@RespectElves Poe fills that niche for me, but it's more of arpg, than mmo in my opinion(the only mmo thing is global chat+trading)
if it was single-player, it would've been even cooler tbh.
When the highlight of update day is a funny steam name from an item contributor, and not ANYTHING, A SINGLE THING, from the update itself? My god. What are we doing.
Hey, cool facts time! A different item contributor named Brie (fellow TF2 emporium member with funny name Kendrick Lamar guy aka chickenman) that got several items in the update... is also a known scammer with a history of dropping no-no words! What a surprise, more of my most vocal critics, once again, ousted as hypocrites! Curious! Plus, they pearl-clutched over the same behaviors to get others they personally dislike banned from accessing "community" projects. But when they do these exact same things, if not worse, it's totally okay! Nice hypocrisy, TF2 emporium! Add that to the list of your bullshit.
@bee_fumo mfw i can't use steam to pay for sub, but if i open their website i can pay for sub through steam(?)
also i couldn't find out my birthdate for account, because i made it different and it locks some parts of account, like password etc
Total japanese service death please
@bitchbooi@erstatiz >countries where there's a lot of sun are not on the internet
So you want to get sunburn? 🤔
>vice versa russians and polish
idk about poles, but in Russia there was +35 degree heat for some weeks, that's why people stayed home...
Nintendo has lost another round in its ongoing patent battle with Palworld developer Pocketpair.
A key disagreement was Nintendo’s claim that a 2013 Pokémon fan game should not have been used as prior art because it allegedly infringed Pokémon’s copyright.
The JPO was not convinced. It called Nintendo’s interpretation “a completely unreasonable misunderstanding,” adding that “The mere possibility that the reasons for rejection could be subject to such an unreasonable misunderstanding has no bearing on the assessment of inventive step.”
The examiner also rejected Nintendo’s complaints about references to characters like Ash, Pikachu, and Poké Balls.
The notice said that even if those names were replaced with descriptions like “an object in the form of a boy wearing a red cap” or “a spherical object with a red upper half and a white lower half,” “the logical structure of the grounds for refusal remains unchanged.
Therefore, this argument has no bearing on determining inventive step.”
https://t.co/xivFGUHrA9