NeonZion

EoZ: 5.21
These beasts, it is true, Falls asleep again every time they have drunk their fill of blood and at such time can easily be reverted into their chains.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

Brahmansism, Hinduism and Secularism; the Trifecta of understanding political control and its relationship with Shudras and the Bhakti movement.

Rise of Protestant movement which made way for Separation of the state and church, gave rise to Secularism , however we don't find the same separation between the Brahminism and Hinduism, although movements like the Bhakti movement seems to make an attempt to bring Gods beyond the control of Hindu clergy yet such attempts fails upon the anvil of reforms as the core of Bhakti movement through it constituting elements like Naam Japa and Kirtan points towards the attempted inclusion of the Shudras within the Hindu fold, while remaining subservient to the Idea of Brahminism and the authority of the Brahman is not challenged;

To further substantiate the deep rooted Mindset against Shudras, i would point towards the statements of the current ShankarAcharyas of Puri and of Joytir matha, who on record have categorically denied the right of Shudras to take Sanyas, pointing out that the religious text do not permit for such a thing. what's also interesting is the caveat drawn by ShankarAcharya of Puri who say that "Dharam is cheez ki anumati (Shudras to take Sanyas) nahi deta, parantu kisi ko phal se vanchit nahi keya hai", implying that if a Shudras wants to attain moksha, they can only do so by serving the 3 Dwija i.e., Brahmin, Kshatriya & Vaishya (as is stated in the Shastras upon the Duties of a Shudras); It seems The Bhakti movement was started for allowing the Sudras with an alternative to the "PHALA" for furtherance of their Spiritual journey within the Hindu fold and such was done while keeping the Hindu clergy in the center, Rituals still remained closely guarded by the Brahmins and were only reserved for the Dwija, Showing that unlike western Secularism where the Ideas was of undoing the control of clergy upon Christian Faith, Bhakti movement was a rather pacifist movement designed at curbing the growing discontent among the Shudras; constructed to proactively manage their discontent after observing their upward economic mobility in the society, which if left unattended would surely pose a threat to Brahmin's Ideological hold on Hinduism as fewer patrons would financially aid towards the furtherance of their ritualistic practices while at the same time subscribing to opposing or divergent ritualistic sects including but not limited to Buddhism, Jainism and Islam, followed by Patronage to Christians.

Over at least the last two millennium the Brahmin always made sure he was not only politically powerful and but socially relevant, be that through declaration of kings divine authority, linking the births, birth of their Dynasty to mythological figures, Mythological stories or by comparing their rule with those experienced in the different lokas and further the use of religious Texts like the Manusmriti, Ushna Smriti to subjugate the general populous; thereby effectively using the carrot and the stick approach for their political holds; Carrot for the Kings and Stick for everybody else. These texts openly advocated for the exclusion of Shudras from ritualistic elevation and even mandates punishment for Shudras making found guilty of attempting such feat, thereby exercising control over them through the executive, legislative and since the judiciary comprised of those who have been educated under such texts it would naturally cohort the like minded, thereby making the Shudras hapless upon the desires of the Brahmin controlling the entire system.

Inclusion was the bait. Hierarchy was the hook, the door to heaven was cracked open but the keys are yet to be surrendered, Bhakti movement did not break Brahmanism. It taught the excluded to sing inside it—and called that liberation.

PS: This piece is confined towards the North Indian Bhakti movement which came about in the 15th century, while South India's Bhakti movement deserves it own elaborate piece to justify its history from the 7th century.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@ripper_dhruvaa jo apne Logo me badlav nahi la Sakte woh logo(people) me badlav layenge.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@ARanganathan72 There is a difference between indoctrination and radicalization and Sar Tan Se Juda is its Metamorphosis.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@smitaprakash @AdityaRajKaul isse acha Tab ya Ipad hi lelo

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@Aishuarya123 @JaipurDialogues @myogioffice @Uppolice Critical Edition of Ramayana is published by the Oriental Institute at Maharaja Sayajirao (MS) University of Baroda, It contains both the Baal kand and Uttar kand.

BORI exclusively publishes Critical edition of MahaBharath.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@LtGenDPPandey Everybody likes a little attention, if you are single, there is nothing wrong in it.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@IshaC59815 Very well Put.

The Idea of Pashu, Veera and Daiva needs to be promoted more so that such people stop imposing their mold onto everybody else.

[Mota Bhai - The Proud Hindu @THEHINDUPUTIN]

Best Example of Hindu Unity.

Gopal Mukherjee ji who saved Hindus in 1946 had a Meat Shop with the name - 'Maa Kali Meat Shop.'

Any sane person will say his Contribution to Hindutva is always bigger than of Dhirendra Shastri ji.

Jai Shri Ram.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

All Alleged Hindu Hriday Samrat today were Peacefull lovers before 2014, completely endorsing the left-Muslim coalition. BJP made them the Hindu supporters they are today and now they plot to bite the Hand that fed them.

It really shows that these people are neither leftist nor rightist nor centrist, they are only gluttonous for power, if today congress could have offered that you could have seen them supporting the left-Muslim coalition.

And btw this was @ajeetbharti before 2014.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@ADumbEngineer14 @Nikhat_bhabhi @JaipurDialogues @myogioffice @Uppolice people are even ready to deny history.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@Nikhat_bhabhi @JaipurDialogues @myogioffice @Uppolice Did they not marry?
was Ayesha not 6 when she got married?

what exactly is cooked here?

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@THEHINDUPUTIN For Hindu unity?? That's basic decency dude; until any practice interferes in your way of life, you having no right to dictate someone else's life.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@Saptarship1318 Bijoya Ray was his maternal Uncle's daughter; the tradition of marrying into the mothers family happens even in South Indian Brahmin Families.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@peeleraja Well the imposition of the Brahmanical will upon other traditions is not something new.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@abbajabbadaba The Statue has a Third eye & his ears are of normal size; Such iconographies style are not present in Buddhist Traditions.
However the Mythological deity Kaal Bhairav is common to both Post vedic Hinduism and Later Buddhism, as both draw from the same principles of Tantra.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@amitkilhor Amit ji Apki toh soach bhi greeb hai, economy class ki age nahi badre 😭, Baba ji apne private Jet se Ghumte hai.

[Churchill Aheer @ChurchillAheer]

We all know categories like GEN, OBC, and SC, but what is the deal with "Dominant OBC" and "Dominant SC"?

Simply put: whenever certain OBC or SC caste groups stand up against Savarna hegemony and refuse to take any injustice lying down, upper castes try to sideline them by sticking them with those "Dominant" labels.

[Amock @Amockxil2029]

On Instagram this edit feature shows only to the user who commented.

He created a fake account then commented and took screenshot.

[NeonZion @_NeonZion_]

@Chaithu_Bluskys @Woundedlioon @Delhiite_ had put their names in the OP