yiannis exarhopoulos

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@sakis7057 @a_loverdos δεν είπε κάτι τέτοιο, μαλακίες γράφεις από το παχύ σου έντερο .

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@Adalakogeorgos σύντροφε Μαλακογιώργο , αυτοί είναι κινέζοι , μήπως κάνεις κάποιο λάθος.

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@oberon_new @Odymag357 @thanosplevris ενώ η ΝΔ , που βάρεσε κανονιά 600 εκατομμύρια , που ακούστηκε στην Παταγονία , ξέρουμε καλά πού τα βρήκε , δεν μάς τρώει η αναρώτηση . σωστός ο συνέλληνας 😉

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@AdonisGeorgiadi η ευρώπη μας ..

https://t.co/PDY4jyiVqA

[Chris del Papà @himeroscr]

Βέλγιο 🇧🇪 Λιέγη 😡
Ομάδα Antifa μπούκαρε στήν αίθουσα διδασκαλίας τού Πανεπιστημίου τήν ώρα τού μαθήματος, για να ρίξει τούρτες στο πρόσωπο τού καθηγητή Damian Ernst μόνο κ μόνο επειδή συνεργάζεται με τήν γαλλική εταιρεία Thales‼️
Μολύνθηκε και το Βέλγιο🤬

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@EFSYNTAKTON έτσι γίνονταν κάποτε οι σωστές δουλει΄ς. αλλά χαλάσανε και οι κομμουνιστες ...

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@MegaTvOfficial

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@Grinchzilla @kmitsotakis @sofiazacharaki καμία απολύτως, η βλαμμενη παραμενει ακλόνητη
https://t.co/89kfWUXQ2f

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@SMpliat μπήκανε με τα όπλα στο εργοτάξιο της "ελληνικός χρυσός, τα κάψανε όλα , και μετά βγήκαν όλοι αθώοι στα δικαστήρια.... σίγουρα, τέλειο μέρος για μπίζνες η Ελλάδα . όπως το λες , ακριβώς όμως. 20 χρόνια μετα, τώρα ξεκινάει η εξόρυξη.

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@Maria_rvng περιμένω να δω το βράδυ των εκλογών τι θα λες ...

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@Vkikilias εσύ δεν ήξερες να πας στο μνημείο , να τραβάς τα βυζιά σου , και να κάνεις στενοχωρημενα μουτσούνια , σαν το ρενάκι ?

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@Cynaegeirus2 φαντάσου ο Λώλος ....

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

https://t.co/KYs2swMpOL

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@AdonisGeorgiadi πρόκειται για τον αντιφασιστα δολοφονο της θεσπρωτίας. τι να πρωτοθαυμάσει κανείς ?

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@a_avlonitis https://t.co/jHXPHt0518

[peaky blinders @peakybl05084561]

Η συλλογική μνήμη ενάντια στη λήθη.Παυλαρα χτυπάς δυνατά στις καρδιές μας γαμησε τις πλάτες. 18-9-2013 ΔΕΝ ΞΕΧΝΑΜΕ ΔΕΝ ΣΥΓΧΩΡΟΎΜΕ. #φυσσας

[Miltiadis Benakis @BenakisM]

Σοβαρά ρε παιδιά πιστεύετε με τέτοιες δηλώσεις θα πάρει η ΝΔ αυτοδυναμία;

[Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 @Kristof_Poland]

The Toolkit to Understand the Long March

Gramsci designed the strategy. Dutschke named it. A generation executed it. And most people still cannot name what happened – because the mechanisms were never labeled clearly enough to be recognized in real time. Here they are.

Cultural Hegemony – and Cultural Marxism

Gramsci’s core concept. The ruling class maintains power not through force but through controlling the categories of thought. You don’t need to censor if people can’t think outside the approved framework. When the working class accepts that the existing order is simply how things are – no force is required. The revolution requires changing these categories first. Control what is thinkable and you control everything downstream. This is not propaganda – propaganda is visible. Cultural hegemony is invisible because it operates at the level of assumption, not argument. The Frankfurt School took this concept and applied it systematically to Western civilization – which is what Cultural Marxism means: not economic Marxism but the same logic of oppressor and oppressed, applied to culture, identity, and the institutions that transmit values.

The Long March

Dutschke’s application. Don’t storm the institutions – occupy them from within. Get the job in the editorial office. Get the position on the faculty. Get appointed to the curriculum committee. Replace the people who run the institutions with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and wait. The institutions will produce different graduates, who will produce different hires, who will produce different policy. No visible moment of rupture. The march took fifty years. It worked.

How Institutions Fall

What the march looks like from inside the institution – the mechanism of institutional takeover. Not dramatic – incremental. First one appointment. Then the hiring committee. The committee shifts the culture. The culture shifts what is rewarded, what is punished, what questions are asked, which answers are acceptable. Then the output changes. Self-reinforcing once started. Irreversible without deliberate effort. Most institutions in the West are somewhere on this curve.

The Ratchet

Every progressive policy advance is permanent. Every conservative advance is temporary. The ratchet clicks only one way. Why? Because the institutions that implement policy are captured – so when a conservative government wins an election, it changes the government but not the civil service, not the judiciary, not the regulatory apparatus, not the media. The direction continues. The ratchet holds. Elections become a choice between the speed of change, not its direction. This is what Gramsci predicted and what we are living.

The Gleichschaltung

The Nazi term – but the mechanism is universal. The coordination of all institutions in a single direction. Not through central command but through aligned incentives – the ESG score, the DEI requirement, the grant condition, the advertiser pressure. Each institution coordinates voluntarily because the cost of not coordinating is higher than the cost of compliance. No conspiracy is required. The incentive structure does the work. Every corporation, university, media organization, and foundation moves in the same direction – not because someone ordered it but because everyone can see what happens to those who don’t.

The Overton Window

The range of ideas considered acceptable in public discourse at any given moment. Not fixed – moved deliberately, in both directions, by funding positions that seem radical until they shift what seems moderate. Yesterday’s unthinkable becomes today’s controversial becomes tomorrow’s mainstream becomes next year’s obvious. The mechanism by which open borders, gender ideology, and the managed demolition of national sovereignty all moved from impossible to inevitable within a generation. Both sides can use it. One side understood it first and funded it systematically.

Preference Falsification

Everyone privately disagrees – but publicly conforms, because each person believes everyone else agrees. The emperor’s new clothes at civilizational scale. The system maintains itself through the illusion of consensus that nobody actually holds. Until something breaks the illusion – and then the cascade is sudden and total, because the preference falsification ends simultaneously. This is what happened in 1989 in Eastern Europe. The regimes looked solid until they didn’t. They didn’t fall – they largely evaporated. The same dynamic is visible in the West today. The polls that show what people say. The anonymous polls that show what they think. The gap between them is the measure of the pressure.

Manufactured Consensus

The deliberate production of the appearance of expert agreement where none exists. The summary that contradicts the underlying report. The "scientific consensus" on topics where the science is actively contested. The fact-checker who checks framing not facts. The peer review process captured by the same ideological network it reviews. Not a conspiracy – a coordination problem solved by shared incentives. Everyone in the system benefits from the consensus. Nobody benefits from challenging it.

Lawfare

The use of legal process as a weapon – not to win cases but to impose cost, delay, and reputational damage. The process is the punishment. File the complaint, trigger the investigation, generate the headline, force the legal defense. The target is damaged whether they win or lose. Used against political opponents, journalists, platforms, and individuals whose activities threaten the network. The legal system was designed to protect the individual from the state. Lawfare inverts it.

Repressive Tolerance

Marcuse, 1965. The philosophical justification for all of the above. Tolerating wrong ideas is itself oppression – therefore suppressing them is liberation. True tolerance requires the intolerance of the intolerant. The left decides which ideas are intolerant. The framework is circular by design: you cannot escape it from inside, because the escape is itself classified as intolerance. This is why cancel culture does not feel like censorship to the people practicing it. It feels like tolerance. Marcuse taught them that it was.

These are not separate phenomena. They are a system – each mechanism reinforcing the others. Cultural hegemony creates the assumptions. The long march captures the institutions. Elite capture makes it self-reinforcing. The Gleichschaltung coordinates the institutions that haven’t been individually captured. The ratchet makes it permanent. The Overton Window moves the acceptable range. Preference falsification hides the resistance. Manufactured consensus provides the legitimacy. Lawfare suppresses the opposition. Repressive tolerance provides the philosophical cover.

The system has one vulnerability: it requires the illusion of consensus to function. Name the mechanisms clearly enough, in public, and the preference falsification begins to crack. Which is why the Counter-Reformation moves so fast against the platforms that name things.

You are reading this on the one that does.

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@paliakaravana59 @tomanifesto @AdonisGeorgiadi βέβαια , υπάρχει η εκτίμηση ότι στο τέλος του 2026 , θα πέσουμε στην δεύτερη θέση .

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@paliakaravana59 @tomanifesto @AdonisGeorgiadi το μόνο που βρήκα είναι αυτό. 1ο τρίμηνο 2026 eurostat

[yiannis exarhopoulos @YExarhopoulos]

@paliakaravana59 @tomanifesto @AdonisGeorgiadi μα δεν έχουν βγει ακόμα τα στοιχεία του 2026.