Olivia
Online
NotYourDoctor
@_NotYourDoctor
Everything that matters for your optimal health that your Doctor likely hasn't told you.
Ireland
Joined April 2024
837 Following
706 Followers
5.8K Posts
Whatever about the specifics of this case, the whole "Pandemine" theatre etc., what has happened here was an accident waiting to happen.
The nub of the issue is the now firmly established politiicisation and bureauocratisation of medicine: the notion that there exists specialist experts who are the inspired guardians of "the ScienceTM" and all others, from the public through nurses, CAM practitioners and indeed all doctors, once questioning the expert consensus on any given matter are bringing nothing but confusion, error and even dishonesty to the table.
Thus whille actual patients may well benefit greatly from encountering a variety of views and clinical orientations, any cicurmspection, nuance or doubt concerning the medical consensus is coded as dangerous and deceptive.
The IMC appears to act not so much in the interest of Irish patients but essentially to protect the phoney "mighty Wizard of Oz" that is "best practice, evidence based medicine".
Anyone working in the field will known that umpteen medics, GPs and consultants are quietly acknowledging daily that these vaccines have caused and are causing a wide variety of health issues for recipients, from mild to serious and even fatal. (Mostly we hear of issues in cardiology, rheumatology, oncology but also neurology, gynaecology, dermatology etc.)
Dr Marcus is not so much a voice crying in the wilderness: he's simply one of the very few that has had the courage to voice his well informed if non-consenus abiding take throughout the "Covid era".
It is difficult to see an immediate postive path forward. As with the advanced bureauocritisation of any profession, here medicine of course, it seems inevitable that the IMC will continue to act to protect the "profession" rather than Irish patients.
Eventually medicine as currently operated will collapse under the weight of its own failings and runaway costs. Till then patients will be forced to advocate for themselves, try to educate themselves and seek out thougthful and skilled clinicians who may have some of Dr de Brun's abilities if little of his courage.
@Jklunden https://t.co/AieGH9edUk
Whatever about the specifics of this case, the whole "Pandemine" theatre etc., what has happened here was an accident waiting to happen.
The nub of the issue is the now firmly established politiicisation and bureauocratisation of medicine: the notion that there exists specialist experts who are the inspired guardians of "the ScienceTM" and all others, from the public through nurses, CAM practitioners and indeed all doctors, once questioning the expert consensus on any given matter are bringing nothing but confusion, error and even dishonesty to the table.
Thus whille actual patients may well benefit greatly from encountering a variety of views and clinical orientations, any cicurmspection, nuance or doubt concerning the medical consensus is coded as dangerous and deceptive.
The IMC appears to act not so much in the interest of Irish patients but essentially to protect the phoney "mighty Wizard of Oz" that is "best practice, evidence based medicine".
Anyone working in the field will known that umpteen medics, GPs and consultants are quietly acknowledging daily that these vaccines have caused and are causing a wide variety of health issues for recipients, from mild to serious and even fatal. (Mostly we hear of issues in cardiology, rheumatology, oncology but also neurology, gynaecology, dermatology etc.)
Dr Marcus is not so much a voice crying in the wilderness: he's simply one of the very few that has had the courage to voice his well informed if non-consenus abiding take throughout the "Covid era".
It is difficult to see an immediate postive path forward. As with the advanced bureauocritisation of any profession, here medicine of course, it seems inevitable that the IMC will continue to act to protect the "profession" rather than Irish patients.
Eventually medicine as currently operated will collapse under the weight of its own failings and runaway costs. Till then patients will be forced to advocate for themselves, try to educate themselves and seek out thougthful and skilled clinicians who may have some of Dr de Brun's abilities if little of his courage.
Whatever about the specifics of this case, the whole "Pandemine" theatre etc., what has happened here was an accident waiting to happen.
The nub of the issue is the now firmly established politiicisation and bureauocratisation of medicine: the notion that there exists specialist experts who are the inspired guardians of "the ScienceTM" and all others, from the public through nurses, CAM practitioners and indeed all doctors, once questioning the expert consensus on any given matter are bringing nothing but confusion, error and even dishonesty to the table.
Thus whille actual patients may well benefit greatly from encountering a variety of views and clinical orientations, any cicurmspection, nuance or doubt concerning the medical consensus is coded as dangerous and deceptive.
The IMC appears to act not so much in the interest of Irish patients but essentially to protect the phoney "mighty Wizard of Oz" that is "best practice, evidence based medicine".
Anyone working in the field will known that umpteen medics, GPs and consultants are quietly acknowledging daily that these vaccines have caused and are causing a wide variety of health issues for recipients, from mild to serious and even fatal. (Mostly we hear of issues in cardiology, rheumatology, oncology but also neurology, gynaecology, dermatology etc.)
Dr Marcus is not so much a voice crying in the wilderness: he's simply one of the very few that has had the courage to voice his well informed if non-consenus abiding take throughout the "Covid era".
It is difficult to see an immediate postive path forward. As with the advanced bureauocritisation of any profession, here medicine of course, it seems inevitable that the IMC will continue to act to protect the "profession" rather than Irish patients.
Eventually medicine as currently operated will collapse under the weight of its own failings and runaway costs. Till then patients will be forced to advocate for themselves, try to educate themselves and seek out thougthful and skilled clinicians who may have some of Dr de Brun's abilities if little of his courage.
@AnMailleach https://t.co/AieGH9edUk
Whatever about the specifics of this case, the whole "Pandemine" theatre etc., what has happened here was an accident waiting to happen.
The nub of the issue is the now firmly established politiicisation and bureauocratisation of medicine: the notion that there exists specialist experts who are the inspired guardians of "the ScienceTM" and all others, from the public through nurses, CAM practitioners and indeed all doctors, once questioning the expert consensus on any given matter are bringing nothing but confusion, error and even dishonesty to the table.
Thus whille actual patients may well benefit greatly from encountering a variety of views and clinical orientations, any cicurmspection, nuance or doubt concerning the medical consensus is coded as dangerous and deceptive.
The IMC appears to act not so much in the interest of Irish patients but essentially to protect the phoney "mighty Wizard of Oz" that is "best practice, evidence based medicine".
Anyone working in the field will known that umpteen medics, GPs and consultants are quietly acknowledging daily that these vaccines have caused and are causing a wide variety of health issues for recipients, from mild to serious and even fatal. (Mostly we hear of issues in cardiology, rheumatology, oncology but also neurology, gynaecology, dermatology etc.)
Dr Marcus is not so much a voice crying in the wilderness: he's simply one of the very few that has had the courage to voice his well informed if non-consenus abiding take throughout the "Covid era".
It is difficult to see an immediate postive path forward. As with the advanced bureauocritisation of any profession, here medicine of course, it seems inevitable that the IMC will continue to act to protect the "profession" rather than Irish patients.
Eventually medicine as currently operated will collapse under the weight of its own failings and runaway costs. Till then patients will be forced to advocate for themselves, try to educate themselves and seek out thougthful and skilled clinicians who may have some of Dr de Brun's abilities if little of his courage.
Indeed Gerard. There are others' whose actions bear more scrutiny now than those of @indepdubnrth in all of this certainly.
Whatever about the specifics of this case and the whole "Pandemine" theatre etc., what has happened here was an accident waiting to happen.
The nub of the issue is the now firmly established politiicisation and bureauocratisation of medicine: the notion that there exists specialist experts who are the inspired guardians of "the ScienceTM" and all others, from the public through nurses, CAM practitioners and indeed all doctors, once questioning the expert consensus on any given matter are bringing nothing but confusion, error and even dishonesty to the table.
Thus whille actual patients may well benefit greatly from encountering a variety of views and clinical orientations, any cicurmspection, nuance or doubt concerning the medical consensus is coded as dangerous and deceptive.
The IMC appears to act not so much in the interest of Irish patients but essentially to protect the phoney "mighty Wizard of Oz" that is "best practice, evidence based medicine".
Anyone working in the field will known that umpteen medics, GPs and consultants are quietly acknowledging daily that these vaccines have caused and are causing a wide variety of health issues for recipients, from mild to serious and even fatal. (Mostly we hear of issues in cardiology, rheumatology, oncology but also neurology, gynaecology, dermatology etc.)
Dr Marcus is not so much a voice crying in the wilderness: he's simply one of the very few that has had the courage to voice his well informed if non-consenus abiding take throughout the "Covid era".
It is difficult to see an immediate postive path forward. As with the advanced bureauocritisation of any profession, here medicine of course, it seems inevitable that the IMC will continue to act to protect the "profession" rather than Irish patients.
Eventually medicine as currently operated will collapse under the weight of its own failings and runaway costs. Till then patients will be forced to advocate for themselves, try to educate themselves and seek out thougthful and skilled clinicians who may have some of Dr de Brun's abilities if little of his courage.
Whatever about the specifics of this case, the whole "Pandemine" theatre etc., what has happened here was an accident waiting to happen.
The nub of the issue is the now firmly established politiicisation and bureauocratisation of medicine: the notion that there exists specialist experts who are the inspired guardians of "the ScienceTM" and all others, from the public through nurses, CAM practitioners and indeed all doctors, once questioning the expert consensus on any given matter are bringing nothing but confusion, error and even dishonesty to the table.
Thus whille actual patients may well benefit greatly from encountering a variety of views and clinical orientations, any cicurmspection, nuance or doubt concerning the medical consensus is coded as dangerous and deceptive.
The IMC appears to act not so much in the interest of Irish patients but essentially to protect the phoney "mighty Wizard of Oz" that is "best practice, evidence based medicine".
Anyone working in the field will known that umpteen medics, GPs and consultants are quietly acknowledging daily that these vaccines have caused and are causing a wide variety of health issues for recipients, from mild to serious and even fatal. (Mostly we hear of issues in cardiology, rheumatology, oncology but also neurology, gynaecology, dermatology etc.)
Dr Marcus is not so much a voice crying in the wilderness: he's simply one of the very few that has had the courage to voice his well informed if non-consenus abiding take throughout the "Covid era".
It is difficult to see an immediate postive path forward. As with the advanced bureauocritisation of any profession, here medicine of course, it seems inevitable that the IMC will continue to act to protect the "profession" rather than Irish patients.
Eventually medicine as currently operated will collapse under the weight of its own failings and runaway costs. Till then patients will be forced to advocate for themselves, try to educate themselves and seek out thougthful and skilled clinicians who may have some of Dr de Brun's abilities if little of his courage.
@rjlowejr @KingOfVitamins Totally different. Sul. is an analoge of thiamine: vit B1 (niacin is vit B3).
This is far too generalised a statement: many of these chronic presentations do indeed have a significant psychoemotional mediating component in certain cases sure but minimal such for others.
Many presenting with CFS & "long covid" show zero signs of psychoemotional frailty. (Recall the original "yuppie flu" of the 80s was associated with the just the opposite type: extraordinarily high achieving successful & well adjusted people)
Newer mitochondrial tests suggest mito dysfunction is 1 common thread uniting many of these presentations so that's 1 significant physiological driver routinely overlooked by docs & shrinks alike.
Summary: some CFS type presentations may indeed have hidden psych issues; others have none at all. A very heterogeneous landscape clinically
Your doctor was trained in a medical school funded by pharmaceutical interests, using a curriculum that has not meaningfully changed in decades, inside a system that generates revenue when you are sick and generates nothing when you are well. That is not a conspiracy. That is a business model. And your doctor…who is often a genuinely good person who went into medicine because they wanted to help people…is operating inside that model whether they know it or not. The system shaped them before you ever walked into their office.
Usual responses to this kind of news: "proof" of some quintessential immorality in the DNA of: all "foreigners" for the racists; and of all men for the misandrists.
For context, Ireland sees alas approx 1 murder per week average in recent years so based on the % of non-nationals, one would expect c 1 murder each 5-6 weeks to involve a non-national perp if murderousness was equally distributed across Irish and non. Seems we're barely there.
For the men haters: recall that for every woman murdered by a man, approx 9-10 men are murdered (also by men). And for every woman whose life is saved by a woman (firefighters; coast guards; soliders; cops; random heroism etc) hundreds are saved by men risking their lives. And for every woman that dies by suicide, 4-5 men die that way.
Men are simply far more impulsive and physically powerful than women: so of course they kill more (themselves, other men and yes women) and they save a lot more lives than women also.
@cmisbackagain Jihadi? Beheading?
Usual responses to this kind of news: "proof" of some quintessential immorality in the DNA of: all "foreigners" for the racists; and of all men for the misandrists.
For context, Ireland sees alas approx 1 murder per week average in recent years so based on the % of non-nationals, one would expect c 1 murder each 5-6 weeks to involve a non-national perp if murderousness was equally distributed across Irish and non. Seems we're barely there.
For the men haters: recall that for every woman murdered by a man, approx 9-10 men are murdered (also by men). And for every woman whose life is saved by a woman (firefighters; coast guards; soliders; cops; random heroism etc) hundreds are saved by men risking their lives. And for every woman that dies by suicide, 4-5 men die that way.
Men are simply far more impulsive and physically powerful than women: so of course they kill more (themselves, other men and yes women) and they save a lot more lives than women also.
Usual responses to this kind of news: "proof" of some quintessential immorality in the DNA of: all "foreigners" for the racists; and of all men for the misandrists.
For context, Ireland sees alas approx 1 murder per week average in recent years so based on the % of non-nationals, one would expect c 1 murder each 5-6 weeks to involve a non-national perp if murderousness was equally distributed across Irish and non. Seems we're barely there.
For the men haters: recall that for every woman murdered by a man, approx 9-10 men are murdered (also by men). And for every woman whose life is saved by a woman (firefighters; coast guards; soliders; cops; random heroism etc) hundreds are saved by men risking their lives. And for every woman that dies by suicide, 4-5 men die that way.
Men are simply far more impulsive and physically powerful than women: so of course they kill more (themselves, other men and yes women) and they save a lot more lives than women also.
What is the meaning of this sentence "CEOs, surgeons, founders — those who lead at the highest level" in between the 1s in the paragraphs before and after? Does this test only predict longevity for such people or is that the target market you're aiming to engagment farm? Or ... ?
@DrMcFillin In answer to your initial Q: not not necessarily, even if BP was always cured by a ketogenic diet, which of course it isn't.
You mention "implementing" highly contrived therapeutic diets with your clients: is that allowed/operating within scope as a clinical psychologist?
@afshineemrani Why run v costly & hard to source advanced B12 testing when it's B2 & B7 that have been implicated here?
Minger is a smart lady
An untrained 22-year-old took apart The China Study. The most famous nutrition book in America. Two million copies sold. She did it on a free blog in 2010.
Denise Minger. Former raw-vegan blogger. No academic training. No nutrition degree. No medical degree. By her early twenties she had stopped feeling well on her vegan diet and started reading the science her own community kept citing.
The book at the center of that science was The China Study.
Written by Cornell professor T. Colin Campbell. Published in 2005. The central claim was simple. Animal protein causes cancer. The book became scripture for the plant-based movement.
Minger did something almost nobody had bothered to do. She downloaded the original China Project data that Campbell's book was built on. Then she taught herself the statistics package needed to actually run the correlations. She did this for free, on her own time, on a blog called Raw Food SOS.
What she found.
The data did not support the central claim. Correlations Campbell highlighted were weaker than he reported. Correlations he ignored undercut his thesis. Variables he never mentioned told a different story. She published every number. Every method. Every chart. Step by step.
The post went global. Tens of thousands of shares. Then hundreds of thousands. A 22-year-old with no credentials had dismantled the statistical case for the most influential plant-based book in America.
Campbell responded publicly. Minger responded with more citations. The consensus among numerate readers was that she had the better of the argument. She later wrote her own book. Death by Food Pyramid.
The China Study is still on bestseller shelves. Plant-based advocates still quote it. The data behind it did not survive a self-taught 22-year-old with a spreadsheet.
The lesson is not about veganism.
It is about checking the data behind the diet you are told to follow.
#NSNG #NoSugarNoGrains #VinnieTortorich #DeniseMinger #TheChinaStudy #NutritionScience #RealFood #DataMatters #EatRealFood #VeganMyths #DeathByFoodPyramid
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.2M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60M followers