Your chat in your page is not working, all calls made to your support service end in a call center in Asia, despite calling a European number, your 2FA does not work, you take weeks to solve an issue, you make a client subscribe premium support services that do not offer any solutions.
@romeu Quando estava na AE do Técnico, nos idos 2000s, fiz um A0 que espalhamos pela Universidade, justamente com o top 10 de cadeiras com a maior percentagem de chumbos, juntamente com um press release. A reunião seguinte no Pedagógico foi uma beleza
@dissidentwest The Life of Brian. At the time, it made an uproar on the conservative community. But seeing it in these days, it's right wing all the way. Specially all the scenes with the People's Front of Judea.
The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were horrific. No one denies that. But the "framework collapse" you're describing ignores a massive, documented asymmetry that every historian acknowledges: Japan wasn't some innocent victim swapping places with the U.S. It was the aggressor that launched an eight-year campaign of imperial conquest and industrialized atrocities across Asia before August 1945.
Here are the major accounts, all verified by tribunals, survivor testimony, and archives:
- Nanjing Massacre (Rape of Nanking), Dec 1937–Jan 1938: Japanese forces killed 100,000–300,000 Chinese civilians and POWs in weeks. Tens of thousands of women and girls (estimates 20,000–80,000) were raped, often in front of families, then bayoneted or burned alive. One-third of the city was looted and torched.
- Unit 731 (and related biological/chemical units), 1932–1945: Japanese army doctors conducted lethal human experiments on 3,000–12,000+ Chinese, Korean, Soviet, and Allied prisoners ("logs"). Vivisections without anesthesia, plague/anthrax infections, frostbite tests, gas chambers. They also deployed biological weapons in China, killing hundreds of thousands more civilians.
- "Comfort Women" system: 200,000+ women and girls (mostly Korean, Chinese, Filipino, Indonesian) kidnapped or coerced into military-run sexual slavery brothels across Asia. Systematic rape as official policy.
- Bataan Death March (Philippines, 1942): ~75,000 U.S. and Filipino POWs force-marched 60+ miles without food/water. Beaten, bayoneted, or shot if they fell. 5,000–10,000 died en route; survivors faced camps where 40% of Allied POWs overall perished (vs. ~4% in German camps).
- Sook Ching Massacre (Singapore, 1942): 25,000–50,000 ethnic Chinese rounded up and executed on beaches.
- Manila Massacre (Feb–Mar 1945): Retreating Japanese troops killed ~100,000 Filipino civilians in weeks of rape, arson, and bayoneting.
- Burma–Thailand "Death Railway": ~100,000–180,000 Asian forced laborers + Allied POWs died from starvation, disease, and abuse.
- "Three Alls Policy" (China, 1942–45): Official scorched-earth campaign ("kill all, burn all, loot all") — historians estimate 2.7 million+ Chinese civilians dead from this alone.
Broader toll (per R.J. Rummel and others): 3–10 million murdered 1937–1945, mostly civilians — Chinese, Filipinos, Koreans, Indonesians, Malays, Indochinese, plus Western POWs. Japan started the Pacific War with Pearl Harbor (2,403 Americans killed in a surprise attack) and refused surrender even after conventional firebombing of Tokyo killed ~100,000 in one night.
The atomic bombs ended a war Japan had no intention of quitting. U.S. planners projected 500,000–4 million Allied casualties (plus millions of Japanese) for the invasion of the home islands. It wasn't "violence done to Americans = atrocity; by Americans = context." It was stopping an empire that had already turned half of Asia into a charnel house.
Context doesn't disappear when the victims are American. It exists for everyone — including the 20+ million Asian civilians Japan slaughtered before the U.S. ever dropped a bomb. Ignoring that isn't moral clarity. It's selective amnesia.
Ou seja, quando foi o estado a falhar (Junta de Freguesia), a iniciativa privada (miúdos que doaram o seu tempo, e casal que dos seus rendimentos forneceu refeições) substituiu-se a ele e produziu resultados que a beneficiou (lucro). És tão bom em teoria económica como a jogar bola
Lmao, "bumbling child"? "Portuguese dad on his knee"? Projecting much? Your tantrum reads like someone whose entire history knowledge comes from Columbus Day parades and bad school textbooks. Let's torch the rest of your nonsense with actual facts, shall we?The "imprisonment in Hispaniola" a fabrication? Nice try, but no—it's rock-solid history. In 1500, the Spanish Crown sent Francisco de Bobadilla to investigate the flood of complaints about Columbus's tyrannical rule: torture, mutilations (cutting off hands for failing gold quotas), illegal enslavement of Taínos, hanging Spaniards without due process, and general brutality that shocked even 15th-century standards. Bobadilla arrived, found overwhelming evidence (including testimonies from Spaniards and locals), arrested Columbus and his brothers on the spot, chained them, and shipped them back to Spain in irons. Primary sources, Bobadilla's report (rediscovered in archives), and contemporary accounts confirm it all. The monarchs freed him upon arrival and called the chaining excessive (pity for the "discoverer"), but they permanently stripped him of the governorship and viceroy title—he never ruled again. That's not a happy ending; that's a disgraceful demotion. Cope harder. Columbus and "Magellan"? Two PR products Spain hyped to crash Portugal's party. Columbus grifted with fake distances and lies; Magalhães was a rejected Portuguese turncoat Spain used to claim they could compete. Neither had real merit in naval or exploration history compared to Portugal's systematic, science-driven empire-building (Prince Henry, Dias, da Gama, Cabral, Albuquerque). Portugal punched way above its weight with actual skill, not hype. Your "refutation" is just denial wrapped in insults. Screaming "AI" because you can't handle facts? Classic. Toodles yourself—go read a non-Spanish-biased book.
Oh dear, bless your heart for the fanfic-level defense of Columbus. But let's crank the acid and stick to facts Portugal actually earned: Portugal had the most advanced naval science and cartography in Europe by the late 15th century—caravels that could actually sail against the wind, precise astronomical navigation, portolan charts with latitudes, wind roses, the whole package built under Prince Henry and refined through decades of real expeditions. They weren't "focused" on India out of desperation; they owned the proven route around Africa (Dias 1488, proven by da Gama 1498) and were raking in spices without gambling on bad math or falsified logs. They had plenty of resources—gold from West Africa, slaves, trade monopolies under papal bulls—and still rejected Columbus's nonsense twice because their experts knew his distances were laughably wrong. Spain? Fresh off Reconquista, sure, but they bought the hype because they were desperate to crash Portugal's party. Then Portugal casually "discovers" Brazil in 1500 (Cabral, likely no accident given prior knowledge and winds), claiming a massive chunk of the New World under Tordesillas—while Columbus was still fumbling around the Caribbean thinking it was Asia. And Fernão de Magalhães? Portugal rejected him flat—King Manuel I saw through his demands, his spotty record (including shady dealings in Morocco), and his overblown pitch. Why fund a risky western route when you already had the eastern one locked down and the Spice Islands in your pocket? Magalhães (not the Spanish-rebranded "Magellan"—nice cultural appropriation there) got salty, switched sides to Spain, and Portugal treated him like the traitor he became in their eyes. His voyage? A mutiny-riddled disaster that cost most lives and proved nothing new—Portugal had already reached the far east via sea years https://t.co/TvVqxriinf yeah, Columbus grifted his way to funding with lies, got arrested for tyranny, lost the governorship forever, and needed royal pity to limp through a fourth voyage. Portugal built a sustainable global empire with science, strategy, and zero need for doctoring logs or rubbing rejections in faces.Your "understanding" seems stuck on Spanish hagiography. Do better—or at least read some actual Portuguese sources.
Para o trabalho que os caixas fazem hoje em dia, prefiro mil vezes fazer o check out eu mesmo. A única coisa que fazem é passar o código de barras no leitor e atirar o produto para o fundo do tapete. Para isso, perco menos tempo no self check out, fica organizado da maneira que eu quero e não tenho que levar com má disposição. Querem ter trabalho? Tornem-se essenciais e façam um serviço que acrescente valor à empresa
It would be more wonderful if you had the existing functions working properly like being able to load actual existing records for test, or, when selecting a record from a run, it actually translating to the next steps. And when submitting a ticket, they actually giving solutions, not saying you are going to escalate and then not solve the problem