Well it depends what the combination of the two is, we’re not talking about a top 5% status guy who’s ugly vs a top 5% looks guy who has 1 follower.
My argument is that when you combine the two, status weighs more strongly.
For example, top 10% looks, top 1% status beats top 10% status, top 1% looks.
Looks are important but by far secondary when compared to status.
The looksmaxxers who actually break through and swim in pussy aren’t the ones who stay unknown, it’s the ones who become famous and known for looksmaxxing.
But since all they talk about is looks (which is what got them famous), people wrongly assume that it is exclusively their looks which got them to the point where women are swooning over them.
The way it really works is: being good looking —> allows you to blow up on social media as a looksmaxxer ——-> status ——-> insane amounts of women.
Good looking non famous guys will still get girls but not an extremely impressive amount.
The amount of exposure a guy with top 5% status gets will get him more women than a top 5% looks guy who’s relatively unknown.
Doesn’t matter who girls would “pick”, it’s simple math. A less attractive guy getting seen by 1000 women will have more options than a more attractive guy getting seen by 100.
@abheee8 Yea that’s why I said if the cope somehow lands you where you want to be in life, keep doing it. If it doesn’t then it’s not a good cope.
In most cases guys will get way better results by assuming attraction and assuming they are attractive than the complete opposite.
Coping is better than not coping 99% of the time.
I am pro cope.
If the cope somehow lands you where you want to be in life, continue to shamelessly cope.
Intellectuals can be their own worst enemy.
It’s like the IQ bell curve meme where:
- people on the low end don’t even realize they’re coping (and still get results accidentally)
- people in the middle realize when they’re coping and then stop
- people on the high end realize when they’re coping but continue.
Examples of useful copes:
- Believing you are the most attractive person in any room
- Believing she will fall for you as soon as you open your mouth
- Assuming every woman you talk to is attracted to you
- Believing that your inner state will be reflected externally (arguably not even a cope if you’re not a materialist)
There is an argument to be made that no matter what you believe or what position you hold, there is a cope in there somewhere. Even the biggest doomers and genetic determinists are coping. Using an ideology to constantly justify a lack of autonomy.
So you might as well cope usefully rather than uselessly.
If you’re no longer talking to her and you still think about her a lot even though it’s been weeks or months since you last spoke, remember she’s not spending a second thinking about you.
How do I know this? Because women don’t have discipline. If she was thinking about you like that, she would’ve texted you weeks ago. She would’ve been in your DMs by now. You can still think about her a lot and control yourself not to text her, but she cannot do the same. Her silence DEFINITELY means you are not on her mind at all and she’s living her life as if you didn’t exist. Not a second of her time wasted on you.
With this in mind, realize how bad it is that you’re wasting your time letting someone affect your life while you are not affecting theirs in the slightest.
Feeling sorry for yourself won’t make her notice you, but forgetting about her and moving on might.
Women do not care about your body transformation or rags to riches story.
They care only about one thing: you current self. They don’t care about what it took to get to the finish line, just that you are currently at the finish line.
A pretty boy trust fund kid who never had to struggle or work a day in his life will still get more pussy and passive attraction than any rags to riches rugged guy who worked his way up and makes that a part of his identity because women reward guys who appear natural and like they “just always had it”.
Any high effort you had to put into getting anything should always be concealed and downplayed.
You are a natural, you were just born with it. That’s as far as women need to know.
@thealexgreaner “The right woman will”, then proceeds to say “nobody cares about where you came from or how you had to get it”.
Contradicting yourself in the same sentence is very impressive. Keep it up.
6’5 Chad larping as a deep philosophy bro basement dwelling incel and it worked out very well for him.
It’s disrespectful to the real basement dwelling incels who really are about that life.
Chad larps as one of them and blows up, no wonder why people are so black pilled these days.
You know damn well this guy is not deep, goes outside, fucks girls, socializes, and makes a lot of money.
Never believe these “I’m one of you” type of guys unless they really look the part.
Never trust an E-girl with an anime profile picture who uses discord.
If there is one archetype of woman I would advise men to stay away from, it would be this one.
The downfall of every streamer or chronically online guy who can’t talk to women in real life can be traced back to this kind of woman. Incels and incel adjacent men (streamers and Vtuber watchers) are particularly prone to the consequences of dealing with one.
They get baited in by her anime voice and soft persona, until the DM’s get leaked and she paints you with whatever brush she feels like.
Also, the morality of monogamy is not as clear cut as say, the morality of slavery or murder unless you’re extremely religious.
Some people make the argument that monogamy is not inherently immoral with great points, but anyone who says that about murder or slavery would be laughed out of the room.
Monogamy is objectively better than polygamy for society, but the reason both men and women advocate for it is usually always some form of personal cope.
Women love advocating for monogamy because they want Chad, who can sleep with every girl, to commit. They want to have their cake and eat it too. To get Chad, but also to not just be a hookup to him.
Men love advocating for monogamy because they want to make their limitations seem virtuous and noble. Most men are monogamous because they have no other choice, but they act like it’s some moral decision. But in reality if they could sleep with many women, most of them definitely would.
False equivalence. You don’t have an innate urge to murder like you do have an urge to fuck a bunch of women unless you’re a psychopath.
One is something we are biologically compelled to do, the other is something that is easy not to do even if you have the power to do it because the majority of us aren’t itching to kill someone.
The logic does follow, you’re just throwing out false analogies.
Women are actually far more receptive to most men’s advances than the zeitgeist would have you believe but the consequences of being turned down are so catastrophic that men have to basically just default to the position that women hate them at a baseline not because it’s correct but because it’s safe