In my field, all good technical conferences are double blind. I really don’t see the point. Perhaps you are in a different field that doesn’t have this practice which could be a shame. CVPR aaai ICLR NeurIPS icml iccv eccv….
But I’d like to think academic review is meritocratic
World models don't run on scraped text. They need continuous, multimodal observation of the physical world: labeled, time-stamped, geo-grounded.
Voxel51's @_JasonCorso_ writes for @FortuneMagazine, "AI models are choking on junk data."
The 15-minute high-level board update is a trap. Without the details, advisors just pattern-match onto other companies and give generic, parrot-like advice.
My take: Boardrooms need to operate like university labs. Block out 90+ mins for 1 hard topic. Detail matters.
TAF Series #18: https://t.co/f06E8tJGLz
@CSProfKGD Yes this is a key point.
But what I would like to see more of these days is actual discussion amongst reviewers, especially those in disagreement.
"Disagree and Commit" is the hardest shift for technical founders who are used to being "right." If you're still second-guessing a team decision 2 weeks later, you're the friction.
My take: Conviction > Certainty.
Read the full essay on navigating constructive confrontation: https://t.co/BSMRIlo1Kn
@taiyasaki@overleaf Let’s see, what’s the prompt? Hey Claude, help me reimplement an overleaf like web based collaborative editor for latex and make integration with you and other LLMs first class. Let me know if you have questions. I’ll be back in 48 hours.
Show me the impact not the paper count. Paper mills outputting LPUs are a cancer to the field.
And the data seems incomplete. In aggregate what about all of the institutions less than paper threshold here.
someone analyzed all 5000+ accepted papers at ICLR 2026, and it's a good signal who's pushing the research of AI:
> China has surpassed the US with 43.7% of the papers
> Europe's contribution is surprisingly small (5.3% including UK)
@adamnemecek1 and github should kill stars and just replace them with the number of other projects that depend on a certain project. stars are a microeconomy. evil