@jonJ_ilobela@senatePH Presiding judge Chiz Escudero, i believe that that is not a generational divide but a pure arrogance and incompetence of the defense counsel!
“What may be relevant, your honor. WHAT MAY BE RE-LE-VANT. This is beyond relevant, your honor”
A visibly upset & highly frustrated Atty Kapunan calling out the defense counsel’s crafting a premise that assumes unverified facts to snare the witness into a faulty admission.
Tama naman talaga si Atty Ligutan.
He didn’t name anyone.
Guilty party madam defense counsel?
Or are you just MISLEADING the public with this “paawa” statement? Sorry, but we ARE NOT NAIVE also. Hindi kami madadala sa mga “pa-victim” tactic ninyo!
Ignorance of the law excuses no one.
Revised Rules on Evidence, Rule 132 Sec. 10:
A misleading question is one which assumes as true a fact not yet testified to by the witness, or contrary to that which he has previously stated.
It is not allowed.
@iamJulianMiguel Ms. SHeila, you should have taught your defense team better instead of pointing finger and blaming the prosecution on your weaknesses! Really disgusting faces and manners!
Kahit daw may questions si Atty Kapunan di daw nya kinukwestyon kaya allowed syang mag tanong ng MISLEADING QUESTIONs ?
NAKAKAHAWA TALAGA SI ROBIN 😭😭😭😭
@jesusfalcis Itong Atty. Sison was trying to defend Ferrer and preaching about kindness, respect and humility but her demeanor says otherwise! Teach yourself and your staff what you preach first..sabi nga ni Sen. Tulfo tumingin muna sa salamin!