The mission of Sustainable Growth Yolo is to make the region an affordable place to live, work, and raise a family; through access to quality housing and jobs
This week in Davis land use:
A weak 3rd draft of the housing element will be presented.
CalTrans proposed adding lanes to I-80 to accommodate commuters than cant afford Davis housing.
Experiences like the below dehumanizing comments is why we founded Sustainable Growth Yolo.
It was a truly awful experience to watch and the council did end up killing the proposed mixed use apartment complex directly across the street from UC Davis.
@marcelemoran Its wild that Davis is still debating on whether it should keep car parking minimums. Literally the most bike friendly place in the country and they cant make an easy decision to discourage car use.
Davis is the most bike-friendly city in the country. Yet the City Council is still debating if they should have parking minimums. This should be a No-Brainer. Eliminate parking minimums citywide, Davis.
Meeting update linked on URL
https://t.co/YGyVY3nDLT
Davis's Measure J made prereferral land use planning nearly impossible. Proposals cant coordinate, city cant have a vision & 6 of 7 votes since 2000 failed or no housing was built
Linked is a must-read proposal to amend J for sustainable growth in Davis. https://t.co/sL54tiy3BF
We need to review the latest Davis Housing Element linked here. 1st two were rightfully rejected by HCD
Davis is the wealthiest and highest opportunity city in the Sac region and regularly refuses to build homes for its community members.
https://t.co/UpLBtW1sfw
City of Davis needs to make far more meaningful reforms to their housing approval process than just rezoning a few more properties to get their housing element approved.
“ City Looks to Rezone in Effort to Get Version 3 Housing Element Approved”
https://t.co/AYezjYdVyp
Whistleblower complaint at Caltrans saying the widening of I-80 on the causeway is from road maintenance funds and not freeway expansion funds. and will be used as a pre-tax to expand more lanes.
https://t.co/xpi1lPhuKk
City of Davis continues to fail in putting together a meaningful Housing Element.
The latest rejected version included two large sites, U Mall and Nishi that have no evidence of ever producing housing that HCD called out previously.
https://t.co/4SCUSdFEr4
BREAKING: @GavinNewsom signs @BuffyWicks’ AB1307, which responds to a court ruling blocking UC Berkeley housing for students & formerly homeless people. The bill confirms that people cannot be considered pollution under CEQA.
UC Davis built far more housing than @CityofDavis in the last half decade. They are meeting the goals of their MOU to build housing. While Davis still has a rejected housing element 2 years after the deadline has passed
The current trending post on r/Berkeley is "How to survive as a female, homeless student at UC Berkeley?"
This is not okay. Something has gone horribly wrong in the Bay Area.
(Also please extend grace to these students and help them whenever you can)
Should we worry about affecting the “elegance” of San Francisco just because we’re in a “perceived” housing emergency that “really isn’t an emergency”? If you listen the Board of Appeals, the answer is no.
What core values do we reflect when we continue to deny our problems?
A bunch of new supply coming online (we are hitting multi-decade highs in multifamily production). Annual rent growth in Sac has fallen for 7 consecutive quarters and is now negative at -2%
CEQA was enacted in the 1970s to protect environmental resources.
In 2023, it’s being applied to … [checks notes] … a liquor license transfer from one grocery store to another.
Save this photo next time someone asks why CEQA reform is so urgently needed.
Moving away from project by project approvals to a well planned approach for dense peripheral growth is a way to make Davis a far more sustainable city, and provide housing for everyone who lives, works, and studies in Davis argues Tim Keller https://t.co/vldicoYkW5