Yes. Neutralizing two people that already murdered two innocents and were about to victimize a child is morally correct on every single ground.
It is a completely logical, justified reaction and grievance to have.
@99byru The ability to look at this panel and think it shows Eren is a Michael Myers "I kill for the love of the game" psychopath and NOT that it shows his heroism and willingness to punish evil and protect the innocent is just maddening
I do wonder what sort of diseased mind it takes
@minseo96k_ Nope, Erwin's whole goal was about proving people existed outside the walls, to the point that he smiled when learning pure titans used to be human just because it hinted that MIGHT be the case
He would probably be the most opposed to the rumbling out of anyone
정신병잇는사람들은 공감할것같은데
자살보다는 존재소멸을 원하는쪽을 훨씬많이봄.. 죽고싶다와 사라지고싶다는 완전히 다른 감각임 나는 세상에서 내 존재자체를 지우고싶은거임 죽어서 시체를남기고 장례를 치르고 누군가 나를 그리워하게하고싶지않음 깔끔하게 원래 없엇던 존재마냥 사라지고싶음
unfortunately for children parents *do* have rights. custody laws, the “right” to assault children. escapees forced back to their abusers after a simple phone call to the police. trans kids denied healthcare. vaccine denial. this is the deadly reality of “parents rights”.
ADULT BEHAVIORS that are actually signs of Childhood Emotional Neglect (CEN):
• Extreme hyper-independence (refusing to ask for help)
• Feeling guilty or selfish whenever you express a boundary or need
• Going completely blank when someone asks, "What do you feel right now?"
• A quiet, persistent feeling that you are fundamentally "broken"
• Numbing out or retreating into isolation during times of high stress.::. 1//2
Schopenhauer said the animal lacks both anxiety and hope because its consciousness is restricted to what is clearly evident and thus to the present moment: the animal is the present incarnate. I’ve been thinking about it a lot.
The idea of a single male breadwinner for a household is neither what we see in the bible nor almost all of history - its mainly a temporary fantasy created by the conditions of the mid 1900s, a blip on the radar of economic and social realities.
It was a temporary option for a few generations given a brief window of very specific conditions the US and a few other nations enjoyed and experienced.
Outside that, for no one and no where in history was it common.
Because its generally not sustainable - having one person bear all the economic burdens of a large family is an option for very few. In our day, it's often higher end white collar folks still extolling this model - a group by and large whose size is rapidly shrinking.
But having a household where every member, from greatest to least contributes, that is something available to everyone everywhere in everytime.
You can continue to kick against the goads, or you can learn and lean into what the Bible actually teaches - multigenerational productive households. What some have called "the corporate family."
There’s rarely been as much opportunity for such a model as there is again today.
These can look and be structured hundreds of different ways.
It's not a one size fits all, it's a flexible model built to work through the ups and downs of technology and history.
These are a mix of internal and external economy.
They make resilient families and households. A mix of economic and family unity and diversity.
The trans experience is suffering in such a profound way, that simply alleviating that suffering is seen as a luxury, it stops you from wishing more, it stops you for wanting more, it culls your ambitions to wanting nothing but what others already have in the first place
@dfw_ella_ The body type would remain the same, only the hair would change since it mimics the user, it's funny to image if Eren had eaten Annie in season 1 and all his fights thereafter involved essentially a magical girl transformation into a titan