@Faberkat@atensnut You're either a stupid person, a smart person who makes stupid comments or have a poor sense of how to construct a sarcastic comment. I'm putting my $1 on the first one.
@LindseyGrahamSC South Carolina would be fighting fire with fighting fire with fire. YOU started this fight. Literally every single person knows that this whole thing is your fault.
@BaronBoehm@DefiantLs I don't agree with her views, but to be fair, she didn't say that Charlie SHOULD BE SHOT because of the things he said, she said HE WAS shot because of the things he said. Of course, neither is okay, but she is not calling for violence, just calling out why the violence happened.
@chatswithem Are you seeing the same things I'm seeing? The reaction has been overwhelmingly to call for a war on the left. Overwhelming negativity toward Dems and "Leftists". Over whelming.
@AntiTyrant1789@LB23042@jakepaul 172 individuals who engaged in public mass shootings between 1966 and 2019. 97.7% were male. Ages ranged from 11 to 70. Shooters were 52.3% White, 21% Black, 8.1% Latino, 12.3% Other. 52 were registered or self-identified as Democrats, 49 as Republicans, 71 have no data available
@LB23042@laykenbovaird@jakepaul Her point, which is valid, is that everything has a cost. Every right, every convenience, every social construct results in a negative impact at some point in the system. I don't agree with Charlie's ideas, but I defend his right to have had them...
@jakepaul Charlie got shot for being good at communicating ideas. That's actually worse. The truth is subjective. Ideas are just thoughts. AND he was inviting spirited debate. Being murdered for an arguable point of view is far worse than being killed for telling the truth.