Question Everything!

𝙻𝚒𝚏𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚙𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚋𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚔 𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝.

[WikiLeaks @WikiQLeaks]

My God, they really lied about absolutely everything…

[Question Everything! @YouAreTrulyFree]

@gerrydavis123 @nzpoliticsgroup Parental controls already exist at the device-level. In other words parents can already turn the shit off without govt intervention

[Question Everything! @YouAreTrulyFree]

@NickLittleNZ @NZNationalParty In good conscience I can’t give these assholes any votes

[Joshua Riley 🇳🇿 @VoteSovereign]

@NZNationalParty Erica Stanford: We need an online regulator "to be in line with Australia". No one other than B416 begged you for this. That is not democracy.
https://t.co/lWtwehesGJ

[Mr. Pool @MrPool_QQ]

🔻 IT'S OFFICIAL!!!

PFIZER HAS JUST PUBLISHED THE LIST OF POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS,
OF ITS « COVID VACCINE » !!!

IT'S CRIMINAL!

1) Blood clot,
2) Acute kidney injury,
3) Acute flaccid myelitis,
4) Positive anti-sperm antibodies,
5) Brainstem embolism,
6) Brainstem thrombosis,
7) Cardiac arrest (hundreds of cases),
Heart failure,

* 9) Cardiac ventricular thrombosis...

10) Cardiogenic shock,
11) Central nervous system vasculitis,
12) Neonatal death,
13) Deep vein thrombosis,
14) Brainstem encephalitis,
15) Hemorrhagic encephalitis,
16) Frontal lobe epilepsy,
17) Epileptic psychosis,
18) Facial paralysis,
19) Fetal distress syndrome,
20) Gastrointestinal amyloidosis,
21) Generalized tonic-clonic seizure,
22) Hashimoto's encephalopathy,
23) Hepatic vascular thrombosis,
24) Shingles reactivation,

25) * Cancer reactivation...

26) Turbo cancers,
27) Immune-mediated hepatitis,
28) Interstitial lung disease,
29) Jugular vein embolism,
30) Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy,
31) Liver damage,
32) Low birth weight,
34) Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,
35) Myocarditis,
36) Neonatal seizure,
37) Pancreatitis,
38) Pneumonia,
39) Stillbirth,
40) Tachycardia,
41) Temporal lobe epilepsy,
43) Testicular autoimmunity,
44) Thrombotic stroke,
45) Type 1 diabetes mellitus,
46) Neonatal vein thrombosis,
47) Vertebral artery thrombosis,
48) Pericarditis,
49) Sudden infant death syndrome.

SEVERE CONSEQUENCES of a so-called vaccine that protects neither against the disease, nor its transmission, nor severe forms!

" I was insulted, called a dangerous conspiracy theorist, I lost friends for saying that, for any medication, there are side effects, for loudly proclaiming that a so-called vaccine, which kills more than the disease, has no reason to be used, nor made mandatory.

I lost my job as a surgeon because of it! "

Share this before it disappears.

⟁

[Gaye Ess @gaye_ess]

What we are proposing has never been possible. NZ First have never had approx 50 candidates standing in electorates before. Do you think they did that knowing they wouldn't win, but just thought it would look good? FFS No! They did it to win those electorates. They want to win honestly, democratically and ethically. That's who they are. They are against the Brash strategy.
This will probably be Winston's last rodeo. He has worked his whole life for this country. This is our last shot to give him the chance to be PM of the country he loves. I want to help him. That's why I'm voting 2 ticks NZ First.

[NZ MAGA Mike #MAGAmikesMEMEmarathon @NZMAGAMike]

Behind these sits a formidable enforcement apparatus — penalties of up to the greater of NZ$40 million or 10% of global turnover, and, as a last resort, orders that would conscript internet providers and app stores into blocking a platform from New Zealand altogether.

The Bill has not yet had its First Reading. It may yet fall at that fence.

Everybody gets checked
The Bill’s appeal rests on the claim that it targets under-16s. Its mechanism does not. 
To keep one 15-year-old from holding an account, a platform must satisfy itself about the age of every account-holder — which means age-assuring the entire adult population as well. As the Privacy Commissioner Michael Webster put it, keeping under-16s out means everyone over 16 has to prove they are over 16.
That is not a drafting quibble. It is the whole problem, and the Bill never resolves it.
Restricting access to a primary medium of modern communication is a prima facie limit on expression — yet the policy engages neither the section 14 right to freedom of expression in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, which includes the right to receive information, nor the section 5 requirement that any limit be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

What being checked looks like
Clause 11 forbids the cheap check — a manual date of birth entry will not do. So platforms are pushed toward document verification, facial age-estimation, or inference from your device and behaviour. Each fails in its own way, and none of them is confined to children.

Document verification turns every covered service into a honeypot of passports and driver licences. In 2025 Discord exposed roughly 70,000 users’ government IDs through a compromised vendor, and the Tea app leaked tens of thousands of verification selfies and IDs. A leaked password can be reset. A leaked passport cannot.

Facial estimation is spoofable — Australian teenagers reportedly defeated the cameras with a drawn-on moustache — and genuinely inaccurate in the 13 to 17 band that actually matters. 
Inference is behavioural profiling, a surveillance technique the Bill elsewhere lists as a risk and here repurposes as a safety tool.
Whichever route is chosen, the endpoint is the same: a durable, centralised link between a real human identity and online activity, checked continuously, for everyone, on every covered service. Destroying the data after each check does nothing about that.

And does it even work?
Australia switched its under-16 ban on in December 2025. Its own three-month evaluation found 81.5% of under-16s still using an age-restricted platform — down barely four points from 85.9%. The Government’s response was to double the maximum fine. 

In Britain, VPN sign-ups surged more than 1,400% within minutes of the equivalent duties taking effect, returning users to exactly the unverified internet the law tried to wall off. 
A law its targets can defeat with a felt-tip pen is not regulation. 

It is theatre — and that evidence was available before New Zealand chose to proceed. The wrong regulator This is my sharpest objection, and the Government has presented it as an unremarkable administrative detail.

The regulator is to be the Secretary of Internal Affairs — the chief executive of the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA), which is anything but a neutral, single-purpose body.
It already runs the Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, which blocks websites at internet-provider level. It houses the Censorship Compliance Unit and its warranted inspectors. And it holds the country’s core identity infrastructure — passports, citizenship records, and the Digital Identity Services Trust Framework. This Bill would layer onto that same department a new power over age verification and access to social media. Identity verification, content classification, internet filtering and investigative enforcement, concentrated in a single agency.

[John Galt @dadiani_george]

Absolutely f*cking brilliant.

Seriously. Watch this.

So spot on, exactly what happened to most of us in the last 6 years. And somehow she manages to lay it all out in such a way that makes you laugh. Because, you just have to laugh. You have to laugh as it’s all so f*cking absurd.

How Covid woke us all up.

Covid didn’t just interrupt life. It cracked the floor. An epistemic rupture.

Then you caught sight of that little white rabbit, and if you followed that little f*cker far enough, you came out the other side of Wonderland, and landed square on your grazed arse (British for ass) in reality. Except it’s not what you thought it was - at all. Nothing is.

@shipwreckshow

[🎯 The Coincidence 🎯- Dissdisinfo @dissdisinfo]

The NATIONAL (@NZNationalParty ) betrayal: National-Labour Grand Coalition

We've learned in recent months that National is quite happy to ignore Coalition partners and pass woke, commie, or fascist agenda legislation alongside their historical rivals.

National is no longer conservative, no longer even on the Right.

It's time that traditional National voters jumped the sinking ship. Penk was the last hope. Now all hope is gone.

Vote for NZ's future, not commie fascist, interfering @NZNationalParty

[Gaye Ess @gaye_ess]

Here's something to consider.....
My electorate is Coromandel. It is a National safe seat. Has been for years. Scott Simpson, the invisible MP who we never hear from.
So the Brash strategy is for me to vote for him. He gets in again. Same old same old. And National gets a whole lot of MPs that their electorates didn't really want.
Vincent Anderson, my local NZ First candidate, is a first time politician. A great young man, so keen and passionate about his party. So if I give him my vote, which I will, how do we know what will happen? Look at the rise in the party's support this year. Thousands are now voting NZ First who didn't last time, especially ex-Nat voters.
They have to live somewhere. What if hundreds of them live in my or your electorate? What if we have a complete turnaround this time? I'll tell you one thing.... we will never know if everyone votes for National!
Why not give it a go and see how big this party is that the MSM and so many other want to keep small!
And please give Vincent a follow! @VA_NZ_First
Vote 2 ticks NZ First!

[Kiwi Truth Seeker @timeforchangenz]

Remember there is NO left or Right anymore. Just ONE Big Globalist uniparty in parliament at present.
Que the Green party trying to PANIC you into voting NATIONAL.
The only way to defeat the UNIParty is to Not GIFT NATS any seats.
Party AND Candidate Vote NZFIRST ✅️✅️

[Tim Wikiriwhi @TWikiriwhi]

100%!
Did you learn anything from suffering the Globalist tyranny of Ardern?
Luxon is doing the very same thing.
Will you sheepishly comply... selling out our National independence and Freedom?
Or will you make a stand *Now*... ???
Failure to stop Digital tyranny will be the greatest mistake of your life.... Your kids future *depends* of us saving our Rights and Freedom from Globalist Digital enslavement.

[Trevor Hughes @TrevorH53038397]

This is not about "protecting children", every device already contains parental controls which will do that. This is about building the surveillance State so that a woke public servant in Wellington will get to decide what can be shown on the Internet and who can see it. Luxon must go!

[Agent Smith (Mumbo/Jumbo) 🇳🇿 @AgentSmith_NZ]

Hey @NZNationalParty
You might want to check the ratio's on this post. So far:
54,800 views, 76 likes

That's one hell of an unpopular policy, you sure you want to die on that hill?
#nzpol

[Sande Chin The Underinfluencer @SandeChin]

This is actually their true election slogan

[Ramese Sanders @RameseSanders]

It’s crazy how scientists claim they can tell us exactly how dinosaurs died millions of years ago but when a baby dies in their sleep 36 hours after a vaccine it’s suddenly a mystery.

[Trevor Hughes @TrevorH53038397]

https://t.co/PFX58ge7Gc

"It is presented as a narrow, popular measure: keep under-16s off high-risk social media, force platforms to verify age, and require child-safety risk assessments. No one wants children exposed to grooming, relentless cyberbullying, or addictive design. The political packaging is careful. Parents are not penalised. The targets are large technology companies. The language is about protecting the vulnerable.

Yet the underlying change is philosophical. Responsibility for a cultural and parental problem is transferred to platforms and a new state regulator. “Harm” is left sufficiently elastic that it can expand. Risk assessments and compliance duties create ongoing leverage. Once the institutional machinery exists, the definition of safety rarely stays fixed at its original boundary."

[Holyhekatuiteka @2ETEKA]

🚩Labour to support Luxon’s social media ban (digital ID) bill after securing demands which include ‘Te Tiriti’ provisions.

Erica Stanford gloated “oh they must have been moved by Stuffs poll showing 80% of NZ’ers support it!”

We are being governed by bloody crooked stuff polls.

In Australia the campaign for the social media ban was bankrolled to the tune of millions by Newscorp. The ban is mana from heaven for the MSM which has lost huge market share to social media.

In the UK - their internet regulator OFCOM (which National and Labour will bring in here) has made part of the policy for their social media ban due to start next year - that You tubes algorithms are to favour pushing news from the BBC over any independent news outlet.

The effect is chilling, it will be like being in covid mania permanently - information will be controlled by the Govt & MSM.

The greens won’t support the ban.. why? because it doesn’t go far enough … they want to control all of social media and ALL ages -ie bureaucrats will decide what social media adults can view.

Press release from the greens:

“A ban on social media for under-16s doesn’t solve the problem of social media platforms churning out harmful and dangerous content in the first place,” says Green Party Spokesperson for Media and Communications, Hūhana Lyndon.

“We need to regulate social media platforms for all users so these platforms are free from harmful content, rather than just trying to limit access for young people while others continue to engage with harmful algorithms.”

what’s more, they want to use the extreme authoritarian EU proposed social media ban - which has just been ruled illegal for contravening human rights by a supreme court France. This was always where it was going to end up, the masses brainwashed by Trans/te tiriti/ climate change hysteria with no other competing argument .

The Governments last budget earlier this year provisioned $30 million for the digital ID initiation - which is small beer compared to the millions Labour and then National have spent on “ The digital ID trust framework” which builds the architecture between your ID and digital currency.

The India FTA has a clause that states NZ will work with india to design a joint CBDC.

This is all PIGSLOP with a capital P … unfortunately a lot of low information and mainly older voters who can’t even send an email or turn off the caps lock think this is all such a good idea … sigh.

[Adnan Belushi @adnanbelushi]

Luxon is pushing the u-16s social media ban under pressure from his donor Anna Mowbray. This is not something the voters have asked for.

[Simon Anderson @SimonRAnderson]

You know you should have stood up against Ardern's pandemic lockdowns.

To protect your children.

To protect your family.

Now is your chance to redeem yourself. Resist Erica Stanford's digital lockdowns.

For your children.

For your family.

For Liberty.

For our future.