@BernieSanders You aren't going to win Bernie. Supported you before but the N in Nasty came out the past years...sadly you and some aren't recognizing ALL the great things the Republicans have done. The disrespect from the Far Left, delusions and arrogance are costing !!! Time to pay up....
@Kanthaswam80359 Well there are Indian CEOs running Google and Microsoft but they are allies of Musk. So we have to be nice to them LOL. But you are right. Thank you for the list!
Do you follow what is going on right now with the President shutting off the likes of Politico? New agencies that show a certain favoritism. The algorithms that are controlled behind the prediction markets are handled by humans correct? LOL. So if a certain keyword or hash tag or whatever has a certain code it can manipulate and I am sure that Kalshi has it set where they know Democrats 🤔 will gamble and spend their money on their platform right? Makes sense. Hahahaha. BTW. Ronald Reagan was a Republican. Not sure if you knew that or not. 💓
You obviously don't comprehend that there are always someone behind the machine that controls the algorithms. Let's take the 2020 Elections or the 2026 Los Angeles Mayor Race. LOL. I am looking at ALL of @Kalshi stats and data and you mean to tell me ALL things Democrat vs Republican the % across the board have an average of over 90%???? 🤔 Someone was not born yesterday!
You obviously don't comprehend that there are always someone behind the machine that controls the algorithms. Let's take the 2020 Elections or the 2026 Los Angeles Mayor Race. LOL. I am looking at ALL of @Kalshi stats and data and you mean to tell me ALL things Democrat vs Republican the % across the board have an average of over 90%???? 🤔 Someone was not born yesterday!
A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life.
At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday."
He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy.
Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system.
He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting.
He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way."
The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.