp2ai 安桌不行

[Win-ki @Winki_cn]

@hejushang8 一点事也没有，只有联系人在你的列表中才能看到你号码，如果对方有你的手机号码，但不是你的联系人，是不会通过手机号码找到你。只要你手机中没有对方联系电话，没有任何人会通过手机号码找到你。