Unbelievable new RBC report: Between 2015-2024, more than $1 trillion in investment exited Canada, making it the largest capital exodus in Canadian history.
This is the record of the Liberal government under Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney.
If doctors in 1950 could be catastrophically wrong about smoking, fat, and sugar while being completely confident in their recommendations...
And doctors in 1980 could be catastrophically wrong about margarine, low-fat diets, and dietary cholesterol while being completely confident in their recommendations...
And doctors in 2000 could be catastrophically wrong about opioids, hormone therapy, and Vioxx while being completely confident in their recommendations...
Why would you assume doctors today, working in the same institutional structures with the same pharmaceutical funding and the same regulatory capture, have suddenly figured it all out?
The system hasn't changed. The incentives haven't changed. The conflicts of interest haven't changed.
Only your willingness to believe them has.
The idea that anyone should be expected to risk their health “for the greater good” exposes a core flaw in modern medical ideology. It normalizes sacrifice of the individual in service of a system—and that is not medicine, it is collectivism.
No ethical framework should demand that a healthy person endanger themselves to protect someone else. Yet through relentless marketing, slogans, and institutional pressure, this logic has been made to seem virtuous, even unquestionable. That normalization did not happen organically—it was engineered.
The clearest example is mass vaccination policy, where healthy individuals, including children, are expected to assume risk in order to protect others who are elderly or already unwell. This reverses every principle of natural medicine and historical public health practice. At no point in history was it considered reasonable to endanger the healthy for the sake of the sick. Protection once flowed toward the vulnerable, not at the expense of the well.
This inversion has been sold as morality. In reality, it is propaganda. Society has been conditioned to accept collateral damage as an acceptable cost of “public health,” as though lives can be balanced on a spreadsheet and losses justified after the fact.
But life is not a statistic. Risk is not abstract when it is borne by a real person. And no institution has the moral authority to decide that one life is expendable for another.
The question that should be asked: who gets to define acceptable risk, and by what right do they place it on someone else’s body?
Government priorities of handouts:
To families who can't afford food:
$1,000
To rich Canadians who can afford a new EV:
$5,000
Raises for politicians:
$8,800+
It's all a joke, and you are the punchline.
@mverbora At this point, it's becoming easier and easier to see that they really don't care about anyone but themselves and whatever agenda they are trying to push...
“You weren’t misled by accident. You were given a version of truth so rehearsed, so repeated, that even doubt started to sound like denial.” - Julian Assange
A Thread Exposing the Orchestrated Lies Behind World Events🧵
1. The Plane Was Real. The Collapse Defied Physics.