@courtneyhall44@stevecofield@davecokin@holy_sports@BattleBornJW@joeygilbertinc “Lawyers” as in Joey Gilbert, who also happens to be making a bid for Governor in Nevada on what appears to be an anti-mask platform? Personal politics aside, drumming up a legal dispute on a topic such as this is just free publicity and speaks little to the underlying merits.
@courtneyhall44@stevecofield@davecokin@holy_sports@BattleBornJW@joeygilbertinc I put very rarely to avoid speaking in absolutes, as exceptions or circumstances may exist in some cases that alter the licensor/licensee relationship. But as a general rule, a licensee has no personal ownership interest. A class action here on that basis has no merit.
@courtneyhall44@stevecofield@davecokin@holy_sports@BattleBornJW A season ticket holder possesses a license to the specific stadium seat(s), as the term Personal Seat License implies. Very rarely, if ever, does a licensee personally have an ownership interest in the property at issue. The licensor retains the interest and can revoke at will.
@von_josiah@bomland10@Jmillio1000@KasaundraS12@wludford@Bease11 Because when the government asked pharmaceutical companies to expedite their own processes for a vaccine they weren’t sure they’d be able to deliver as promised and wanted assurance they wouldn’t go bankrupt because of something the government essentially forced them into doing