"Labour is investing". No it isn't. This money is not coming from the Labour Party. Rather, the Labour Party is using the powers it has in government to force other people to invest in the enterprises they favour. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Last week I announced the biggest cash injection into social and affordable housing in 50 years
Today we announced the National Housing Bank to unlock £53 billion private investment and turbocharge house building
Labour is investing in Britain's renewal to make you better off
@Petercoville I can't see the relevance of the fact that they were elected. I'm suggesting that they are passing off the confiscation as investment of their own money. "Labour is investing".
@DamianLow3 Are you saying the Labour government caused this increase or just that it happened after they came to power. If you are saying they caused it, how?
@SHamiltonian Economic planning can't be done by anyone, including by people with PhDs in economics. Why do these jobs even exist? Why is there a Minister for Financial Services?
The shame in the ruling is that it is needed. The need arises from the Equality Act. The whole business of who can play in which tournaments and piss in which loos and all the rest of it should be a matter for the owners of the loos , tournaments and all the rest of it.
The biggest net result of today’s Supreme Court ruling is that trans people will be more scared and their lives more difficult.
It’s up to those who stand by trans people to make sure their lives are as easy, comfortable and safe as possible under any legal reality.
Imagine just half the energy campaigning against trans rights had been put into
- Fighting the underfunding of women’s refuges
- Fighting for single mums
- Fighting for low-paid women
Compared to fighting trans rights, which would have had most impact on women’s lives?