@Lizzie02563572@stillvaunted That’s absolutely not true lmao - many of us have interests in history but to pretend like that many people earnestly obsess over the romain empire is silly
@petrograd_2@nanacateee It was impossible for her to kill her kids but also she was depressed and therefore justified in killing them
I am a reasonable and sound-minded human being
@givetoginger@sandpaperwaffle@nanacateee No, that is not true at all. Literally what the fuck are you talking about. Even if you are not of sound mind you still face punishment.
@nanacateee How do you not realize that you are arguing that
1. She didnt do it - that its impossible for her to have done it
AND
2. She was depressed from having babies and that means she was justified in killing them
You are arguing that she didnt do it but also she was fine to do it
@givetoginger@sandpaperwaffle@nanacateee ok and? she still did it and still must face justice what the fuck is wrong with you?
if a man has all these things and shoots a school you dont just finger wag and let them go you retard
@nanacateee You are insane for thinking that she couldnt have done it when she literally admitted to it in addition to a plethora of evidence.
Having a baby doesnt justify or mean you can kill one or all 3 you psycho
@nanacateee Clancy admits she killed her children, so “the evidence says she couldn’t have done it” is nonsense. The issue is whether postpartum psychosis made her unable to understand the wrongfulness—not whether she did it. Being postpartum doesn’t make you a forensic psychiatrist.