Will C.

Husband. Friend. Gamer. Legal Scholar.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@r2_dabreezy @YFNArachnidY Like I said you dont need another love interest but its time for them to go.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@r2_dabreezy @YFNArachnidY Don't have to be another love interest but its time for them not to be in the movies anymore. We still need Harry.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@vicious696 Weird take, Doomsday is gonna do a lot better than spider-man

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@BasedMikeLee @KenPaxtonTX God has no gender dude

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@factpostnews Then the US doesnt need my money

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@Acyn Bruh Ingram looks like a foot

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@vicious696 Disney screwed up everything by not just recasting Kang. Doomsday is gonna feel so rushed and stupid

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@Rozz74637537571 @mehdirhasan Don't put words in his mouth

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@Bearded_donkey_ @Fightincowboy So only people are autistic have the sheer focus to do this?

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@Bearded_donkey_ @Fightincowboy Are they just artistic. Why they gotta be autistic aswell?

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@SenHydeSmith Mention everything in the bill you traitor

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@JoshuaKhane The should definitely reimburse you all that you spent on that account.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@the_jeffers @shinobi602 Josh Sawyer who was lead will be leading this so be quiet

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@ScubaSteve1219 @G27Status Might be way sooner than they most definitely will be using assets from the outerworld

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@TH3MAF1A @G27Status Might get it afterwards

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@ETESHADDAI @Colteastwood Dude its been damn near 20 years since skyrim and 10 years since fallout 4 cut the bullshit

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@Brittenter @AzPetrich We talking about the logic you imbecile. Stay on fucking topic.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@Brittenter @AzPetrich It is the same logic numbnuts. Racoon Thomas is stating the intent and the time of when it was ratified. Same can be said abkut the 2nd.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@k8smate @BasedMikeLee This case has nothing to do with bringing it to the current times its a 2 fold 1. Can POTUS amend the constitution with an EO. And 2. Redefine the 14th where it states all persons born... in which they did.

[Will C. @Zeraephim]

@k8smate @BasedMikeLee The 14th amendment was redefined in 1898, and this what SCOTUS has always used a precedent. Every other challenged was speaking on different clauses of the 14th only wong kim ark speaks on citizenship. Try again.