We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.
We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.
Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.
And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.
The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.
We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.
Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.
So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The world is being told the war ends this weekend.
@ArmstrongEcon says that’s not the story we should be focused on.
The real story isn't oil prices. It's a debt bomb hiding behind them, and most people have no idea it's already lit... 🧵
The UK government says it wants to protect children from the dangers of social media. To enforce those restrictions, however, millions of people will be required to verify their identity and age through a government-approved digital ID system.
This represents a major expansion of government authority, introduced under the banner of safety and security, but laying the groundwork for a far more intrusive system of monitoring and control.
What begins as age verification today could become something much broader tomorrow.
@zeeemedia joins me to discuss the implications of digital ID, online surveillance, and how similar policies are spreading across the Western world, and making their way into the U.S.
Ask yourself why Elon Musk is always purporting to be aggressively against UK & Australia censorship but never says a damn word about what the power that be in the U.S. are doing.
People NEED to understand what level of censorship is in the works here:
🔔ICYMI: A controversial deal in the U.S. could fundamentally rewrite internet freedom as we know it.
The congressional deal would trade the deregulation of artificial intelligence for unprecedented federal censorship powers.
A high-stakes compromise is quietly brewing in Washington as the White House negotiates with congressional leaders to fundamentally reshape the digital landscape.
Under the proposed deal reported by Axios, the federal government would strip states of their authority to regulate artificial intelligence—effectively halting progressive state-level efforts to hold tech companies accountable and restrict energy-heavy AI data centers.
In exchange, lawmakers would push through three major federal censorship bills: the Kids Online Safety Act, the NO FAKES Act, and a federal online age verification mandate. While framed as common-sense protections for minors, civil liberties advocates warn these measures represent an unprecedented expansion of federal control over online speech.
The backlash to this legislative trade-off cuts across typical political lines. Even conservative-backed organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) have issued stark warnings, declaring that the package would dismantle the internet as we know it by empowering the Federal Trade Commission to dictate acceptable online speech.
Opponents argue that enforcing these rules would effectively eliminate online anonymity, while giving the administration an incredibly powerful tool to censor dissenting political views and control what users see on major platforms like Instagram.
As the White House maneuvers to secure congressional backing, Americans are left facing a troubling dilemma: the long-sought-after regulation of big tech and AI may come at the direct cost of their fundamental constitutional rights to free expression.
Source: Wilkins, J. (2026). Trump Moves to Deeply Censor the Entire Internet. Futurism.
🚨 BREAKING: It has been revealed that the public consultation data Keir Starmer is using to promote his social media ban did NOT have an ‘against’ option
I have no words. The UK govt is busy telling everyone they’re racist while their white women are being systematically violently raped and abused and white men are being beheaded in the streets. 87–95% of convicted perpetrators in child sexual exploitation cases were Muslim.
🚨UPDATE: TEXAS App Store Accountability Act, SB 2420, goes straight to SCOTUS!
On June 10 Students Engaged in Advancing Texas (SEAT) and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), filed emergency applications asking the Supreme Court to block TX's ASAA after the 5th Circuit issued a stay while the appeal proceeds on June 5th.
On Monday, June 15th, Justice Alito called for Texas to respond by June 22. 🧵
Ok, Elon. You criticize the UK implementing Age Verification. Great. Can you explain to everyone why you supported KOSA, which opens the door for platforms to implement Age Verification in the U.S. to avoid liability for “known” minors under the guise of “protecting children?”
RED ALERT: The UK is moving to ban social media for under-16s, but critics say the real goal is something far bigger, an age-verification system that could tie internet access to digital identity.
What’s being marketed as child protection is really a digital ID framework quietly being built into everyday online life.
Under the proposal, users could be required to verify their age through digital IDs, facial recognition, passports, or other approved methods before accessing major platforms. Opponents warn that once online activity is linked to real-world identity, anonymity disappears and monitoring becomes far easier.
The biggest question isn’t what happens in the UK. It’s what happens when governments around the world decide to copy it.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before this spreads to your country.
REPORT: JD Vance just confirmed that a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran is on the table as part of a potential peace framework.
After years of hearing that Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, critics are stunned that hundreds of billions of dollars could now be tied to a deal with the regime.
Vance said Gulf countries could fund the package if Iran dismantles its nuclear program, gives up its enriched stockpile, and submits to inspections.
Critics are already asking the obvious question: who makes sure that money doesn’t flow to Hezbollah or other Iranian proxies?
Because if a $300 billion reconstruction fund becomes reality, the debate won’t just be about peace.
It will be about whether the people making these promises can be trusted to enforce them.
@zeeemedia's full report breaks down the bigger picture.
DISTURBING: An Ontario man repeatedly cried out “Help me” during a government-approved euthanasia procedure after the drugs failed to work as intended, exposing a dark reality many people never expected to witness.
What was marketed as a peaceful, dignified death became a nightmare, leaving a family to watch their father’s final moments descend into chaos.
The man remained conscious and visibly distressed after sedation failed, repeatedly calling for help until additional drugs finally rendered him unconscious. His final moments, witnesses say, were marked not by peace, but by repeated pleas for help.
The case is fueling outrage because it wasn’t an isolated incident. Another Canadian patient resumed breathing after being declared dead, while a Belgian euthanasia case ended with allegations that a woman was suffocated after the lethal injection failed.
Opponents argue these cases expose a side of MAiD hidden from the public, one where procedures don’t go according to plan and families are left with traumatic final memories.
If a man can spend his final moments crying “Help me” in front of witnesses, what happens in the cases the public never hears about?
@zeeemedia's explosive report reveals why so many people believe this is just the tip of the iceberg.
The UK announces a social media age ban which is simply a trojan horse for Digital ID, Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion directly to Iran, and An Ontario man groaned, grimaced and repeated ‘help me’ while undergoing doctor-assisted death.
Join us in 10 mins: https://t.co/834vV9GOIU
Since this last appearance on Redacted, the U.S. has aggressively been introducing more and more UK-style Digital ID bills, largely led by Republicans. I'll be covering this in more detail in the coming days. Nonetheless, this is an important segment and still relevant today:
Last year, Australia announced a ban on social media for children under 16. Now, the digital identity systems designed to enforce those restrictions are spreading across the Western world, with the UK introducing an identical measure under the banner of “protecting children.”
These policies are not just about child safety, but about building the infrastructure for widespread digital identification and online verification, fundamentally changing how people access the internet.
@zeeemedia breaks down the disturbing Orwellian implications of these measures, why they are gaining traction across Western governments, and how similar policies are making their way to the United States.