@SteveSmith56721@Ahmodi1014946@Walkinghosteed In tech? We do. But Indians are on another level my brother. Trust me. At my company everyone offshore works 60 hour weeks. That’s their full time. 40 hours would be part time for them brother.
@SteveSmith56721@Ahmodi1014946@Walkinghosteed Tell that to the banks, hospitals, and entertainment companies. Americans say we don’t need Indians but in anything slightly tech related, they run it. I’ve worked at three different tech companies and Indians were top workers at them all. We don’t work like they do.
@enesovat22 And you believe the creator of the heavens and the earth was a Palestinian man that had to grow in knowledge and didn’t know figgs were out of season. 🤦🏾♂️
@milkedstudios@One_Dawah@IbnMahbub_ So calling out the mushriks from within the ottomans and Mexccans constitutes mass takfir? Do you believe grave worshippers shouldn’t be ex communicated?
@mannnyboyy@One_Dawah@IbnMahbub_ Can you provide evidence of him actually takfiring the entire ummah and making their blood halal? Please provide evidence of the British Jewish conspiracy. And I take from scholars based off their theology. But you guys seem to take from scholars based off politics.
@H1dd3nH4nd@muslimorthodoxy My og claim was John’s interpretation of Logos was platonic. I’ve already proven that. And sent sources. Not going to waste my Juumah going back and forth with someone who can’t even track a convo. Enjoy your weekend man.
@H1dd3nH4nd@muslimorthodoxy You can’t track lol I’m convinced. My argument from the beginning was Platonism influenced John. You’re the one that keeps making up imaginary strawmans. Scholars don’t compare the CONFIRM John was influenced by Platonism.
Never argued multiple divine persons. Strawmanning lol.
@H1dd3nH4nd@muslimorthodoxy to Philo. The similarities are the preexistence, divine agency, and role in creation, the major difference is that John’s Logos becomes flesh. So the argument is INFLUENCE AND ADAPTATION, NOT COPYING OR BORROWING…
@H1dd3nH4nd@muslimorthodoxy Open your eyes. Read carefully. Please.
John 1:1 isn’t “Platonic” in the sense that John copied Plato. The point is that John uses Logos a concept already known in Hellenistic Jewish thought as a preexistent divine mediator involved in creation. That’s why scholars compare John
@H1dd3nH4nd@muslimorthodoxy Btw William Lain Craig is a Christian scholar. He debated Muslims. He has no incentive to defend my position he’s simply an honest scholar that understands history and can call a spade a spade. Something you can’t seem to do.
@H1dd3nH4nd@muslimorthodoxy We were never arguing if philo’s logos became flesh and was called Jesus. Stop being disingenuous. I’m arguing that John’s understanding of Logos was influenced by platonists before him.