The Massacre of Verdun has been romanticized by pagan hippies since after WW1 but the truth is it wasn't ultimately about religion. It was about tribes who refused to unify, or what we would call anti-state terrorism today. It was political and military reprisal after Widukind butchered Frankish forces and killed nobles, counts, and envoys in cold blood.
Charlemagne marched north and the Saxons handed over the terrorists. They ordered 4,500 of them to be beheaded. Historians call it "Legal vengeance" and it was directly tied to Oath Breaking (something these modern pagans bellow about which shows their historical hypocrisy).
Windukind's men were traitors and cowards who broke their oaths. Windukind himself fled and chose conversion rather than die with his men. So why do these hippie pagans try to romanticize him? Because the only thing they can hold on to is pseudo history.
Himmler (and some of his mid level clerks) essentially dug up romanticized pseudo-history from interwar period writers, because he had a pattern of falling back on pseudo-history as a very poor historian himself, and many actual German scholars destroyed him over it.
Hitler himself sided with Charlemagne.
Other than that there aren't many examples of forced conversion in mainland Europe. Some of the Nordic holdouts like Iceland and Norway used the same harsh tactics they had used before Christianity to enforce the law after their conversions. Before Christianity there was raiding, blood feuds, human sacrifice, and Vikings attacked peaceful Christians. So this is just selective Cherry picking at best.
The Anglo Saxons and Franks conversions were all driven by elites and happened hundreds of years earlier. These are the men that created Europe.
These accounts and these types of social media grifters are doing exactly what former slaves in America do with history: They romanticize and cherry pick fake accounts and make up nonsense to elevate a culture that isn't particularly impressive. Pagans have a left wing colonized mindset, and this just creates division among Whites at a time when our actual history is under attack.
This is a preview. I have about 10 hours of color footage with no watermark(can make edits or w.e.). I said a few months back i would change the far-right propaganda game. I'm going to have all of it upscaled soon. I have almost 700 older banger edits already upscaled. I have friends making new ones. Just wanted to let you know I'm not only going to deliver, I'm going to over deliver. As usual. πͺβ‘οΈ WFP
Nothing can stop what is coming!
Archive below
@RannoSlav IA Canaanite punics from Israel & Tunisia published in 2025 have a novel 40~% W-Euro R1b influx alongside 45~% NW-Euro-like DNA on qpAdm, relative to earlier BA Canaanites.
The only people mixing with them during this time were Israelites.
@TribesRedeemed She's talking about Enoch son of Jared, not Enoch son of Cain.
The correct response is that Christ is not a new entity, but rather God incarnate. He is the very God whose call Abraham heeded, who took Enoch and Elijah, and whose promise of their redemption Israel trusted in.
@gorillademocrat@q1932138912435 The Christian Identity narrative of pre-history can have substantial genetic support, not to mention all other disciplines. Open your mind:
https://t.co/hC6mVm9kTi
https://t.co/KLzPIHUWyJ
https://t.co/gGA7r1tQMw
https://t.co/8ySVuAcyLu
LOL what a clown ... the Law is spiritual, Romans 7:14, and it was only given to Israel. The law forbid Abraham from substituting for his own seed, "but the children of the promise are counted for the seed" (Romans 9:8) and there is no such things as spiritual sperm (seed = ΟΟΞΟΞΌΞ±).
Abraham was the forefather of the Romans (Romans 4:1) but Abraham, born circa 1950 BC, had already become the father of many nations, as Paul wrote that epistle circa 57 AD. Abraham is the father of many nations "As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were" because those nations did not yet exist when Abraham received that promise (Romans 4:17).
The Romans descended from the ancient Israelites, and many of Israel had been scattered even before the Exodus. So stop lying to people. Paul only went to the nations of the twelve tribes (Acts 26:6-7).
@richtidwell@TribesRedeemed Biblical redemption is a kin-based act. Only kin can redeem someone (Lev 25:47-49). A non-kin purchasing someone is acquiring new property, not redemption. So because Christβs purchase is explicitly framed as redemption, the people in Revelation 5:9 can only be Israel, his kin.
@CsfHighlan97034@AlbertusMvagnus@Dfire8801 Whether a model fits the data is different to whether it fits the genuine historical reality as established by prior disciplines (Archaeology, Linguistics, ancient texts, etc.). His model does the former, but not the latter.
@CsfHighlan97034@AlbertusMvagnus@Dfire8801 And in this case, both modelling combinations are equally plausible explanations of the target's data within their idiosyncratically defined allele frequency space.
@MattKerr830511@AdultWhiteFemal Gayness, and a reprobate mind in general, is a punishment from God for suppressing the truth of his existence and power in one's own unrighteousness, see Romans 1:18 onwards.
A good buddy of mine has finally released a real Christian Identity DNA testing kit.
Want to prove that you are a REAL JEW?
Do you want to find out if YOU have a soul?
Do you want your DNA sequenced without giving it to Jews (Edomites) and Mormons?
Want proof that you did NOT come from Africa?
"So, send your DNA to The Real Jewsβ’ for a change, and learn the TRUTH about who you really are"
Click the link to purchase a kit and prove that you is da real jews and that we was kangz of Israel.
Use code: LACG for a 10% discount
ππ»ππ»ππ»ππ»
https://t.co/3t7W9MP9eh