It's devastating to have a tech-focused portfolio as of now. You need some serious balls to keep buying the dip. I've managed to erase a large part of my return rate, but if you have conviction and the fundamentals are right = hold.
@Norwegian_D 2. lost the debate or doesn't have a proper argument. Next, multiple lecturers are very left-wing, which causes the aforementioned issue. 3. People have social expectations, and the debate often becomes like "personal vs statistics" if you get what i mean
@Norwegian_D 1. Here is my take, not based on science or evidence. There are multiple problems with this: A lot of people have the wrong definition of racism, or there's some ambiguity about it, which leads to people calling other people racist in debates, often because the opposition has
We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date.
It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them.
We disrupted every operation in the report, and used the lessons from them to strengthen our safeguards. Where appropriate, we also shared what we found with authorities and other AI companies.
These cases are not typical: we’re highlighting some of the most sophisticated misuse we’ve seen. But they’re especially important to discuss, because they show us where AI misuse is headed, where our safeguards work, and where they need to improve.
We’re publishing this report so others can spot the same activity on their own platforms, and so we can give the public a clearer view of how emerging threats develop.
Read the report: https://t.co/0EJUnYEgfz