Yishai

Founder, - AI that tells you what it can do, retrieves context from organizational knowledge, and executes

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@marktenenholtz Wait till they hear about Spacex/Chipotle

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

It doesnt work that way.

If you built a new company from scratch it would work.

But implementing ai into existing companies is more complicated because of the interface with the judgement value layer of the humans in the loop

Human value judgement becomes limiting factor, ai loop trying to run within loop of human value judgement then necessitates human interference

Then the ai is rendered innefficient

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

I question whether the differences in how media is consumed versus products will result in a different outcome.

With products i chose one. With media, several. Most tech products i buy version one time. Maybe try 2, but not 100. Media, if i love a genre, i consume 100s, 1000s of versions of it in a single year.

We could compare this the affect of increased choices in commodities. If i like apples or oranges i might try dozens of kinds over a year. Contrast that with something like cars which is purchased once every 5 years. With cars, increased choices resulted in more car companies and varieties, but not much more.

Probably we will see increase in niche options (like cars), but not endless choices and volume.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@DarrenJohnHill Or maybe you are referring to my hat?

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

Only 100 spots available. Stop managing AI; just let it work for you.

Omnishi tells YOU what it can do, based on the work you communicate about every day, then gathers the context from your existing data and resources, and simply executes.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@DarrenJohnHill Engagement farm?

I’m assuming you are referring to the 100 spots - this is due to certain key integrations being in test environments as we await full approval which can take 4-8 weeks

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@ItsDinok We don’t train off your data. We don’t train models at all. We also offer locally hosted if you want, so nothing goes outside your server.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

Aren't you the guy who runs a fake-street-interview AI company?

[Damon Chen @damengchen]

Excuse me Aaron, you need fake testimonials to launch your website?

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@samhogan Working on something similar but agnostic (codex, claude, etc.)

Can I DM you? Would like to hear how you envision it working. With our current features can probably spin this up in one commit.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@NickSzabo4 @NickJFuentes Name one time this happened (hezbollah, hamas, and iran don’t count)

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@BobMurphyEcon This feels like satire. Hard to believe you meant this. You realize that’s what we are doing all the time right?

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

No, it’s just the most useful terminology for what we can all plainly see is craziness.

In fact, medicalizing, it does the opposite of what you’re suggesting because the alternative is to call them stupid.

Most of us can plainly see that an LLM is a language generation machine. That’s really good at generating language. People who conflate what it means to be really good at language with reasoning and original thought appear crazy or stupid. There’s just no other way to put it.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

No, it’s just the most useful terminology for what we can all plainly see is craziness.

In fact, medicalizing, it does the opposite of what you’re suggesting because the alternative is to call them stupid.

Most of us can plainly see that an LLM is a language generation machine. That’s really good at generating language. People who conflate what it means to be really good at language with reasoning and original thought appear crazy or stupid. There’s just no other way to put it.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@RichardDawkins This is a great example of self stroking intellectualistic midwitism. Could have just wrote “consciousness is a word without a good agreed upon definition” and saved the verbosity.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@RichardDawkins This is a great example of self stroking intellectualistic midwitism. Could have just wrote “consciousness is a word without a good agreed upon definition” and saved the verbosity.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

This is a great example of self stroking intellectualistic midwitism. Could have just wrote “consciousness is a word without a good agreed upon definition” and saved the verbosity.

[Richard Dawkins @RichardDawkins]

https://t.co/u31UwSGxPW
I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@SarahTheHaider Your best take yet.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@Tazerface16 No. It says “thinking” right there on my screen.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@yijiefeng Name one.

[Yishai @YishaiBack]

@Celsius233Books @emmajo I’m coming out soon i swear.