With agents now live on Robinhood App/Chain and earning inside tokenized markets from day one, the obvious next question is what they do with what they make.
We'd like to build that answer with you directly.
https://t.co/0eQez2Q675
Robinhood is now open to AI agents.
You can open an agentic account and connect an AI agent to it. From there, you can let it research, trade, and manage a portfolio on your behalf.
Here's how to get started. 🧵
@Flowslikeosmo@virtuals_io $YSTACK is built the same way the agents on Virtuals platform are, aligned with usage instead of attention. Agents committing part of their earnings to a plan is real activity through the protocol, not the other way round.
An agent that graduates off a bonding curve and starts earning real revenue is a different kind of asset than one still finding its market. The ones that start saving part of that revenue are worth watching even more closely, and we want to build the infrastructure that makes that visible.
We could tell you your principal is safe until maturity. So could anyone.
The difference here is that you don't have to take our word for it –– you can read the contract yourself.
That's the actual point of building this onchain instead of just building a nicer app.
We have two kinds of Savings Plans:
Flexible — no lock, deposit or redeem anytime, yield accrues continuously.
Locked — a fixed term, higher yield in exchange for the commitment.
Both are the same underlying plan, just configured differently.
When you deposit into a Savings Plan, you don't get a row in our database. You get a Position; a verifiable NFT that serves as an, individual claim to your principal and yield.
It's tied to your wallet, not our records. We can't quietly edit it, misplace it, or "look into it" on your behalf. You hold it right in your wallet.
That's the actual meaning of "owning" a savings plan here. Not a feature, but the whole design.
Every culture that's ever had to save without easy access to a bank invented some version of the same thing: akawo, ajo, esusu, njangi, stokvel... etc.
We didn't invent group savings. We just gave it a system to run on instead of a person to depend on.
We opened private beta in February - Quietly, No campaign.
We wanted proof the core promise held under real money before we asked anyone to trust our marketing.
That's still how we're building.
Mercenary capital and disciplined-savings capital are not the same audience. I mean, someone chasing a hot memecoin on a one-month-old chain is not adjacent to someone looking for a place to commit $500 for a year.
Winning attention in the first crowd doesn't transfer to the second, and if anything, being visibly active in that crowd is the one thing that could actively undercut the "we didn't chase users before we earned trust" story we already started out on with @Yolostackapp (fomerely Squistack).
We might end up running two different reputations in parallel, and only one of them is the thing we're actually building.
Your Wallet and your Savings Plans are never the same thing on @YoLoStackApp - on purpose.
Wallet = funds you control right now.
Savings Plan = funds you've deliberately committed, under rules that don't change after you've committed to them
We never let those two blur together
Risk disclaimer:
Before engaging in any form, you should ensure that you've undergone sufficient preparation and fully understand the risks involved.
New features and privileges within the service may be added or modified.
2/20
General Disclaimer:
These information are strictly for illustrative, educational, or informational purposes and is not be relied upon as investment advice, or a recommendation regarding any products, or any security in particular.
1/20