@RandPaul A simple ban would cause arguments like this. But when one understands what the technology behind a platform can do, then one should really consider what society is dealing with. Call for laws to regulate the technology in society`s interests.
@ThisLoudIsFire@EverydayBastiat Capitalism doesn't look after the poor. So if you are poor, capitalism thinks it's all your fault.
Socialism promises to look after the poor, but only when there are no higher or greater common goals that come first.
This paper, published this week, shows that PGRMC1 Y180 motif (acquired along with the gastrulation organiser in evolution) is a major regulator of genomic CpG epigenetic status. So many thanks to my collaborators!
https://t.co/FMxqDZXPtz
@7NewsSydney Unrealistic thinking. Your only choice is between giving up or keeping going. International students need rich parents who also are willing to pay for their adult kids.
@CBSNews The current situation is not supprising. It is hard to understand what American people expect to happen when a country allows lethal weapons to be possessed by common people and the police force. They are all lethal weapons holders.
@smithoons@TheEconomist If you realise that international flights can take people any where in a few hours , then anywhere could be happening in the same time period . Only virus genomic DNA sequences would be able to tell which is the earliest one.
@australian Putting education in the market means you appeal to students whose parents are rich enough and more importantly willing to pay for their kids.
Possibly that is why you got a high proportion of international students from these two in the first place.
@RichAFerguson@australian How? If your universities are making money from international students, then you need students who can afford to come. It is possible that's why students are mostly from these two in the first place.