If you want to opt out of the NHS data sharing. You must act before the 21st of June. This may help. You will need your NHS number. https://t.co/DLCdgko9vZ
@TNHawk_92@AndrewKolvet This is no longer Charlie's dream..his dream and company were hijacked by pure demons pretending to be his friends...I can't wait for the whole damn thing to implode
You can't explain this away.
These are documented patterns of high-level people being visually identified by Fort Huachuca-based personnel in the weeks and days leading straight into September 9, 2025.
Let’s walk through it chronologically, person by person.
Challenging Islamphobia
“Let me see if I understand this. Muslims have a problem with gays, bacon, dogs, people drawing pictures of their prophet, women showing hair, music, they think it's okay to marry a 6-year-old, but if I have a problem with Muslims, then I'm the problem?”
All of this is accurate, here’s the fact check:
Bacon/pork: Yes, explicitly prohibited (haram) in the Quran for observant Muslims.
Women showing hair: Quran 24:31 and hadiths require hijab modesty covering hair in public for women
Depictions of the Prophet: Strong prohibition on images of Muhammad
Music: Many hadiths criticize instruments and certain music as haram or makruh; opinions can be total ban
Dogs: Dog saliva is considered ritually impure in most schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Keeping dogs as pets is discouraged or forbidden
Gays and homosexuality: Islam condemn it. Criminalized with severe penalties
Marrying a 6-year-old refers to the hadith accounts of Aisha’s marriage to Muhammad (betrothed at 6-7, consummated at 9). This is acceptable
Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization
@JoeySalads@FullRetardRadar If you think that behaviour to a little toddler then you're just as disgusting as that pathetic excuse of a mother and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children..ffs
🚨🇬🇧 La police ignore les immigrés qui harcèlent une femme chez elle et la menace ensuite d’arrestation pour « haine raciale » si elle dénonce les faits. Maintenant, l’homme qui l’a exposé est menotté.
Une femme est harcelée à son domicile par des immigrés. Elle appelle la police, qui ne fait rien.
Quand elle menace d’aller voir la presse, on la menace d’arrestation pour « incitation à la haine raciale ».
Le citoyen journaliste @ActivePatriotUK a publié les infos et a été arrêté pour « communication malveillante ».
Il a été détenu jusqu’à 23h, son téléphone confisqué, et libéré sous caution pour 3 mois avec des conditions strictes qu’il ne peut même pas mentionner.
C’est la réalité du Royaume-Uni aujourd’hui.
Que pensez-vous de cette affaire ?
A. La police protège les coupables et réprime les victimes
B. La liberté d’expression est morte en Grande-Bretagne
C. C’est un cas isolé
D. La police fait son travail
🇫🇷 Soutenez-nous en nous suivant sur 𝕏 🌐 Notre Telegram en cas de censure : https://t.co/7BI2uMGmUb 🇫🇷
A leaked internal home office report from 2002 shows the UK Government had planned to change what "British-ness" meant through mass immigration
It was always the goal to erase our identity and replace us
I’ve watched the footage of Birmingham Police and it’s clear that the drunk, white guy was the victim of assault but somehow he was arrested whilst the culprits weren’t.
Another example of two-tier policing which most of Parliament doesn’t want to talk about.
I genuinely can't believe Birmingham Police have posted this.
Instead of acknowledging the mistakes made, they appear to be doubling down.
They're even asking people not to share the footage, because, in my opinion, they are clearly in the wrong here.
This video has already circled the world multiple times.
People will keep sharing it because the video has raised major questions about whether the policing was fair and proportionate. The public have every right to scrutinise incidents like this.
Candace Owens just presented irrefutable evidence that Charlie Kirk’s Rode microphone, the one worn under his shirt, was shattered into countless pieces. 👀💥
The transport vehicle’s floor is covered in minuscule shards of tempered glass, identical to the kind used in the Rode microphone on Charlie’s person when he was “shot.”
It’s inexplicable that this crucial detail hasn’t been mentioned by Charlie’s friends or his security team, who were supposed to be responsible for his care during his hour of need.
I don’t see any plausible explanation for this evidence that fits the official narrative.
The FBI, local law enforcement and TPUSA have a lot of explaining to do.
So. Scotland Yard are apparently being forced to re-open 4000 plus rape gang cases going back to 2010 across London.
Does this mean that both Mark Rowley and Sadiq Khan who denied that there was a problem, will now resign and face investigation, and possibly prosecution for denial and cover up of the scandal?🤔
🚨 SHOCKING: Hard to watch. A white teen curls up in the fetal position while a large group of black teens brutally punch, kick, and stomp on him over and over.
Are these people animals?
A. Yes
B. No