@garyleff@MCCCANM@Delta@elonmusk@garyleff, you do realize that you just admitted to throwing a tantrum... throwing a political hissy-fit. How the heck did you become a CEO? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
As released by the White House and reported by AP, here is the guest list for tonight's State Dinner.
(List continues in 1st reply)
President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump
President Xi Jinping and Madame Peng Liyuan
Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his spouse, Jeanette Rubio
Chief of Staff Susie Wiles
U.S. Ambassador to China David Perdue and his spouse, Bonnie Perdue
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and his spouse, John Freeman
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
Jamieson Greer, United States trade representative, and his spouse, Marlo Greer
Cai Qi, chief of staff to Xi
Wang Yi, CPC Political Bureau Central Committee member
He Lifeng, China’s vice premier of State Council
Zheng Shanjie, chairman of China’s National Development and Reform Commission
Wang Wentao, China’s minister of commerce
Ma Zhaoxu, China’s executive vice foreign minister
Xie Feng, Chinese ambassador to the United States, and his spouse, Wang Dan
Ivanka Trump and her daughter, Arabella Kushner
Eric Trump and his spouse, Lara Trump
Tiffany Trump and her spouse, Michael Boulos
Viktor Knavs, father of Melania Trump
Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, and his spouse, Lori Huang
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta
Lisa Su, CEO of Advanced Micro Devices, and her spouse, Daniel Lin
Tim Cook, executive chairman of the board of Apple
John F.W. Rogers, executive vice president of Goldman Sachs
Lynn Martin, president of the New York Stock Exchange
Linda Mills, president of New York University
Eric Yuan, CEO of Zoom
Tang Fangyu, director of the Central Policy Research Office of the CPC Central Committee
Mr. Lan Fo’an, China’s Minister of Finance
Zhou Hongxu, deputy director of the General Office of the CPC Central Committee
Lyu Luhua, secretary to Xi
Hong Lei, Chinese assistant foreign minister
Cai Wei, Chinese assistant foreign minister
Mao Ning, director general of China’s Department of Press, Communication and Public Diplomacy
Zhang Quan, secretary to Peng
Zhang Yongchao, deputy director general of China’s Department of North American and Oceanian Affairs
Kelly Ortberg, CEO of Boeing
Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock
Stephen Schwarzman, CEO of Blackstone
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI
Greg Brockman, president and co-founder of OpenAI, and his wife, Anna Brockman
Dr. Miriam Adelson, controlling shareholder of Las Vegas Sands
Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google/Alphabet, and his partner, Gerelyn Gilbert-Soto
Satya Nadella, chairman and CEO of Microsoft
Jim Taiclet, president and CEO of Lockheed Martin
Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google
Larry Culp, CEO of GE Aerospace
Sanjay Mehrotra, CEO of Micron, and his spouse, Sangeeta Mehrota
Cristiano Amon, CEO of Qualcomm
Jeff Bezos, chairman of Amazon, and his spouse, Lauren Sanchez-Bezos
Jeff Yass, co-founder of Susquehanna International Group
Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase
Michael Dell, CEO of Dell Technologies, and his spouse, Susan Dell
Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors, and her spouse, Anthony Barra
David Solomon, CEO of Goldman Sachs
Jane Fraser, CEO of Citigroup
Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla
Darren Woods, CEO of ExxonMobil, and his spouse, Kathy Woods
Chief Justice John Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court, and his spouse, Jane Sullivan Roberts
Justice Amy Coney Barrett of the U.S. Supreme Court, and her spouse, Jesse Barrett
Justice Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Supreme Court, and his spouse, Ashley Estes
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., and his spouse, Kelly Johnson
Bret Baier, Fox News host, and his spouse, Amy Baier
Laura Ingraham, Fox News host
Rep. Richard McCormick, R-Ga.
Jesse Watters, Fox News host, and his spouse, Emma Watters
David Ellison, CEO of Paramount Skydance, and his spouse, Sandra Lynn Ellison
Kevin Warsh, chairman of the Federal Reserve, and his spouse, Jane Lauder
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and his spouse, Allison Lutnick
Continued below:
@PatrickByrne What do we do about candidates who already won their primaries through fraud and are now on the general election ballot?
No matter what happens from here, this will not be a fair election. IMHO
Does the 1st Amendment give the news media the right to cover a White House story if the media itself changes the original or true story to something that makes the listener think differently?
**No.** The First Amendment protects the press from *government* punishment or prior restraint for covering White House stories. It does not require the coverage to match an official version, stay “original,” or avoid changing how listeners interpret events.
The relevant text is short: Congress shall make no law “abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” That bars the government from generally stopping publication, fining outlets for the story, or criminalizing the reporting because officials dislike the framing. Editorial choices—what facts to emphasize, what context to add or omit, how to interpret events—are core protected speech. Courts have long treated that as the press’s job, not the government’s.
### What the First Amendment does *not* do
It does not create a right to fabricate facts of consequence without consequences, nor a guaranteed seat in the White House briefing room.
- **Defamation remains available.** If an outlet publishes a *false statement of fact* that harms reputation, it can be sued. For public officials and public figures (the President, senior White House staff), the plaintiff must prove “actual malice”: the outlet knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for whether it was true. That is a high bar by design. Honest error, sloppy reporting, or a different interpretation of the same events usually does not meet it.
- **Access to the building is not a constitutional entitlement.** The White House does not have to open its doors. Once it does so on a regular basis for credentialed journalists, it cannot revoke access based on the viewpoint or content of the coverage. Courts have treated that as viewpoint discrimination. Recent attempts to exclude specific outlets over “fake news” claims have drawn exactly that criticism from First Amendment lawyers and press organizations.
- **Broadcast-only rules exist but are narrow.** The FCC has a rarely used “news distortion” policy that requires proof of *deliberate, intentional falsification* of a news event, not mere bias or spin. It does not apply to print, most digital outlets, or ordinary framing differences.
### Practical line
Changing “the original or true story” so that listeners draw a different conclusion is usually protected if it stays in the realm of selection, emphasis, opinion, or incomplete but not knowingly false reporting. Knowingly inventing events or statements of fact about public officials can still trigger civil liability (hard as that is to win) or, for licensed broadcasters, possible FCC scrutiny. The First Amendment stops the government from being the editor; it does not make the press infallible or immune from private lawsuits.
JUAN SHARES WITH US THE TRUE MEANING OF THE Q OPERATION...
EVERYONE NEEDS TO HEAR THIS AND BETTER YET FULLY CONPREHEND THE Q PLAN...
WE MUST BE ENVOLVED IN OUR NEW REPUBLIC AT OUR LOCAL COMMUNITIES & STATES ...
"OPERATION MARKSMAN" IS COMING SOON...HOLDING OUR CITIES, COUNTIES, SCHOOL BOARDS AND STATES ACCOUNTABLE BY "WE THE PEOPLE".
@JuanOSavin107
BREAKING NEWS: I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has entered into an Agreement with The Kingdom of Denmark, and Greenland, that gives the United States permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland, completely addressing ALL of our many U.S. concerns. There will be NO COST to the United States! At my direction, we worked with representatives of Denmark and Greenland to guarantee that the United States will FOREVER have the complete ability to do what is necessary in Greenland in order to secure and defend the security of Greenland, and the United States of America. Additionally, from now on, no U.S. adversary can EVER have a base in Greenland, have a military presence in Greenland, or make sensitive investments in Greenland, without our express written approval. For over 100 years, Presidents have known the strategic importance of Greenland, but NONE of them were able to do anything about it. I am proud to be the President that permanently and conclusively addressed this very important situation. This is an “Infinite Life” Agreement, there is no end! We are very honored and proud of what has just taken place, and everything agreed to today will be cherished by the American People. We will immediately begin the process of developing a large Military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland, of which there are many. We will work with the people of Greenland in its development and construction. This solution is a great one for the United States of America, Denmark, Greenland, and all of our Allies. We look forward to working with the wonderful people of Denmark and Greenland toward a magnificent future with respect to this large, and highly strategic, parcel of land. We will be very protective of it! This is a dream come true for the United States of America, one that is very important, historic, and special. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
@elonmusk Hot Springs, AR woods. Clear zenith over the house, but 75–85' oaks block NE and 65'+ trees sit within 10' east and 50' south. Can’t guy a tall pole here.
Dose the new satellites give us a real chance looking more overhead, or is the wide FOV still required?
@elonmusk Hot Springs, AR woods. Clear zenith over the house, but 75–85' oaks block NE, and 65'+ trees sit within 10' east and 50' south of the home. Can’t guy a tall pole here.
Do the new satellites give us a real chance looking more overhead, or is the wide FOV still required?
@PatrickByrne You're a great guy, Patrick, but it appears that you still do not fully understand what President Trump has been setting up all along. I do agree that it would be very advantageous to him if he was able to get 100% good intel, but the deep state is awfully deep!