🚨 Big Tech just saved Canadians from their own government.
Here’s what Bill C-22 would have done to your phone. 👇
📌 The Liberal bill would force companies to build technical backdoors into encrypted devices - giving government access without a judge’s approval.
📌 Secret orders. No judicial oversight. No transparency with users. Ministers could compel compliance unilaterally.
📌 User metadata retained for up to one year. Mandatory.
Then Big Tech showed up.
📌 Apple to Parliament: “When you build a backdoor into an encrypted device - anyone can walk through.”
📌 Google: Bill C-22 “goes well beyond lawful access regimes in other G7 democracies.”
📌 Meta: The bill would make WhatsApp and Messenger “an extension of the government’s surveillance apparatus.”
📌 Signal, NordVPN, ExpressVPN, Windscribe, ProtonVPN all threatened to leave Canada entirely if it passed.
📌 Apple pointed to the 2024 Salt Typhoon cyberattack on US systems - which exploited the exact same “lawful access” infrastructure Carney wants to build here.
“That law was narrower than Bill C-22. Imagine what could happen here.”
Think about that. 👆
The Chinese government hacked US systems through a legal backdoor Washington created.
Carney wants to build a bigger one. In Canada.
And he didn’t ask you. 🤐
This isn’t about catching criminals.
If it was - they’d require a judge.
This is a government that funded $1.4B in CBC propaganda, appointed 740 judges, captured 105 senators —
And now wants a backdoor into your phone. 📱
Without a warrant. 👇
Apple and Google did more to protect Canadian civil liberties this month than the Liberal Party has in 10 years.
Let that land. 🇨🇦
🔁 Repost before this gets buried.
🇨🇦 #CdnPoli #BillC22 #Privacy
🚨 Massive news with worldwide repercussions!
The FTC, along with Alaska, Iowa, Nebraska, and Texas, have filed a lawsuit against the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), alleging the organization has provided the means for medical providers to make false and unsubstantiated claims to parents in order to sell pediatric medical transition services.
WPATH, an association of clinicians who profit from pediatric medical transition services, recommended medical interventions, including drugs and surgery, for children and adolescents who expressed dissatisfaction with or distress about their sex traits. In their complaint, the FTC and its state partners allege that these recommendations misled parents and children about the medical consensus and medical necessity, as well as the safety and effectiveness, of such services, in violation of the FTC Act.
"Today, the FTC filed a lawsuit against WPATH alleging that the organization made false and unsubstantiated claims regarding the necessity, effectiveness and safety of puberty blockers, hormones and sex-change surgeries," said Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson.
"Children, but especially their parents, must have complete and truthful information when making decisions to purchase medical services. For decades, the FTC has taken action against entities that make deceptive and unsubstantiated health-related claims. The complaint filed today reflects that same long-standing mandate: when an entity makes a claim about a medical treatment, the claim must be truthful, evidence-based and not misleading."
In 2022, WPATH omitted all mention of age limitations for breast amputation or penis removal from the "Standards of Care" document providing the organization's official recommendations for treating sex-trait-related dissatisfaction or distress in children.
As alleged in the complaint, WPATH did not base this decision on medical evidence.
As described in the complaint, in several instances, parents seeking help for their children were asked by clinicians whether they "would rather have a live daughter or a dead son," based on WPATH representations that pediatric medical transition services are "lifesaving." As the complaint argues, there is no competent and reliable scientific evidence to suggest these interventions reduce the risk of suicide.
WPATH claims its recommendations represent "consensus-based expert opinion." This leads WPATH members and other clinicians to repeat to consumers false, misleading or unsubstantiated statements about safety and efficacy found in WPATH guidelines, according to the complaint.
According to the complaint, despite the absence of competent and reliable scientific evidence, WPATH's guidelines label nearly every pediatric transition service as "medically necessary" to maximize the likelihood that insurers will pay for the pediatric transition procedures.
@RupertLowe10 Keir Starmer should be in prison with the paedophiles.
"While Sir Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions, it has been reported that 13,000 suspected rape gang members and paedophiles were let off with warning letters."