@WalmartThomist@melodymlyons Nothing I disagree with in your post, but she might more be referring to explicit and detailed retelling of the sin, not just species and circumstances of the sin.
@AngAesthetics Yea we don’t receive latria but that seems separate from the question? On what basis does satisfaction have to be separate from participation? For us justification is more than application of remission as justif. is *constituted by* (not just followed by) participation in Christ
@AngAesthetics Right but if salvation consists in the restoration of humanity as such, doesn't that require derivative participation? God-to-man & man-to-man reconciliation both part of salvation being fully realized. Why say human -to-human is “in addition to” and not “outworking of”?
@AngAesthetics So if a person offers satisfaction for another through participation in Christ, why would this have to be “in addition to Christ” rather than a specific form or means of Christ's charity at work in saving / restoring humanity as a whole?
@AngAesthetics So you would agree that infinite satisfaction is not a concept that is interchangeable with the man’s own participation in the restoration of humanity?
@JoyceCarolOates It is a sacrament so language of sign is appropriate. Because Christ is substantially present under the signs (accidents) of bread and wine, we don’t believe the DNA is present. That would be a change of accidents (transaccidentation), not substance (transubstantiation).
@EsquireCatholic Idk is moving more and eating less just a more nuanced way of taking 20 laxatives a day? You’re losing weight either way so they’re pretty much the same right