I've been trying to build a side project using a minimal keyword row approach to describe my tech interests, but I'm skeptical about how effective this will be in conveying my expertise as a full-stack web dev, especially when compared to the more detailed title stacks like "Seni
Just commenting to agree with you. We've built agentic video editing software called ReScript, which does pretty much what you laid out. It has a first-class abstract model of a timeline, transcriptions, diarization, gap analysis, in-span editing, visual systems, incremental distributed rendering, sound design and loudness monitoring review, etc., etc. But I have to say, Opus 5.5 has really made me update my priors about the need for a harness. We started building short videos with it end-to-end and I was so impressed. We got more ambitious and started building 15- to 20-minute videos. Generally you can just prompt it to do incremental rendering and review and it will just work. So now we're using a combination of an agentic harness for the macro editing and being far more ambitious with end-to-end rendering of sections smaller than 15 minutes or so. But things are moving so fast. I honestly couldn't tell you for sure whether harnesses will even be required in a couple of years' time. For us it's business-critical that we have full revision control, provenance and observability. We treat the editing process in a similar way to how we would treat software engineering but for low-stakes use cases it's getting to the point where it doesn't even matter.
BREAKING - π΅π°πΉπΌπ¨π³ Pakistan has closed its airspace to commercial carriers from Taiwan under Chinaβs One-China policy, Bloomberg reported