@Yinkster@TheoMediaAI Cool! π
If you like what you see with Tim, I'm sure you'll be very interested in what .@IMikeRussell is doing too.
Worth checking out for sure π
@TheoMediaAI@Yinkster You're very welcome. You've now become essential viewing for me once every couple of weeks.
I love your work: great variety, well researched and accessible information (with just the right amount of humour) ππ
Really glad I found your channel π
@Yinkster By the way: if you're not following .@TheoMediaAI on YouTube, I 100% recommend.
Discovered him a couple of weeks ago, and he's the best I've found so far for really good (and sharp, intelligent) AI roundups... π
@Yinkster This is *exactly* where I'm saying we're headed
Screen becomes the secondary interface replaced by voice as the primary interaction mode
Re: Google Wave: I love you bro, but you're *so wrong*
Not only was it ahead of its time, practically all its features are now mainstream
@Yinkster True, but there's no pressure to innovate. We're at peak screen UI, I feel
Rabbit and the AI pin are the first exploratory steps in search of a new interface. I think it's voice + AI, ultimately.
And yes, it is possible to be too early (remember Google Wave and Google Glass...)
@Yinkster Suddenly, screens (and the devices they are attached to) will become secondary input sources/devices
Why type or even write when you can just ask and receive? (Think about how that will affect the wearables market like headsets/glasses)
Thanks for attending my TED Talk...π
@Yinkster A potential 'everyone killer' is AI.
Think about it: accurate information (once hallucination kinks are worked out), provided just as fast (or faster) than human thought, in a medium that everyone instinctively uses: natural language...
@Yinkster Good question.
Rights licensing is much further down the budget long tail, so I'm guessing it'll be relatively cheaper... (Unless they're looking at an exclusive agreement - but even then it shouldn't be anywhere near the cost of original programming...) π€