Jason 🧐

'' Niemand lebt lang genug, um zu erfahren, wie wenig sich niemand für niemanden interessiert.''

[Jason 🧐 @_4n52]

@KreuzAcht Sie war ja auch nicht lange dabei.
Es wirkt bisher eher so als ob sie (wie soviele bei der Truppe) nur auf den schnellen Erfolg aus war und jetzt sauer war, dass Sie nicht für den Landesparteitag nominiert wurde.

[Jason 🧐 @_4n52]

@Wehner84 @KreuzAcht @tobichrislorenz @neythomas Wirklich ausgetreten?
Hat sie sich nicht nur aus der aktiven Politik zurück gezogen?

[Carlo "Realism, Gedankenfetzen and Rants" Masala @CarloMasala1]

Aber um sich mit einem Jugendoffizier inhaltlich auseinanderzusetzen sind sie zu fragil, geistig noch nicht gefestigt genug und generell so leicht zu beeinflussen, die Kleinen.

Fragt sich, wer wen hier veräppeln will

[Kai Kuestner @KuestnerK]

#Trump hat sich endgültig auf die Seite von #Putin geschlagen. Geht's um Wahlkampf? Frieden? Nein. „Er will jetzt 2 Jahre lang sich und seinen Clan bereichern.” Sagt uns @jaegerthomas2 Und warnt Europa: „Politisch wird die NATO das nicht überleben.“ 👇 https://t.co/G7YuPHgI7X

[Thomas Jäger @jaegerthomas2]

https://t.co/3y6YyYdIzJ
Besten Dank an @KuestnerK für das Gespräch über Trumps Russlandpolitik. Warum macht er das?

[GAU @deaidua]

As US Secretary of the Treasury @SecScottBessent clearly has absolutely no idea what he is talking about and asks “Where is Germany?” when it comes to the supply of Patriot fire units and missiles to Ukraine, I thought this might be a good time for an educational tweet.

Let's first talk about the supply of fire units and afterwards about the supply of missiles. Germany, Mr. Secretary, has in fact supplied more MIM-104 Patriot fire units to Ukraine than the US has, despite owning and operating only a fraction of what the US owns and operates. About half of Ukraine's MIM-104 Patriot fire units came from Bundeswehr stocks.

A total of five fully equipped MIM-104 Patriot fire units were supplied from Bundeswehr stocks between 2023 and 2025 alongside a few extra launchers and most likely a spare radar unit. Germany began donating Patriot related equipment to Ukraine at the same time the US has and still does it until this day while the US has long stopped donating this to Ukraine.

Let's now talk about missiles. Together with every fire unit, Germany also donated a missile package. Known donations included for example 100 missiles and 64 missiles. That's substantial, but of course, this only guaranteed the immediate operational readiness of said fire units, nothing else. We didn’t have our own production facilities and our stocks weren’t even remotely as well-stocked as those in the US. The US (led by Biden) actually kept those fire units alive.

In February 2025, before the delivery of the last two MIM-104 Patriot fire units took place, before various donations via PURL and JUMPSTART took place and before Germany made several smaller missile deliveries from its own stocks, the German MoD confirmed to have delivered 328 Patriot missiles of various versions. By now the number of Patriot missiles already financed and delivered should exceed 500 easily.

But what about what's happening now? Germany has shown multiple times since President Trump took office that it is leading in the organisation, funding and delivery of new ammunition for Ukraine's MIM-104 Patriot fire units.

The German government has multiple times organized or tried to organize new deliveries for Ukraine. For example, in February 2026, Germany was in talks with multiple nations to find a total of 35 PAC-3 missiles for Ukraine. After weeks-long negotiations, 30+ were actually donated as a result of the German initiative. Germany was also — on the highest levels — in talks with Spain and Greece for the delivery of additional missiles.

But of course, we are doing things beyond. A lot of things. As already mentioned, Germany is actively funding Patriot missiles from the US both via JUMPSTART and via PURL. You shouldn't forget @SecScottBessent, that we are paying you for this. As recently as June 2026, Germany spent a total of $200 million on PAC-3 missiles via JUMPSTART and another $200 million on various missiles via PURL. Total donations already exceed $1 billion.

And now to the final and biggest part: In April 2026, Germany announced an enormous missile package for Ukraine. Over the following years, Germany will spend €3.2 billion to finance 600 PAC-2 GEM-T missiles for Ukraine's MIM-104 Patriot fire units — made in Germany by the way.

So please don't ask what Germany is doing for Ukraine. We do more for Ukraine then anybody else, including the US. All you do now is getting paid billions for the bare minimum.

PS: For full transparency it must be noted that multiple nations like Denmark, Lithuania and Norway above all have supported Germany financially in the delivery or re-procurement of MIM-104 Patriot fire units and missiles.

[Denis Trubetskoy @denistrubetskoy]

Hab mir kurz die jüngste Blödsinnswelle von Trump angeschaut und mich bei dem Gedanken ertappt, wie beruhigend Snooker am Abend im Hintergrund auf Eurosport nach 4,5 Jahren der Vollinvasion und der neuen Staffel des internationalen Zirkus doch wirkt. Da spielt zwar grad (Judd) Trump, aber das macht nix.

[Thomas Jäger @jaegerthomas2]

Darum geht es schon lange nicht mehr. Diesel, Putin haben nichts mit Wahlen zu tun. Es geht um Russlands Sieg gegen Ukraine und die Geschäfte (Lukoil u.a.), die winken. Trump läuft die Zeit davon, das noch einzutüten. Mit Krieg, Wahlen hat das nichts zu tun. Nur mit Bereicherung.

[𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵 𝓗𝓮𝓵𝓭𝓽 ↙↙↙ @Wehner84]

Wie viele dieser Geschichten braucht es noch, bis die Weltgemeinschaft da eingreift? Man sah schon bei den Nazis zu, will man dies erneut tun? Scheinbar schon.

[zharynka @tak_ya_anna]

So, are the United States and Russia now officially partners in deciding Ukraine’s future?

❗️Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reportedly stated:

“Zelensky refuses to negotiate because he knows that any deal acceptable to Russia and the United States would mean the end for him.”

Excuse me? Since when do Washington and Moscow get to decide what is acceptable for Ukraine?

Russia invaded our country, occupies our territory, kills our people, and commits documented war crimes.

And now Lavrov speaks as though Russia and the United States are negotiating Ukraine’s future between themselves?

Ukraine is not a bargaining chip. Our lives are not diplomatic currency.

If any agreement rewards Russian aggression or sacrifices Ukrainian sovereignty, it is not a just peace.

And if the United States supports such an agreement, it must answer for the political and moral consequences of that decision.

No decisions about Ukraine without Ukraine.

#Ukraine #Russia #USA #StandWithUkraine #InternationalLaw

[Thomas Jäger @jaegerthomas2]

Übersetze das mal: "Putin sagt mir, was er will und das mache ich. Der Narr aus den USA: DJT."

[Janis Kluge @jakluge]

If Musk is responsible for weakening Ukraine's defenses at this critical time, his businesses need to be excluded from any critical infrastructure in Europe. Not as a sanction, but as self-protection.

[Останній Капіталіст @Ostanniy_Cap]

Сенатор-демократ Джон Оссофф:

І поки навколо нас увесь світ палає, у Вашингтоні та Мар-а-Лаго розгортається небачене в історії Америки видовище корупції

Можливо, ви бачили, як Трамп у розпачі благає путіна про дизель

Але послухайте: у той самий час Білий дім домовляється про продаж російських енергоактивів на мільярди доларів людям, які фінансують родину Трампа та його передвиборчу кампанію

Ідеться про нафтові родовища, НПЗ та АЗС по всьому світу, які мають продати поплічникам першої родини за посередництва та підтримки уряду США

Пам'ятаєте Джареда Кушнера, зятя президента, так званого спецпредставника з питань дипломатії з росією та Близьким Сходом?

А пам'ятаєте іншого спецпредставника – Стіва Віткоффа, співзасновника каламутного криптобізнесу президента World Liberty?

Так от, стежте за думкою: Джаред і Стів саме зараз ведуть переговори з путіним щодо продажу російських нафтових родовищ, заводів та мереж заправок на мільярди доларів близьким друзям президента

До цієї справи також долучився шейх Тахнун, очільник еміратської розвідки, який вклав пів мільярда доларів у криптобізнес Трампа та Віткоффа

А ще брати Аль-Хаят – двоє сирійців, які фінансують багатомільярдний проєкт курорту Джареда та Іванки в Албанії

Третій партнер – це мільярдер і великий мегадонор Дональда Трампа. До речі, уряд Сполучених Штатів забере собі 15 відсотків

Загальна картина вже вимальовується?

У розпал глобальної енергетичної кризи зять президента та його бізнес-партнер організовують продаж російських нафтових родовищ друзям першої родини. Тим самим друзям, які вгатили сотні мільйонів доларів у бізнес родини Трампа

А ще є Марко Рубіо, який виділяє 1,6 мільярда ваших грошей на підтримку гірничодобувних інтересів синів Трампа в Казахстані. Чули про таке?

Піт Геґсет спрямовує сотні мільйонів доларів Пентагону на підтримку інвестицій Дона-молодшого в магніти

Венесуельські нафтодолари спливають на рахунках у катарських банках. Бо, бачте, вони і є ті самі еліти, які вдають, ніби ненавидять

І ось головне: якщо ви до цього причетні, наступного року ви піднімете праву руку і будете присягати говорити правду, тільки правду і нічого, крім правди, і хай допоможе вам Бог, перед Конгресом Сполучених Штатів

[Markus Bublitz @markus_bublitz]

Wenn die Union welter so einen Unsinn brabbelt, würde ich mich doch noch überreden lassen, dem KoaVertrag zuzustimmen. Das ist ja unerträglich.

Und übrigens @jbvolkmann , der nächste Anschlag in unserer Bundeshauptstadt würde dann auf Euer Konto gehen, wenn Eurem hirnverbranntem Unsinn irgendjemand folgen würde.

[Matt Murray @murraymatt]

To be clear: Some facts are neither in dispute nor unclear. Our photographer was clearly marked as Press. She was clearly beaten. These are not partisan or risible statements, but indisputable. We urge a thorough investigation and accountability.

[velocity @velocity_snow]

United States, why the FUCK couldn't you listen?
We in Europe listened, and we also tried to tell you.

Hillary was right about everything.

[Wieland Giebel @WielandGiebel]

Rationalitätsfalle. Darum geht es in meinem Buch „Die Schlacht um Kyiv“. Selenskyj wollte die Warnungen vor Putins Angriff nicht wahrhaben. Im Berlin Story Bunker zeigen wir in „Hitler – wie konnte es geschehen“ ein anderes Beispiel: Dänemark wurde im April 1940 mehrfach vor dem deutschen Überfall gewarnt. Erst im Mai 1939 hatte es mit Hitler einen Nichtangriffspakt geschlossen. 30.000 Soldaten wurden nicht mobilisiert, um Hitler nicht zu provozieren. Auch Selenskyj wollte Putin nicht provozieren.

[Wieland Giebel @WielandGiebel]

„Ich heiße Valeriia und komme aus Cherson. Das zerstörte Auto hinter uns kenne ich. Die Russen haben darin Oleh mit einer Drohne umgebracht. Ich habe nicht erwartet, das hier zu sehen, und ziehe meinen Hut vor Ihrer und Ennos Tätigkeit. Möge Ihre Arbeit weiter erblühen, wenn sie die Wahrheit zeigen.“

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

The Daily Mail has published an article by Boris Johnson entitled ‘Putin has a plan for Ukraine – a hideous and genocidal one. We’re all disgusted at Trump’s betrayal, but what is Europe’s plan to end this terrible war?’. And it very accurately raises the question not only of yet another blow dealt by the Trump administration to Ukraine, but also of the fact that Europe has still not formulated its own plan to end the war. This is a very telling article, given that Johnson once supported Trump and sincerely believed that he would be on the side of good.

Johnson begins with the story of Starshield. According to him, during yet another Russian attack, Ukrainian interceptor drones suddenly lost the ability to function properly due to restrictions imposed on the military version of Starlink. The decision to impose these technical restrictions was taken in the US without warning Ukraine.

“The Ukrainians had indeed been betrayed. It was the White House that had ordered a technical change to the operation of the Starshield system, a military version of Elon Musk’s Starlink, so that the interceptor drones became suddenly useless.”

“We feel a sense of dizziness, as though the team captain of the free world has suddenly been caught playing for the other side.”

The US effectively interfered with Ukraine’s defence efforts at a time when Russia was continuing to strike at Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

“Someone acting in the service of the President of the USA decided wilfully to sabotage the defences of a free, democratic and blameless people.”

Johnson links the reason to the diesel controversy. The US started a war with Iran, the Strait of Hormuz was blocked, oil prices soared, and the Trump administration decided to shift the blame onto Ukraine for the strikes on Russian oil refineries.

“So his brilliant diversionary strategy is to find a new culprit for the diesel price spike. He blames the Ukrainians, for attacking Putin’s oil refineries. Which is utterly ridiculous.”

Johnson points out that the Ukrainian campaign against Russian oil refining has been successful and has indeed made it more difficult for Russia to export fuel. However, the sharp rise in global prices was caused not by Ukrainian strikes, but by the US war with Iran.

“It wasn’t Zelenskyy whose rash and ill-thought-out military action led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.”

On the contrary, Ukraine is doing exactly what the West has been demanding for the past four years: cutting into Russia’s energy revenues and striking at one of the main sources of funding for the war.

Separately, Johnson refers to the Lindsey Graham Sanctions Act, which grants Trump vast powers to put pressure on buyers of Russian energy resources.

“If he were actually to use this Bill as intended, and cut off Putin’s main source of income, then he could help to bring the Russian tyrant swiftly to the table and get the war over.”

But Trump has done the opposite:

“So as things stand, the US government is not only willing to sabotage Ukraine’s defences, it is actually proposing to fund the Russian bombs.”

“Why it is that this US President is so bewilderingly weak towards Putin”

Johnson mentions possible compromising information and potential future business deals between Trump’s inner circle and Russia, but admits he has no answer. For him, something else is more important: Ukraine is critically dependent on American communications, intelligence and technology, and therefore Europe must urgently compensate for the risks created by Washington.

But the main problem is not Trump, but Europe itself. According to Johnson’s conclusion, the West has still not done enough to put pressure on Putin: Russian assets have not been confiscated, Russian gas continues to be purchased, and, most importantly, the US, the UK, France and Germany have still not defined what the end of the war should look like.

“We haven’t done enough to put pressure on Putin; we haven’t unfrozen his assets; Europeans still buy large quantities of Russian gas.”

“Neither side of the Atlantic – no one in Washington, London, Paris or Berlin – has been remotely clear enough about the terms on which Ukraine needs to finish the war.”

“The Ukrainians have fought heroically and they are winning. Putin’s losses are unsustainable – 50,000 last month. He cannot recruit replacements fast enough.”

But Putin, according to Johnson, will continue the war until he receives an absolutely unequivocal signal from the West that the subjugation of Ukraine is impossible.

“Ukraine must and will be free, and that Ukrainian freedom will be guaranteed within the western security architecture, and that means NATO.”

Johnson poses a very simple question:

“Putin hasn’t heard that message, or not for years – not even from this country. Why not? What are we afraid of?”

His proposal is also simple: to transfer Russia’s frozen assets to Ukraine, to provide all the necessary technology, and to finally define Ukraine’s place within the Western security system.

“The greatest thing we can give – the thing that will actually bring peace – is clarity about their future.”

“I can understand the hysteria and disgust about the Trump-Putin deal. But disgust is not a plan.”

“Putin has a plan for Ukraine, a hideous and genocidal plan. What is the western plan?”

[Thomas Jäger @jaegerthomas2]

PutinTrump vs. UKEU