As someone who plays a lot of shooters and extraction shooters, the answer is really easy.
Extraction Shooters have a "rich get richer" mindset. Early on this isn't an issue cause everyone is poor and the game hasn't been "solved" yet. But over time people figure out the mechanics and the sweats start to get into the game.
Now, in normal shooters this isn't a problem. You're in a lobby with maybe 20 people, half of them are on your side and if there is a god sweat, the match is only 10 minutes tops anyways so just tough it out and move on. The next game you'll still be exactly where you were.
In extraction shooters, the lobbies have 30-40 people in it and ALL of them are against you. Not only that you just died last round so you have very little gear to start with. Now you have to deal with 2 god sweats running around the map killing everyone just to do it and losing even more gear which makes you even poorer.
Extraction shooters are "late stage solved it" gaming. Some games need to waffle on for years before they're only a community of "solved it" gamers that prevent new players from joining, but extraction shooters speed run that cycle in a month or two.
Please understand, if you send me a business proposition about inflicting AI shit on my userbase, I don't just want you to fuck off. I want things to happen to you that I cannot enumerate here because sharing them would result in my account being suspended.
AI has irreversibly ruined human history: an internet that took decades to build.
The amount of ai content means future generations looking for genuine photographs, research materials, medical papers will forever have to wade through artificial salt-and-pepper we can't separate.
USPS is a service for the American people. It is not a business to be run for profit.
It is the only mailing service that cannot cut off delivery to certain locations simply due to it not being “cost effective”
your critique of ai cannot be entrenched in aesthetics because there will be a time when you see an ai image or hear an ai song and think "that looks/sounds good". your critique of ai must always be entrenched in the poisonous effect it has on people's brains and the planet.