Yarper

None ya

[Pierre Poilievre @PierrePoilievre]

A big congratulations to the Alto executives for getting $2.8 million in bonuses for a train project that has no route, no financing, no building permit, no start date, and won’t exist for over a decade.

The Liberal Club is getting richer than ever. Thank you, Mark Carney. Pop the Champagne!!! 🍾 🥂

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

A census worker in Alberta was caught on camera pressuring a citizen to complete the 2026 census, stating, “Alright, well you do realize it’s a legal requirement and you will be required to complete it one way or another.”

Lawyers funded by the Justice Centre have launched a legal challenge against the 2026 long-form census, arguing that compelling Canadians to disclose highly personal information — including information about health, daily activities, commuting habits, housing circumstances, sexual orientation, and gender identity — is unreasonable.
https://t.co/P0fltkuaEd

[Nathan Cooke @CelticAshes]

Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN) reported that violent encounters between security guards and Indigenous people have become an increasingly common occurrence in Winnipeg.

What do you notice about the security guards, whose job is supposed to be to observe and report, not physically assault citizens?

If I recall correctly, many of these same First Nations groups previously advocated for open border policies and used slogans such as “No one is illegal on stolen land” at their protests.

Now, they are dealing with some of the consequences of the very policies and ideas they once supported.

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

🚨 The silent flood: Canada's hidden immigration crisis

While Canadians obsess over the heavily scrutinized Temporary Foreign Worker Program, the real elephant in the room quietly flooding the country with nearly a million temporary workers every year remains completely under the radar.

The International Mobility Program (IMP) is the Liberals' favourite backdoor for mass, unmitigated migration. It’s a largely underreported program that is wreaking absolute havoc on Canadian housing, health care, wages, and the future for young Canadians.

It comes in stark contrast to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) that dominates in headlines, which requires a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) for entry.

Employers have to prove they can't find Canadians first, through the assessment process. It’s well documented that this is not a foolproof process and that program is riddled with fraud, exploitation and abuse, but the IMP? It doesn’t even need a LMIA!

Instead, the IMP is mostly wide open to anyone under international agreements, intra-company transfers, post-grad work permits, spousal open permits, and dozens of exemptions.

Non-permanent residents with employment income are broken down into a few different categories under the umbrella of foreign workers with work permits, including the TFWP, the IMB for work purposes, IMB for study purposes, IMB for other purposes, study permit holders without a work permit and “other” temporary residents without a work permit.

In the 2025 Report to Parliament on Immigration, Minister Lena Diab approved the message that this is “based on the broader economic, cultural, or other competitive advantages for Canada and reciprocal benefits enjoyed by Canadians and permanent residents.”

Yet the surge has been entirely unprecedented.

The report notes that “in 2024, there were 191,630 individuals with new work permits under the TFWP” verses a staggering “717,405 individuals with new work permits under the IMP.” That’s more than half a million more people than the TFWP; almost four-times as many!

The largest source country for this is influx is India, followed by Ukraine.

Year after year, the IMP dwarfs the TFWP, with the disparity growing a staggering amount since at least 2010; numbers that exploded under the Liberal government in 2015.

This isn't the controlled, sustainable immigration that Canada historically knew – it’s floodgates wide open.

Open work permits (i.e. no LMIA) mean these workers can go anywhere, to any job, because there’s nothing tying them to a specific employer or proven labour shortage. The results of this flood is predictable chaos.

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem called for policy changes in October 2025 to address a lowering standard of living, explaining that productivity growth has been weak, and without structural improvements (which monetary policy cannot directly fix), incomes will end up lower than they otherwise could have been.

Canada's temporary resident population ballooned to millions, driving the housing crisis into overdrive, making rent skyrocket, leaving young families priced out and youth not getting entry level jobs.

Hospitals are overwhelmed, schools are strained, and federal policy implications from this are being continually downloaded onto provinces and municipalities without adequate resources to absorb the culture shock.

Youth unemployment climbs as employers flood the market with cheaper temporary labour.

Public polling shows most Canadians now see temporary foreign worker programs – and by extension this unchecked IMP surge – as hammering housing affordability and job prospects for Canadian kids.

Yet the Liberals kept the taps on full blast for years, prioritizing 'broader economic benefits' over Canadian workers and communities.

This is the same government that lectured us about 'building back better' while importing the scale of a small city every few months without building the infrastructure to match.

It's reckless, unsustainable, and it’s hitting everyday Canadians the hardest, especially in our biggest cities and provinces like Ontario that are disproportionately expected to absorb this influx.

While the TFWP gets most of the blame and the press, the IMP is the silent predator. It’s bigger, faster, and far less accountable.

The Liberals opened these floodgates, and now we're all paying the price with a generation of young Canadians shut out of the housing and job markets their parents took for granted.

Elbows up, Canada.

[Yarper @Yarper78]

Ridiculous https://t.co/9j6mVmxJVs

[Bradshaw @myabradshaw78]

Carney’s “Useful Voters” what were you promised?? Carney knew you were idiots and were easy to manipulate. Carney thinks less of you than your own constituents you betrayed. You are a proven joke. Now have the day you deserve…

[C3 @C_3C_3]

The increase in the term “White Supremacy” used by the Media…

From 2010-2020:

LA Times: 9749%
New York Times: 2969%
Washington Post: 6778%
Wall Street Journal: 1691%

None of it was organic.

White Supremacy was a Leftist creation.

All manufactured to push anti-white racism.

[T.D. Leaker @TdLeaker]

The WEF has selected the new Prime Minister of UK and will be installing them shortly.

[Northern Perspective @NorthrnPrspectv]

🚨 WE DID IT 🚨

We investigated the Longest Ballot operation. Our viewers sent tens of thousands of emails and complaints.

That pressure helped trigger a parliamentary inquiry, testimony, recommendations, and now changes to Canadian election law.

Live tonight at 9PM ET.

[Rebel News Canada @RebelNews_CA]

Newly obtained Canada Revenue Agency records show temporary residents received more than $1.35 billion in Canada Child Benefit (CCB) payments between 2020 and 2023, including $369.1 million in 2023 alone.

Full details: https://t.co/cks4X52CC8

[Kelsi Sheren @Kelsisheren]

No no NO THANKS

[Mark Reid 🇨🇦 @MarkReid42]

So it came out that Corney and company are going to bail out the condo kings.

Ask yourself why?

I present to you this fucking clip from Bookfield's own website.

NOTE the part: Opportunistic real estate

[Dwight Singh Schrute @DwightSinghS]

After destroying the lakes in India, Hindus are now hellbent on destroying Canadian waters.

How low does your IQ have to be to do this?

[🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets @AntonioTweets2]

Toronto Police officer Farhan Ali has been charged following a Peel Regional Police Special Victims Unit investigation. He is facing multiple charges, including three counts of sexual assault, three counts of assault, and four counts of mischief. Police have released limited details, and the case is now before the courts. Toronto Police confirm he has been suspended with pay, and the alleged incidents occurred while off duty. At the same time, the “officervik” account — known for a strong online presence and appearing in photos with Ali — now appears to be gone. Coincidence or something more? These allegations have not been proven in court.

Elbows up 🥴

[Great Canadian Moose @Great_Cdn_Moose]

One Down, Two to Go!

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

‼️NEW -- WHAT?!?

Ottawa Police chief admits that his members are "using police databases to meet women" including "vulnerable victims"

"seeing a woman coming out of a gym, driving next to them, and running their license plate"

[Canada Proud @WeAreCanProud]

#BREAKING: In yet another hot mic incident, Mark Carney is caught insulting HIS OWN MPs, telling the visiting Croatian prime minister Andrej Plenkovic that they're just "useful for votes."

He then makes another comment about his cabinet ministers, but the comments from the Croatian prime minister he was responding to is inaudible, so the context is difficult to make out.

Regardless, it shows yet more contempt that Carney has for Canada's representative democracy. He'd like to have all the power in his own hands.

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.

The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.

Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.

But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.

The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.

Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.

That is now on full display.

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.

The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.

The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.

Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.

For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.

Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.

This is why Carney needed those extra seats.

The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.

The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.

It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.

This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.

Canadians deserve better.

The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

[Canada Proud @WeAreCanProud]

Does this feel accurate to you? 😂