Most scheduling tools rent you access to social accounts.
Palactix lets you own the infrastructure.
The difference?
Hootsuite: Client authorises Hootsuite → you rent access
Palactix: Client authorises YOU → you own connection
Switch tools with Hootsuite? Reconnect all 50 clients.
Switch from Palactix? Your connections come with you.
This is why smart agencies think infrastructure, not features.
This one trait gives any Eloquent model a full MCP server:
use HasMcpTools;
Schemas auto-generated. Tenant scoping. Lifecycle hooks.
Built on laravel/mcp ^0.7
https://t.co/o2n9igWSKK
@taylorotwell
Laravel MCP is powerful, but exposing models to AI still means writing a lot of Tool classes.
So I built a missing layer:
→ Turn Eloquent models into MCP tools with one trait
Feels like API Resources — but for AI.
https://t.co/o2n9igWSKK
This one trait gives any Eloquent model a full MCP server:
use HasMcpTools;
Schemas auto-generated. Tenant scoping. Lifecycle hooks.
Built on laravel/mcp ^0.7
https://t.co/o2n9igWSKK
@taylorotwell
Stop writing MCP tool classes by hand in @laravelphp
You shouldn't need 50 files to let AI talk to 10 models.
'palactix/eloquent-mcp' ships the missing layer.
One trait. Auto-generated tools. Production-ready.
'composer require palactix/eloquent-mcp'
Got the paid subscription for @claudeai Pro and hit the usage limit within just 2 hours.
Didn’t even start real development, was only explaining feature requirements.
For a “Pro” plan, limits this tight make it hard to actually get meaningful work done.
The founders who survive without funding usually understand customers better than investors.
Money helps scale, but survival skills build the foundation.
Most agencies don’t realize they've outgrown their tools.
It usually starts between 15–25 clients.
Not with failures - with small friction:
• More reconnect requests
• Waiting for feature updates
• Clients asking "Why am I authorizing another company?"
Growth exposes structure.