Islam killed more Hindus that Nazism killed Jews.
You will never find any Jew say "Nazism tha hai aur rahega". Never ever.
But the so-called head of Hindus says "Islam tha hai aur rahega".
What does this tell us about Hindu community?
Those brave Hindu women were destined to die anyway. The choice was death by holy fire or death after 1 year of gang-rape in a Muslim harem.
Hindu women chose former as they refused to let their bodies become jihadi-producing machines and demographic tools. They thus saved the Hindu nation.
By denying the rapist what he was seeking, they defeated him. They retained their honor and refused to get humiliated by a rapist. They saved the honor of Hindus.
But what would you know about honor, Swara? I know what you would have chosen.
Historian KS Lal's research concludes that the average life expectancy of a Hindu woman in Muslim harems was 1 year.
A Hindu noble woman was raped by the Sultan, his brothers, then his generals and finally passed over to their homosexual servants. Most women would succumb to deep tearing and internal sexual organ damage.
What bravery is it to live this life, Swara? I am sure you would know.
This is not a soccer stadium. It is a church.
This is not US. This is Chennai, India.
This is an Indian branch of Pentecostal assemblies of God denomination.
Just last year, their US headquarters faced a massive abuse scandal. Around 200 pastors were convicted of raping 500 children. In 2023, their director resigned over sexual abuse and trafficking of minors.
After losing face among US public, they seem to be concentrating their operations in India, which explains the massive foreign funding needed to build this Church. Does India provide safe haven for abusers and pedophiles as they are protected by minority appeasement?
Muslims pay less than 1% of taxes in Tamil Nadu.
Tamilnadu gets all its wealth from Hindu taxpayers and Hindu temples.
They use this money to fund WAQF board and Muslims.
Why are Hindu women excluded? This is open apartheid.
Illiterate FOOL @rohini_sgh.
You blabber nonsense without knowing anything. Dalits and OBCs already head major Hindu temples.
The richest and greatest Hindu temple, Tirupati , recently trained 1000 Dalits in Hindu scriptures. They have been serving as priests in temple. Majority on the TTD board also belong to OBC community.
Many other ancient temples in Andhra, Karnataka and Kerala train Dalits as priests.
https://t.co/50gdfdsBHO
What nonsense are you babbling?
I asked you for a single pre-20th century source for your claim that Chokhamela died doing forced labor. You have nothing.
You copied answer from an LLM and claimed that Bhaktavijaya had it. I showed you that is wrong. Now you have nothing. Instead of honestly accepting that the entire story was made up, you are babbling about primary and secondary sources. Let me tell you once again, the story doesn't exist in any primary or secondary source before 20th century that includes the so called "Varkari traditions" and Namdev's own writings. I have read them too and I continue to challenge you to produce evidence for your claim.
People who don't know anything about history come to challenge me by using LLMs. But the LLM is not trained on the data I have read as books. And it is not yet capable enough to correlate and pull into context the most relevant chunks and make inference from it.
Which is why your LLM is no match and I can destroy you in seconds. Case in point:
99% of Hindu households dont have original valmiki Ramayana, Vyasa Mahabharata and Vedas either. 99% of Hindus cannot speak Sanskrit or chant Vedas. 99% of Hindus have more knowledge of Bollywood and Cricket than the suktas of Rigveda.
Bhaiya aise 99% karte rahenge to kuch bhi nahi bachega.
Hey @RahulGandhi , your own grandmother Indira and your great-grandfather Nehru praised Manusmriti. Gandhi, whose surname you stole, also praised Manusmriti. Congress 1929 Purna Swaraj session quoted the Manusmriti.
If you are sincerely committed to your ideology, you must abdicate everything you inherited from these Manuwadis, including congress party.
You are either ignorant or lying.
I have read Mahipati's Bhaktavijaya. It simply doesn't have your story. The complete English translation is available online.
[https://t.co/LWMnImE32j]
It is an open challenge to you. Quote the page number which says Chokhamela died doing forced labor.
Either you have completely fabricated this or the LLM you copied from is hallucinating. In either case, don't come back to me with nonsense. I will easily dismantle your bullshit in seconds.
70% of the freedom fighters executed by the British were Brahmins.
They sacrificed their lives for the country. But what exactly did their sacrifice achieve?
Today their children and grandchildren are discriminated against by the Government. They are labelled as "oppressors" and systematically barred from education and jobs.
Is this how a country should honor those who gave up their lives for her?
Source: The plight of Brahmins by renowned historian Meenakshi Jain @IndicMeenakshi
(PS: I have not independently verified the numbers)
Atrocity literature produces new myths against Brahmins everyday.
The latest accusation is that Sant Chokhamela died because Brahmins made him do forced labor.
Here is my open challenge: Show me a single reference predating 20th century which says Sant Chokhamela died doing forced labor. Just one.
Hint: There is none.
Can you tell me why Dalit Mahars did not allow Dalit Mangs entry into the temple of chokhamela? Why did Dalit Mahars forbid Dalit Mangs from riding horses? Why did they send petitions to Peshwa against Mangs?
Or is this question out of syllabus in Ambedkarite history?
BTW, to answer your question, it was a Brahmin who fasted for days demanding entry of all Dalits into Pandharpur temple and eventually succeeded. It was he who empowered Dalits. Sane Guruji.
It was Sane Guruji, a Brahmin, who undertook a prolonged fast at the gates of the Pandharpur temple and successfully led the movement for Dalit entry into the temple.
Yet today, many Ambedkarite voices openly call for the death of Brahmins: including the children of Sane Guruji.
If even the descendants of a Brahmin who fought for Dalit temple entry are treated as enemies, what does that say about the ideology driving such hatred?
Delhi, 650 years ago:
India was under foreign Muslim rule and Sharia.
An old Brahmin decided to fight back.
He publicly performed Ghar Wapsi of thousands of Muslim men and women.
When this news came to Sultan Firoz Tughlaq, he offered two choices to the Brahman.
1) Islam.
2) Death by burning.
The Brahman chose death. He was burned to death in broad daylight. Even when his body was burning before his very eyes, he did not utter a cry. He had no fear and no regrets. Such was his dedication for the nation and dharma.
Today, the descendants of this Brahman are classified by Indian state as "oppressors" and systematically discriminated. Descendants of Firoz Shah, on the other hand, are classified as "oppressed" and given doles, freebies and reservations