23 Years old, Taken, Half Brazilian and Italian Creature, " Sulista ", Can speak Portuguese ( Brazil ) and English, still would like to learn other languages
As of now February 10th of 2024 and forwards, i have no wishes to discuss, conceptualize fan-content or support anything from: the " Godzilla " franchise, and TOHO.
Due to recent decisions made by them, in which by my views, show they have no respect for their consumers.
The research of those publications can't be done again, since that already has been: Well... Done. Unless they somehow find some sort of loophole...
Suchomimus is very unlikely to go away.
So, I gotta say this, because it seems that every time the Paleo Community kinda of forgets the purpose of taxonomic names, and I seem some people not really helping it in any way...
It's definetly, and I apologize, a stupid idea.
This decision can only inherently cause issues on how accessible knowledge of the taxon will be, since again, " Cristatusaurus " is not the name used in most of the publications surrounding the animal.
@kret_spec His older or current art? Because I think in his old art, he just traced over other existing art. Nowadays, I'm pretty sure he is 100% reliant on AI to do all of the " Process ", if you can even say any process actually occurs...
For something that is claimed all the time to be " Scientific Consensus ", it sure is pretty inconsistent on what take each individual person has on the topic...
Almost like it never truly had any well-built foundation, but I digress, this sh#t will never make any sense to me.
Last month, I had a discussion with someone, who claimed that every argument about Spinosaurus being lipless wasn't applicable
That person also claimed I did not hold any understanding about how soft tissues worked ( Neither did they, but... Whatever! )
So, there was only a obvious thing to ask... What conditions would make Spinosaurus Lipless?
" Look at Phytosaurs " they said, without elaborating ( Wonderful... )
Yesterday, a paper concluded ( dubiously ) that all Archosaurs would had " Lips "...
Including Phytosaurs...
PhP Ice Age is probably the best example of this, because it keeps the visual aesthetics of " Scientific Accuracy " that was primarily praised for, but aspects such as: Showcased Behaviour, Speculation, Discussions, Research, etc. Were all simply treated as afterthoughts.
The problem with this kinda of commentary it's how you end up with WWD 2025
You cannot give attention to only the visual aesthetics of " Scientific Accuracy ", if that also means or is used to sacrificed other elements that are: As important