Madridismo subterráneo. «The events depicted in this twitter account are fictitious. Any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental»
Me parece maravillosa esta toma. El momento en el que Rodri iba dialogar como una persona adulta funcional pero se da cuenta que es literalmente retrasado mental con IQ infrahumano así que no merece la pena. Cine.
kriminolojide mutlak bir kural vardır talep edilmeyen savunma en net itiraftır messinin durduk yere kimse bize hediye vermedi demesi tamamen bilinçaltını kemiren suçluluk psikolojisinin dışa vurumudur masa başı kupalarını kendi vicdanları bile kaldıramıyor tam bir freudyen vaka
Lionel Messi, one of soccer’s wealthiest and most famous stars, has become the subject of conspiracy theories from some World Cup watchers who accuse FIFA of displaying favoritism toward him and the Argentine team.
Read more: https://t.co/3DaHG1iqOy
Photo: Erick W. Rasco/Sports Illustrated via Getty Images
Mourinho lleva un Rolex Sea-Dweller.
No el Daytona del ganador. No el Day-Date del poder. El Sea-Dweller: el reloj de los que bajan a profundidades donde no hay luz, donde la presión aplasta cualquier cosa que no esté construida para resistir.
Diseñado para aguantar lo que nadie más aguanta. Sin diamantes, sin ceremonias. Solo acero y la certeza de que volverá a la superficie.
No sé si lo eligió por eso. Pero encaja demasiado bien para ser casualidad.
I just submitted an op-ed on this to Washington Post, discussing how technology cannot substitute human accountability. We must have transparency, or all the new rules and reviews create more opportunities for interference. With all due respect to one of the best referees in history I have to confront this assessment. It was technically BEFORE the goal in absolute time but not IMMEDIATELY before. It's quite a stretch of the normal logic to directly connect an accident near the goal area of one team to the action on the opposite side of the field. And since there was no arbiter's whistle to stop the game (wrong decision, agreed!), this violation cannot justify the decision to disallow the goal. And regarding the second incident in question, you are again correct stating that there was no violation of the rules against Salah, but this conclusion is reached after careful examination of the video footage from various angles. The referee during the game could not instantly verify it and considering the similarities of these two cases HAD to go to the monitor to confirm the assessment. By not doing so he simply reiterated our understanding that the game is being run by anonymous partisans behind the screens.
Incredible Egyptian goal is disallowed because of a foul far away, then same situation a few minutes later and goal for Argentina not disallowed! No VAR, nothing? FIFA again looks like a corrupt joke, playing favorites for stars.