@mattkratter Have watched and followed you even before you were Bitcoin University.
Cannot understand your position since BIP110 which I supported.
We need you to come back Matt - you were the measured, intelligent voice of reason.
@stephanlivera@start9labs Hi Stephan
Appreciate you coming back to me.
Lessons learnt and clearly you were right and I was wrong.
BIP110 was morally and ethically the ‘right’ way to go. However the game theory spoke otherwise.
Nevertheless we are a little wiser and more informed now for the future.
@stephanlivera@start9labs Stephan that is incorrect.
Miners have everything to lose and that’s why there is absolutely no need for garnering ‘economic support.’ Game theory is sufficient for 110 to succeed.
Please do correct me if you think otherwise?
@Bob_cart124 What a despicable post for such a beautiful store and prayer facilities.
It is, as you say, a baklava store and not a mosque.
However they allow paying customers access to their prayer room and beautifully clean toilets.
Surely the reasons for this is plainly obvious.
Get a life
@theonevortex@murchandamus You are correct in your analysis - I am certainly not technical.
However, no technical expertise is necessary in understanding the ‘title’ of the Bitcoin white paper. Unless of course you want to re-name it - ‘Bitcoin: A Peer to Peer Electronic ‘Transaction’ System’?
@SafdarAlam Bitcoin is a singularity that can never be repeated.
Also, it is a protocol just like TCP/IP, and as such, protocol network effects apply. It is so huge now, that no other competitor could ever supersede it.
My advice - buy some, we are still early.
@SafdarAlam If the current foundational system is flawed - is it not time to move to another system which is fundamentally halal?
Could that new system be Bitcoin?
@stephanlivera@d0mesticblend You are my biggest disappointment in this whole Core 30 debacle.
Always listened to your podcasts.
Will never listen again.