Kalae Wong

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

Kyle and Jasmine did a great job today in presenting. They both had interesting topics and they both presented it very well. Good job to both!

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

I enjoyed alondras presentation. She presented it very well and her topic was very interesting. Her topic also was related to what we talked about in class. Good Job!!

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

I really loved shimpei’s video. It was an interesting topic and I loved how he recorded videos. It was a unique way and it really stood out

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

was really interesting because it is true. The judging of bodies is a Western standard and it has become a norm in the United States for people to judge and make comments on other peoples bodies.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

Chapter 10 was interesting and filled with a lot of information. I thought that this quote was really interesting. “practices and texts involving the representation, alteration, and aestheticization of bodies have been judged by Western standards.” I thought this quote

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

https://t.co/3AJuhrDuwY

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

majority who encounter the restricted mainland internet. I also thought that the part where they talk about at what lengths internet users will go to access blocked information.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

Chapter 14 talked about a lot of issues in China. The most interesting part of the article is when it talked about the two different clases of internet users. The first class is a minority who surfs the global internet with relative case ease. The second class is the hindered

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

interesting because I can imagine that the U.S. does the same thing but in a sneakier way

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

Chapter 31 had a lot of dense information. It was interesting to read about how authorities are “actively blocking websites, filtering keywords, monitoring online postings, harassing dissidents, hiring paid bloggers to influence online discussions.” I thought this was really

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

because of financial stability.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

Chapter 3 in the Routledge Handbook was really interesting. It was interesting because it talked about the asian youth and their experience with adult identity. Young migrants are moving away from the underdeveloped areas to cities. The number one reason for them moving away is

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

because I didn’t know that gaming was a masculine thing because I know a lot of gamers who are females.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

Chapter 14 was really interesting! It was interesting to read about female gamers but a lot of them don’t like to be titled with the word gamer. “Females who do play games seem embarrassed to be defined as gamers and would reject such a masculine title.” This was interesting

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

and other things that could hurt someone else.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

The article by Pulos is really interesting. It was interesting to read about the Blizzard term services. I know that mostly all gaming companies does banning for people online who does bad things. For xbox, you can report players for vulgar language, cheating, harassment,

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

profits.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

The article by Chan is really interesting! This quote from the article was really interesting. “Chinese online game operators usually have to pay a large upfront licensing fee, which can be as high as the $1-2 million US, plus a large portion, as high as 50% of later operating

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

It was interesting to read about gaming activism in China and how that impacts offline and online identity.

[Kalae Wong @WongKalae]

The article by Chee is really interesting. I thought the section where the article was talking about PC bang the most interesting. A question that came to my head reading this is, Do you think a PC bang is considered a workplace?