@NovusOrdoWatch As a spokesman with enough professional coaching, perhaps, due to his status with "conservatives". As a mastermind, no way. The man has literally zero sense for anything media-related as he has repeatedly proven over the years.
“Three Saints,” said our Lord to Saint Bridget of Sweden, “have been more pleasing to Me than all others: Mary My Mother, John the Baptist, and Mary Magdalene.”
— Excerpt from Butler’s Lives of the Saints
St. Mary Magdalene, pray for us.
@poperespecter1 This man is a manifest heretic pretending to be a successor of Blessed Peter. To promote him with all this syrupy sycophancy is to play straight into the hands of him who prowls about seeking the ruin of souls.
"Absolutely Null & Utterly Void" by †Fr. Cekada (2003): https://t.co/vQU5h0uJMu
"Why the New Bishops Are Not True Bishops" (2006): https://t.co/9uBmLMJQFY
"Still Null & Still Void" (2007): https://t.co/vjyQwE0Rdm
"New Bishops, Empty Tabernacle" (2007): https://t.co/Rir9D6RJ0Q
@cengime@pluant When did I say I was an expert on it? You apparently claim to have found a dogma against the the possibility of a prolonged vacancy in it. Why refuse to offer corroborating sources besides an entry in a Latin dictionary? Why not put forth your case if you have one? 🤷♂️
@EricRSammons Odd comparison. Transgenderism denies what the eyes can see; sedevacantism affirms what the Church has always taught. If anyone here is being asked to ignore reality, it’s whoever thinks heresy no longer disqualifies a man from the papacy.
@EricRSammons This is true, but what about the trangressions of that Novus Ordo sect you so ardently cling to? An emperor who has no clothes and fornicates with heretics and apostates, enabling the very perversions you decry with unbridled relativism and false mercy? 🤔
@poperespecter1 Not to defend the SSPX which is also confused but this man is no bishop 1) bc NO orders are invalid, and 2) even if he had orders, he is in open communion with the non-Catholic VII sect which means he holds no office ipso facto. His opinion is worthless.
@cengime@pluant What do you say it means precisely? That no single generation will pass without there being a Roman Pontiff? Is this the only interpretation of the phase? If yes, given the many possible meaning of the word ævum, why? What sources confirm your interpretation of it being a dogma?
@cengime@pluant And if you want to talk about clarity, don't forget that you consistently refused to point to any theologians of repute or other sources confirming the "dogma" you invented and tried to reframe it as some lexical dispute.
@cengime@pluant I don't know about you, but I have multiple obligations besides this platform. Believe me, I'm getting to it. Perhaps it won't impress you, seeing you are as snide as they come, but I won't let this invented "dogma" of yours stand. 2/2
@cengime@pluant This is the bone of contention. I say contention bc you insert the meaning of lifetime/generation here where it is not warranted and make something the impossibility of an extended vacancy into a dogma, whereas it is not. 1/2
@cengime@pluant ...to state your position openly before we begin, but your behavior thus far leads me to believe you won't. My impression is you're more in this for being contentious than anything else. Perhaps you're willing to dispelled such suspicions. We'll see. 2/2
@cengime@pluant I'm quaking. The Latin is clear enough, but I'm more than willing to delve into this and the false assumptions you only dare insinuate instead of proclaim openly, viz. it is of faith that there need be a Roman Pontiff in every generation. You're more than welcome... 1/2
@poperespecter1 I've noticed. Bergoglio always gave me the impression of being miserable. Even his phony laughter for the cameras couldn't disguise it. 🤷♂️