@drewfanacc@therealdakka@oilysailor In a defiant act to demonstrate that he really wasn't at all triggered Drew liked his own tweet and then blocked. But please don't think he might have been triggered, don't publish that in the papers ๐๐
@drewfanacc@therealdakka@oilysailor You seem to misunderstand what 'trigger' means, you appear to be the only one being triggered here... you literally were triggered so much you made the first reply...
@RheaRay30 Assertions that this is all due to mis-applied VAR is nonsense
No FIFA statement or release has suggested or said this. Technically no reason has been given, only 'we've used Section 27'
'wrongly used' story is just the thing the US sports media has been drumming for 3-4 days
@yesnomaybeman@JCrop02 Correct, though not entirely sure what your point is... maybe hold of calling *me* dumb... they used section 27 which is the *how*, the section where they can make any decision they like...
That doesn't counter what I said or address the fact they never said an actual *reason*
@citrinecalico See, here we are back with everything being transactional, and you revealing you normally pay to be called things... and now you are asking me to continue so you can finish, despite just a moment ago calling that freakish...
You seem so rattled that all you are spilling all.
@JenkoKent@MikeTrudell "No. Every attempt is a genuine attempt at the ball."
I'm guessing you have genuinely never seen a game of football before this World Cup if you've never seen a challenge with no genuine attempt to win the ball...
@JCrop02 The screenshot is a factual screenshot of recommendations however, the assumption that anything was misapplied or they even know how the process was applied, is nonsense. It's purely some odd American sports media yarn.
FIFAs statement doesn't even make any mention of this.
@Aiden_101007 The appeals process is the process for a wronged party to put up case & challenge the decision
FIFA & their panel can act completely on their own accord
FIFA has NOT said VAR was mis-applied in any public statement.
That is purely the case the American media have been making
@Aiden_101007@davejsports@USMNT@FIFAcom U think u did something with this one didnโt u ๐ญ That's not what the *appeals* process does Aiden.
Fifa's disciplinary committee still sit and adjudicate on Red Card decisions, which is exactly how Qatar's Madibo has had his ban extended to 5 matches.
FIFA have full discretion.
@SchuermanATL@jayhawk040@TheLawyerCraig Youโve literally just had your leading scorer in competition restored to being able to play... what you said makes absolutely no sense, you've just had the 'adversity' removed... and been given an easier path...
@stuholden I mean, that is like the complete opposite of logic...
If they were admitting is was 'absolutely wrong' the card would be rescinded & the ban completely dropped.
The ban is suspended & willapply *without* prejudice if similar happens again, *that* is admitting the call was right.