No one with a basic education would answer that destruction, murder, vice, and sadism are essential dynamics within their "proper daily life."
Yet we know what these calamities are.
It is a cognitive fallacy to view real calamity as a necessary evil for maintaining dynamism.
بیمارستان باید امنترین نقطه هر سرزمینی باشد؛ بهویژه وقتی پناه کودکانی است که با سرطان میجنگند.حمله به نقاط نزدیک بیمارستان بقایی اهواز، جایی که کودکان مبتلا به سرطان تحت درمانند، درتعارض باحقوق بشراست.
قدردان کادر سلامت هستیم که زیر سایه تهدید،خدمت را متوقف نکردند.
Trump has announced that the United States will strike Iran's Pickaxe Mountain "very heavily" and "pretty soon." Under the IAEA's own legal framework, this raises a serious issue. The prohibition is not limited to an actual attack on a nuclear installation; a threat of armed attack against a nuclear facility is itself treated as unlawful.
For four decades, the IAEA General Conference has affirmed by consensus that attacks on peaceful nuclear facilities — and threats to carry them out — violate the UN Charter, international law, and the IAEA Statute. The principle was established after Israel's 1981 attack on Iraq's Osirak reactor, when the Security Council, through Resolution 487, condemned the strike as a clear violation of the UN Charter and affirmed the applicable prohibition.
The General Conference then went further. In 1985 it declared that any armed attack on, or threat against, nuclear facilities constituted a violation of the Charter, international law, and the Statute. In 1990 it stated that a threat of armed attack against a safeguarded nuclear facility created a situation requiring immediate action by the Security Council, a position reaffirmed in 2009.
This is not a fringe interpretation or an argument resting on political rhetoric. It reflects a position adopted repeatedly by the IAEA across decades. The legal issue arises not only when the first bomb falls, but the moment a credible threat is made.
Two questions therefore demand an answer.
First, why has the Security Council not convened? In 1981, faced with an accomplished attack on a reactor, it acted through Resolution 487. Today, faced with an openly declared threat against a safeguarded facility — precisely the situation the General Conference in 1990 said required immediate Council action — it remains silent. If the Osirak precedent carries any weight, the threat alone is enough to place the matter before it.
Second, why is the Director General, @rafaelmgrossi, not addressing this urgently? The Agency's emergency mechanisms are already monitoring developments in Iran, and he has a clear duty to act. If the IAEA's established principles are to mean anything, the Director General cannot remain silent while a direct, public threat is made against a nuclear installation.
🔷 If you expect your diplomats to abandon the field out of fear of the enemy’s deception, they certainly will not do so.
🔷 Supporting diplomats is a complement to supporting the defenders of the homeland.
🔷 Diplomacy is another fortress for defending Iran.
🔷 Defending Iran is not carried out solely on the military battlefield.
🎥 پزشکیان در همایش روز ملی صنعت و معدن:
🔹خیلی حرف ها در دلم است که نمی خواهم بزنم و نخواهم زد چرا که احساس می کنم وحدت از بین می رود.
🔹من حاضرم وحدت را بپذیرم ولی تمام آن سختی ها را به جان بخرم.
#پزشکیان#رئیسجمهور#انسجام_ملی
The unilateral imposition of U.S. doctrine on Iran has continued to hinder efforts to resolve the situation and has in no way contributed to the establishment of a new international order.
Iran has historically been an extremely reasonable and rational country when it comes to ratifying peacetime maritime law.
Even during the clash last June, they responded with utmost rationality and refrained from hastily shifting to wartime measures.
کتبت في مجلة فورين أفيرز:
ينبغي لدول المنطقة أن تستخدم نفوذها لتعزيز استقرار الدول الأخرى.
وإذا استطاعت المنطقة بناء مؤسسات مشتركة فعّالة، فقد تشهد تنمية غير مسبوقة.
لن يكون هذا سهلا، ولكن لا ينبغي لدول المنطقة أن تبقى أسيرة ماضيها العنيف.
https://t.co/UcBMGpSNiU
President Trump: Instead of insulting Europeans, why don’t we learn something from them.
In Denmark, for example, everyone is guaranteed healthcare, college education is free, parents receive one year of paid family leave and workers don’t make less than $22 an hour.
When all nations are able to bring criminals to justice, regardless of their status, the true frontier of humanity will be opened up.
Until then, after all, we are unfortunately merely an extension of primitive society, ah Mary Anne…