@rwlesq@HistoryBoomer She put herself in that position though, so if it can be legally justified then her actions are to blame, she did not have to be there, she did not have to keep the car running, she did not have to be harassing them.
@RobHTX78@AnnieForTruth But sometimes what people define as "human rights" is involved in people getting more than they contribute. How do you define them?
@rudelypolite@Rambler2025@AnnieForTruth Exactly and both sides do this. Most of it is a charade masking the intention of people simply looking out for themselves wether it be financially or emotionally. Millions of people say "feed them" or "house them" whilst doing jack shit themselves to help.
@Dixie202021@AnnieForTruth Its so vauge it is meaningless. We are only capable of helping said people if resources are available to do so. So all he is saying is a society capable of doing so is an economically prosperous one. Otherwise its simply on an individual basis.
@gearshift100@joe4deadcat@BraddrofliT I fail to see how this is a rebuttal. There is competiton now. If you tax those with capital too highly they just take it elsewhere.
@TanzeyJon2991 @ennui365 Isnt that making the case for rich people? If they rise we also rise. Number of people below the poverty line is the same as it was in the 90s despite a near double in population.