@MzwaneleManyi@Gjing_superman That's all you can say? I won't be surprised if you were to end the year with DA. You stand for nothing. No one takes you seriously anymore. Hence, the CIC didn't want to dignity your exit with the audience you desperately wanted. Mfmmm
@Mditshwer@Nqube12@jsteenhuisen Your affirmation is simply to say Apertheid was better than democracy and apparently you yearn for that past. That's why I have little respect for Black DA members. You wish to appease whiteness at every opportunity
@eNCA I'm giving the president 9 out of 10. Critical issues to be covered in a state of the nation were addressed. I expect the details from the plans of individual ministers.
@MorningLiveSABC It’s all at least within Bafana Bafana’s control at the moment. It’s up to them to ruin it. Simple,South Africa must beat both Namibia and Tunisia to qualify.
@ApostleDeza@CyrilRamaphosa Don't be too excited or overzealous. The enquiry can only start if parliament take such a resolution not the court. The president will take the matter to High Court because direct access is refused. Nothing grants parliament to resume any enquiry at present
@Charles48253336@MadzhieMashau Another stupid comparison. Board positions and company directors are business positions. They are not about leadership in the sense of SANCO. Zuma is just a pandemic.Sis
@NShezi@Thaliba77030187 In other words you concede that there was State capture under Zuma. Your point being that it has always been like that. Do I represent you correctly?
@azania1023 You are embarrassing yourself chief. This is president Ramaposa's urgent interdict application against Zuma's frivolous summons. It's a civil matter, the applicant is the president and the respondent is Jacob Zuma. Both the applicant and respondent don't have to attend court