@MasterMaliq Also, getting a huge folliwing on X wont save you.
Why not read the comments instead of using them to get engagement? Your disingenuousness is shameful
@aaron_p_edwards I think we just need to read the Bible to know who Jesus would be hanging out with (Tommy Robinson...those who have been fotrgiven much love much) and who he would be saying stuff about hypocrisy to (Williams, Mullaly)
"Perhaps if the Church of England had spent rather more of the last generation preaching Jesus Christ with confidence, ordinary Britons would not now be rediscovering Christianity through political movements rather than their parish churches.
Britain is spiritually starving. And those who presided over decades of Christian retreat from British public life should exercise considerable caution before condemning the people now stumbling through the ruins looking for the Cross.
Before you condemn them, Lord Williams, meet them. Before questioning their motives, listen to them. You may discover something rather more uncomfortable than an army of extremists: A spiritually hungry people searching for something the institutional Church failed to give them."
- @BishopDewar 🔥🔥🔥
Here’s the whole case for why I left Islam in a few sentences.
Share this one when someone asks why you left.
Muslims said the Bible was corrupted and the Quran corrected it.
So I tested it, story by story.
The Bible names the son (Isaac); the Quran leaves it blank.
The Bible weighs silver in shekels (period-correct); the Quran counts dirhams (1,000 years too early).
The Bible says Pharaoh’s daughter (confirmed in Exodus AND Acts); the Quran says wife.
The Bible keeps the rainbow, the Passover, the crucifixion; the Quran deletes the grace.
The Quran’s extra details, the fire, the raven, the jinn, the clay birds, all trace to folklore the Bible never held.
And my own Quran told people to uphold and trust the Gospel (Surah 5:47), the same Gospel we have from centuries before Islam.
Every test pointed one way: the Bible is the original, and it’s about Jesus.
“Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures.., and He was raised on the third day.” 1 Corinthians 15:3-4.
I didn’t leave Islam on a whim.
I left because I ran the test honestly, and the evidence led to a cross and an empty tomb.
And the One who was on that cross, and walked out of that tomb, is calling you, too.
That’s why I left.
And that’s why I can never go back.
The “Christianity is dead in Britain” line is nonsense.
Repeat a lie often enough and people start treating it like fact.
Meanwhile, young men are walking into churches. Bibles are being bought. People are asking serious questions about Jesus again.
The establishment might have moved on from Christianity.
Britain hasn’t.
Something is stirring — and it’s getting harder to ignore. 🇬🇧✝️
Rector Paul De Sutter, who goes by 'Petra' nowadays (shielding him from criticism), is an insult to science itself.
He hates real scientists and truth. Paul even denies the existence of binary biological sex. When I had a debate with him on national television about transgenderism, he lost badly and tried to get me kicked out of university out of spite.
Paul, leading member of the far-left Green Party, is also extremely incompetent. During his four year tenure as minister responsible for state companies, our two biggest state companies Bpost (postal services) and Proximus (telecom services) lost respectively 80% and 65% of their market value.
Paul did not only commit plagiarism himself, he is also is guilty of everything he accuses others of. In 2024, days before the election, he accused me of having stalked and threatened a minor 'trans boy' (= girl). This was a complete and utter lie, but in collaboration with the media, the lie ran for days, influencing the election outcome. After I filed a complaint with police for defamation, Paul quietly retracted his statements, but never corrected them. That's how much of a coward he is. In any case, he should go to jail for deliberately, wrongfully accusing a political opponent of a heinous crime.
Paul's university, Ghent University, illegally kicked me out as a student and as a member of the Board of Governors because I exposed their war on truth. I went to court and won, but as a response to my victory, they launched a barrage of lawfare suits on taxpayers money, and even though I won most, they forced me to pay endless legal fees in a battle of attrition.
This is only a small fraction of the criminal and despicable behaviour of the clique running Ghent University. This is the scum that is now kicking @nathancofnas out because he did what EVERY scientist should have done: expose lies and spread truth.
🚨🇦🇺NEWS: Melbourne Airport has been slammed after it was revealed it has Unisex Toilets but Gender Segregated Islamic Prayer Rooms
So the only women who get any privacy are Muslims
Angela Rayner and her department have some serious questions to answer.
It has been revealed through FOI requests submitted by Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy that the Communities Department deleted all responses submitted to the Working Group tasked by Rayner with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.
Nick has accused the department of a “cover-up” and wants to establish whether extremist groups influenced the process.
Since its publication, the definition has been used to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam. It has revived Britain’s blasphemy laws for Islam alone.
Public, private and charitable bodies have been encouraged to adopt the new non-statutory definition — with some, such as South Wales Police, going even further.
The Free Speech Union exposed at the start of the year that all five members of the Working Group had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND — both of which successive governments have adopted a policy of non-engagement with since 2009 due to concerns about extremism.
Nick Timothy has said: “Labour must come clean on whether extremist groups helped to draft their ‘Islamophobia’ definition.
“Ministers have refused to answer whether these groups influenced the definition despite a no-contact policy, and we now know that the Government deleted every single response that the working group received.
“This is clearly a cover-up under way, and the public have a right to know whether a definition the Government is asking the entire public and private sector to adopt was influenced by the views of extremists.”
This is a truly astonishing admission. The Government introduced what amounts to a de facto Islamic blasphemy law in Britain, it could have been influenced by Islamist extremists, and it then deleted all the evidence submitted to the Working Group.
Questions must be answered.
Read more below 👇